Federal government under the Constitution too weak Essay Example

supremacy over the state governments. A critical analysis of Constitutional dispensation with accuracy and candor, it is found that federalism unde the constitution has less power since all the powers given to it are regulated by other arms of the government. The federal powers concerning war and peace, army's operation and fleets, treaties and finance, are all vested in the existing Congress by the articles of Confederation. This makes the federal government to be weak in its operation since it has to convince both the congress and the senate to make crucial decisions.

Check and Balances

This system of checks and balances, is the main cornerstone federalism under the constitution. The development of checks and balances has mad the federalism under constitution a weak system of government. This is because check and balances represent remedies to the challenges of how to empower the central government, yet form a protection against vices such as corruption and despotism. The President is given the power to veto acts of Congress are seen to be unnecessary or unjust, and he is also responsible for the appointment of federal and Supreme Court judges. The Senate has to ratify treaties proposed by the President, and has to approve the President's cabinet appointments. This in itself makes the federal government under constitution weak. Similarly, congress has the power to impeach, and remove the President from office, as well as Supreme Court justices, if need be. The powers given to both the house representative and the senate are too power to make the executive run smoothly. In this regard, the executive must bend down all the time to make its proposals be ratified by the

two legislative chambers. Therfeore, executive is forced to work under the check of the legislature.

The judicial arm whose head is the Supreme Court, has the mandate and power to interpret the laws passed by Congress. The US constitution has transformed the federalism system to be a system which is weak and cannot unanimously make decision without extensive llobbying and consultation with other branches of government. The state legislatures are mandated to elect Senators, and make a selection of delegates to the Electoral College, which in turn participate in selecting the President.

I have a pessimistic view of human character and therefore I support limited government. This is because egocentric behavior coupled with human lust for domination can mean that a too-powerful federal government can easily turn to be an engine of citizen exploitation. The separation of powers and federalism, one arm of the government cannot over step its mandateare ways in which there is protection of liberty. In a government system where political powers are divided among three separate branches of government. Federalism under constitution gives ensure that state and federal government check each other. It is prudent to note that principles of separation of powers under constitution mirrors the Founders’ disbelieve of the people to govern themselves. Separation of powers and the installation of proper checks and balances, guarantee that the national government controls itself and, if this check fails, federalism under constitution helps the states to protect the citizen from mistreatment by the central government.

Conclusion

The federal government under the constitution too weak to efficiently perform some of the duties which are geared for the betterment of the life of the people. This is because

all the powers given by the constitution are gain check by other branches of the government. In addition, all the three branches of the government, that is the legislature, judiciary and executive must work together. All the major decisions made by the executive must be ratified by the house of representatives and the senate. Therefore, the system is too weak to make major decisions in the country.