audit final – Flashcards
Unlock all answers in this set
Unlock answersquestion
| 60 days |
answer
| How many days after year end do large accelerated filers have to file with the SEC? (greater than $700 million market cap) |
question
| 75 days |
answer
| How many days after year end do accelerated filers have to file with the SEC? (greater than $75 million, less than $700 million market cap) |
question
| 90 days |
answer
| How many days after year end do non accelerated filers have to file with the SEC? (less than $75 million market cap) |
question
| 1. attorney letter 2. mgmt rep letter 3. audit opinion 4. mgmt letter 5. audit committee communications |
answer
| major documents at year end |
question
| revenue and expense accounts attorney letters management representations audit documentation review subsequent events |
answer
| activities between end of year and last day of fieldwork |
question
| inquiry of clients minutes of meetings review contracts/loan agreement review taxing/governmental agencies guarantees from bank confirmations legal services documentation |
answer
| procedures for contingent liabilities, hidden liabilities, litigation, claims and assessments |
question
| cannot issue audit opinion unless you have management representations letter |
answer
question
| audit report date (aka audit completion date) |
answer
| what is the date of the management representations letter? |
question
| alleviates liability on auditors, shows management responsibility for the fairness of the financial statements and fraud program and controls |
answer
| purpose of the management representations letter? |
question
| rollover method |
answer
| considers the current period income effects of misstatement |
question
| iron curtain method |
answer
| considers the aggregate effect of the adjustments on the entity's balance sheet |
question
| review latest interim financial statements inquire officers/other executives read minutes of meetings obtain attorney letters obtain mgmt representations letter |
answer
| procedures in subsequent period |
question
| Type I subsequent events |
answer
| provide new information about conditions existing at balance sheet date |
question
| adjust financial statmenets to reflect new information |
answer
| What do you do with Type I subsequent events |
question
| Type II Subsequent Events |
answer
| involve events occurring after balance sheet date |
question
| disclose in financial statements (if extreme, prepare pro forma financial statements) |
answer
| What to do with Type II subsequent events |
question
| Type II subsequent events |
answer
| non-recognized subsequent events |
question
| Type I Subsequent events |
answer
| recognized subsequent events |
question
| subsequent discovery of facts omitted procedures communication with audit committee management letters |
answer
| activities following issuance of auditor's reports |
question
| significant deficiency |
answer
| a control deficiency that adversely affects the accounting and reporting function such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a more than inconsequential F/S misstatement will not be prevented or detected |
question
| material weakness |
answer
| significant deficiency that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material F/S misstatement will not be prevented or detected |
question
| management letters are NOT required under GAAS |
answer
question
| management letters |
answer
| provide recommendations to client for improving effectiveness and efficiency of operations, delivered by auditor to client following audit engagement |
question
| subseuent discovery of facts omitted porcedures communication with those charged with governance management letters |
answer
| review following audit report release date |
question
| within 60 days of report release date |
answer
| documentation completion date for ALL audits (public and private) |
question
| 1. all audit documentation is reviewed 2. F/S prepared (and footnotes) 3. signed mgmt rep letter by CEO/CFO |
answer
| 3 requirements for the earliest the opinion date can be |
question
| test basis materiality significant estimates |
answer
| specific references in the scope paragraph of the standard report |
question
| unqualified opinion adverse opinion (material weakness) disclaimer |
answer
| types of internal control opinions |
question
| qualified |
answer
| issued when departure from GAAP is material but not pervasive |
question
| circumstance imposed scope limitation |
answer
| situation in which matters beyond auditors' and client's control limit procedures performed by the auditor |
question
| client imposed scope limitation |
answer
| situation in which client specifically limits auditors procedures (use disclaimer) |
question
| qualified opinion |
answer
| issued when scope limitation material, but not pervasive |
question
| disclaimer of opinion |
answer
| issued when pervasive scope limitation (usually client imposed) |
question
| disclaimer of opinion |
answer
| if serious going concern uncertainty, issue |
question
| rule 203 |
answer
| allows for unqualified opinions on FS that are not in conformity with GAAP if GAAP would be misleading |
question
| financial relationships management relationships |
answer
| two general types of relations that can compromise auditors independence |
question
| qualified unqualified disclaimer adverse |
answer
| 4 types of audit opinions |
question
| 1. assess fraud risk 2. design the audit to detect fraud 3. report findings to appropriate persons |
answer
| 3 SAS 99 activities that must be performed |
question
| nature of audit procedures |
answer
| effectiveness of tests; type of procedures preformed; quality of evidence |
question
| timing of audit procedures |
answer
| when the procedures are performed |
question
| extent of the audit procedures |
answer
| how many procedures are performed; quantity |
question
| early planning stages and wrap up |
answer
| when are analytical procedures required during audit engagements? |
question
| ar = ir * cr * dr |
answer
| audit risk model |
question
| effective internal controls; increase detection risk |
answer
| what can lower assessment of control risk? how does this impact detection risk? |
question
| tracing |
answer
| are all transactions recorded? moving forward from original source documents to see if recorded in general ledger/FS |
question
| completeness |
answer
| what management assertion is associated with tracing? |
question
| vouching |
answer
| taking the accounts/transactions and looking back to determine their original source |
question
| existence |
answer
| management assertion associated with vouching |
question
| independence in fact |
answer
| auditors' mental attitude and impartiality with respect to the client |
question
| independence in appearance |
answer
| the extent to which others perceive auditors to be independent |
question
| detection risk |
answer
| the risk that the audit team's procdres will fail to detect a material misstatement |
question
| control risk |
answer
| the probability that material misstatement will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the entity's internal controls |
question
| inherent risk |
answer
| the probability that a material misstatement will occur |
question
| errors |
answer
| unintentional misstatements or omissions |
question
| fraud |
answer
| knowingly making material misrepresentations of fact with the intent of inducing someone to believe the falsehood and act on it and thus suffer loss or damage |
question
| schedules and analysis to be prepared by the client's employees |
answer
| an audit engagement letter should normally included what matters of agreement between the auditor and the client |
question
| identifying related parties |
answer
| would be performed during planning |
question
| 1. attempt to contact the predecessor auditors 2. evaluate the integrity of management 3. assess the firm's resources to ensure that they are sufficient to permit them to accept the engagement |
answer
| prior to accepting a new audit engagement, a public accounting firm should: |
question
| performing tests of controls |
answer
| major stage of the audit that is closely related to attributes sampling |
question
| the expected population deviation rate with probability equal to the risk of over reliance that the population deviation rate is higher |
answer
| the interpretation of the upper limit rate of deviation in an attributes sampling application |
question
| use attributes sampling in selecting purchase orders for indication of proper authorization |
answer
question
| simpler to use |
answer
| primary benefit of using non statistical sampling |
question
| examine sample items and determine the sample estimate |
answer
| step normally performed last in a sampling application |
question
| provide objective basis for quantitatively evaluating sampel risk |
answer
| an advantage of statistical sampling over non statistical sampling methods is that statistical methods: |
question
| Compliance Efficiency and effectiveness Reliability |
answer
| The COSO provides a definition of internal controls which includes the following 3 categories from most important to least important |
question
| Observation Inquiry Document examination Reperformance |
answer
| There are several phases to the auditor’s evaluation of a client’s internal controls. Phase 3 requires that auditors perform tests of controls and reassess risk of material misstatement rely on 4 different testing methods. What are they? |
question
| Custody Authorization Recording Reconciliation |
answer
| List 4 different separation of duties |
question
| Vouching and Tracing |
answer
| Primary PCAOB assertion for each of the 2 cycles? (Revenue and Collection) |