Management issues Essay Example

adapt different behavior on Task and relationship wit h employers: One example Of application Of think it is find out on General George Patton, 0 nee of the highhanded leader of the American military who utilized the situational leadership style. H IM war strategy and tactics based on that idealism.

In order to win the war he was focused on analyzing t he situation which became the way of planning the course of action being ready to change plans if an UN expected situation appears. What it is found it these theorist is that they prioritize the task, after, the skill s and motivation of such employers, it suites emergency and critical operations where the people who can take responsibility to find solutions for the organization is key. People differ not only in their ability to do but also in their "will to do" (Paul Hershey).

Robert House: Pathology Leadership Theory Robert House's belief on leader is that the style effect to the job satisfy action and performance of the network employees, in order to be successful leader guides workers to chi Jose the best path to achieve their goals and provide the direction to ensure that employees' goals are compatible with the organization's goals. Robert indicates that leaders have to be flexible and avail able to change their style depending on the situation, it is their job to assist.

A remarkable example was successful leader Steve Jobs with a continuous Rene ovation of technology on Apple. He didn't simply ask to do the task, he based his leadership on method around teamwork and listened what his employers had to say. To rapport it was

the key factor.

If we compare situational leadership ideas with Robert House thinking, it is fin d out that priorities are invested, employees' goals are as relevant as it is the task of the company to g row, in this way the company gets a stabilized situation where it is possible to get the satisfaction I n all fields.

Discussing the ideas and how might improve career prospects Both ways of think about leadership are proved that it works, but as in the both sides tell, it is accessory to be flexible and adapt the style depending on the case. From one side Paul and ken's thinking is necessary when it is living a crisis, is more important to keep the co many working smoothie than workers because if the company falls, everyone fall.

From another side R obverse ideas of work for employees' goals are essential when the company is working without limp or I s successful, because the quality is the required one and the quality it is given throughout all the people is working, not just the leader.

In conclusion, the comparison of both thoughts and the right use of the me depending on the taxation can help to take out a company from a crisis and keep that on stead y rising when good times come.

Teamwork A teamwork is the process of collaboration in a group of people in order to AC hive a goal, where people try to cooperate, using their individual skills and providing constructive feed jack. Their individual efforts results in a level of performance that is greater than the sum of those individual al input. The

team must have a reason for work together, they need each other's experience ability an d be committed to the idea of working together.

It is found two famous theories of teamwork whole authors have though in did efferent ways when they develop their idea, TCPMAN with stages of group and Meredith Beeline with tee am roles.

Bruce TCPMAN: Stages of team development Dustman's model is focused on develop maturity and ability on a team, estate gashing relationship and changing the leadership sense depending on the point of necessity to create a successful group. The teamwork since is made to the last step of internal performance is change thro ought four steps: forming, storming, morning and performing.

Like Situational leadership think Eng Bruce thinking consist that It is need to change/ adapt the manner of teamwork style depending on the experience working g together as the relation of the people unventilated on the common goal. A example of stages of team development application was on study in an only nee masters degree program at University of Illinois in United States where processes included the e activities identified by TCPMAN.

The results found are the evidence that team performance was deep indent on how well the teams had the capacity to establish procedures, resolve issues and collaborator e on the common task, On TCPMAN ' s idea Of teamwork the factor that make it works is the interact n between comrades.

Him idea of successful team consisted on modulate the leader and people trust till the point that group work as it is expected. From him side of thinking people need time to be productive as

a team achieving common goals and the role depends on the hierarchy responsibility they are able to take.

Meredith Beeline: Team roles On Beeline team roles idea, workers are chosen depending on their ability to e ensure the correct balance of skills, which are divided into ten categories depending on function they off ere Cord NATO,Shaper, Monitor Evaluator, Completer, Company Worker, Resource Investigator, Team Worker, Plant and behavior is achieved and their should learn to adapt the behavior to the nee des of the of team's objective. The chairman clarify the goal and priorities, control the way the tea m moves forward and make a good use of team resources.

It is more relevant what the people can bring t o the group than the unification of the group into a closed relationship. Applied into education, Smith, Please & Parry (2012) applied the Beeline tea m role and observed the results which showed a slight improvement in group performance compared with that of previous cohorts, with a significant increase in fractals grades Him develop on teamwork let to people play the role they are strong at, cord initiator choose what have to do the people at the time it is need it. The time needed to be productive as a group is low.

Beeline s idea it suits the team that are developing their individual abilities but is harder to b come a strong team.

After show two opinions of how a team work should be successful, we find oh t different mentalities and purposes, which bring different advantages and weakness. From one side the re is TCPMAN 's mentality of group achievement where is

fundamental the relationship among workers to become task focused, here is a belief in shared aims and objective, open expression Of feelings and disagreements and the resolutions of conflict by the members, full participation by all members and decision making by consensus and,.

From another side, Beeline s idea is easier to make sense of c ointment to the team, acceptance of group values and norms, a lower level of staff turnover, absent sexism, accidents, errors & complaints. As it is represented, both ways are useful but, depending if the nee deed is to create a long term team and have the opportunity to improve their employers it will be better to work throughout TCPMAN ' s hero or in the case it is short time term and it is need to make fast changes on the task or people.

Conclusion The evidence is overwhelming: both points discussed on the essay are reliable e on two kinds of work situation where it is need it to apply the correct theory in order to be successful LU: For leadership When times are calm and there are no relevant crisis, it is possible to apply Pa the Goal idea in order to improve the quality of the team members, and with that, the comma NY. If there is an external crisis for the company or team that can make it fall it we will need to think as Hershey and Blanchard to survive.