Cincinnati Gorilla Rhetoric Essay Example

believe that responsibility lies with the child's mother.

Society holds both the zoo and the child's mother responsible for the incident involving a child found in a cage. However, it is clear that the gorilla named "Harambee" had already faced numerous challenges due to human negligence, which ultimately resulted in its death. Due to someone's lack of attention, this endangered species lost its life. Despite being confined for human entertainment, Harambee had to pay the ultimate price, indicating that the mother caused trouble for the innocent gorilla. The concerns raised by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) organization regarding creating barriers between animals and human interactions may seem extreme. Nevertheless, in this case, it is not shortcomings in enclosure techniques provided for Harambee but rather the mother's lack of responsibility that is at fault.

Considering the circumstances in Cincinnati, it seems suitable to initiate a negligence lawsuit against the mother for multiple reasons. If alternative tranquilizer techniques that were either ineffective or jeopardized the child's life had been used by the response department, they might be considered negligent and could encounter legal consequences. Nonetheless, law enforcement may opt not to pursue legal actions in order to prioritize the well-being of both the child and mother, as well as for society's greater benefit. In my view, all individuals involved in this incident, including fellow zoo visitors, had an obligation to watch out for each other.

In spite of human fallibility and the possibility of unforeseen circumstances, it is imperative to give top priority to the safety and welfare of children in a distinct setting. The entire society would gain from legal intervention if necessary, with the

mother receiving assistance in parenting rather than facing legal consequences. This aid would enable her to fulfill her responsibilities in constructing a brighter future for society.