Nowadays, all people say that English is the most essential and easiest language that people could use to communicate in different countries. As I read thoroughly the two articles, which are called “ English seen as a Co-star among Global Language” and “Can English be Dethroned”, I’ve found out that people more commonly accept using English as a second language in the 21st century. We all understand the fact that English has been growing in popularity largely as economic globalization is getting bigger. The benefits of English as a common language for communication and interaction far outweigh any possible disadvantages that it might have.
English is a global language not because the world shows respect to it by accepting it as a global language because it has the characteristics of a global language. The very fact that people
...have linguistic diversity in the US makes it necessary to follow the single language system to ease out the gap in communication. This argument is well presented in the article ‘Can English Be Dethroned? ’ The essay answers the question favorably as it suggests English can never be dethroned from its unique position among languages.
Globalization has caused it to this high support, and there is no doubt that the language cannot be removed from its number one position in a global village. This neglecting of boundaries and barriers have made communication unable to be avoided; creating the need for a common language is also inescapable. Especially back in my country, still wearing our traditional longyi and htamein, which wrap around our waist represent that we are still native language speaker, from the point of view of western people;
however, we have adopted English as a common language that promoted our self to the world.
This argument refers to the importance of English in the global world to climb the ladders of success. Therefore, it is not possible to dethrone English. Moreover, in view of the advancement of technology, social media, traveling and communication, the most important to have a common language is to communicate: English is the best option from various choices since it is known and used by the majority of the people of the world. Especially, back in my country (Burma), tourism has been the largest income of the country.
In order to have good business, tourism companies have been developing teaching English as a second language to the employees. A Common language would go a long way to improve the political relations among countries of the world and improve trade and foreign commerce, thereby improving the economy of the people of the world as a whole. “English has taken root in diplomacy and gradually economic relations and the media” Reader’s choice, Split Edition. This is also a persuasive quote because in a world without economic barriers, a common language is a must.
There is the outgrowth of a virtual world, the social media where distances between countries are not at all an issue. For example in my country people who work for trading goods from countries to countries such as Burma to Singapore, all the traders communicate through the common language of English and the work gets done easily. There is an eagerness among the Burmese, Chinese, Koreans, etc, to improve their skills in the language since English helps them gain entry into
foreign markets.
I strongly think that without English as the common language, communication will be way too culturally neutral because looking at the argument “ Cultural imperialism is much more subtle than economic imperialism,” and author’s response that “It would be wrong to say that the world domination of English is something deliberately organized and supported by the Anglo-Saxon powers, hand in glove with political initiatives or the penetration of the world economy by their transnational firms.
To supports my belief, English can very well be adopted as culturally neutral medium of communication to contribute to the success of 21st century. Also the Yale linguist Stephen Anderson agrees to the fact that English only acts a medium and to influence the world culturally when he states, "The notion that English shouldn't, needn't and probably won't displace local languages seems natural to me. " All these arguments very well support the conclusion of only English has the potential to rise in the culturally neutral way as common language of communication.
- French Language essays
- Language Education essays
- Second Language Acquisition essays
- Teaching English As A Foreign Language essays
- Verb essays
- Dialect essays
- English Language essays
- Second Language essays
- Semiotics essays
- Sign Language essays
- Spanish Language essays
- Anthropology essays
- Audience essays
- Charity essays
- Cultural Competence essays
- Emile Durkheim essays
- Gender Roles essays
- Generation essays
- Globalization essays
- Interpersonal Relationship essays
- People essays
- Race essays
- Social Change essays
- Social Class essays
- Social Movement essays
- Social Science essays
- Social Status essays
- Social Stratification essays
- Society essays
- Sociological Imagination essays
- Sociological Perspective essays
- Sociological Theories essays
- Stereotypes essays
- Web Dubois essays
- American Dream essays
- Barriers To Entry essays
- Capitalism essays
- Central Bank essays
- Compensation essays
- Consumerism essays
- Economic Development essays
- Economic Growth essays
- Economic Inequality essays
- Economic System essays
- Economy essays
- Employment essays
- Export essays
- Finance essays
- Free Trade essays
- Gross Domestic Product essays