Episode in American History Essay Example

Constitution grants authority to the president to issue such orders, while Congress can pass laws enabling participation in war (Pohlman, 2004). According to the judge, the exclusion order aimed at safeguarding both the targeted group and national security as a whole.

Although of Japanese American descent, the accused individual was arrested for failing to comply with the exclusion order. The military suspected that they may have had hidden intentions that posed a threat to national security. When examining the constitutional aspect of this case, the Supreme Court made an erroneous decision based on unchecked information. Only later did they become aware of their error. Consequently, I contend that the ruling in this case infringed upon the constitution.

The incarceration of thousands of Japanese Americans was a clear violation of both the law and their rights, as confirmed by a court ruling. Furthermore, there was no substantial evidence connecting Japanese Americans to the Pearl Harbor attack. Consequently, I believe that this entire situation infringed upon the targeted group's rights and damaged America's reputation in terms of upholding the Constitution and Rule of Law.

References

1. Hall, K. L., & Ely, J. W. (2011). The Oxford companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press
2. Hoffer, P.

C., Hoffer, W., Hull, N. E. H., Supreme Court Historical Society, and Federal Judicial Center. (2016). The Federal Courts: An essential history.

L. (2004). "Constitutional debate in action." Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.