Carb Cutter Lab Report Essay Example
Carb Cutter Lab Report Essay Example

Carb Cutter Lab Report Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
View Entire Sample
Text preview

In the United States, there is a growing issue of obesity and overweight individuals. The prevalence of these conditions continues to rise annually. According to Anonymous (2011), approximately 33.9% of American adults are considered obese, while 34.4% are categorized as overweight but not obese. Consequently, more people are actively seeking alternative methods to shed pounds.

If given the chance, would you be willing to try a weight loss pill that truly works? A recent study has supplied evidence indicating that Carb Cutter pills effectively hinder the action of amylase, an enzyme responsible for breaking down starch. By preventing starch from converting into glucose and ultimately body fat, this supplement can aid in weight loss.

The unabsorbed carbohydrates are eliminated from the body through the digestive system. Despite claims of remarkable effects, other studies contradict this. Mayo Clinic rese

...

arch indicates that a dosage of 4,000 to 6,000 mg of bean extract or phaseolamin is necessary to slow down carbohydrate digestion. Sadly, many carb blockers on the market have lower amounts of phaseolamin. In fact, most only have 500mg of white kidney bean extract, which falls short of the recommended dosage.

Milone (2008) discovered that weight loss does not occur as a result of carbohydrate digestion. To investigate this concept, Biology students at UGA performed an experiment to compare a control group simulating natural bodily processes with an experimental group emulating the impact of taking the Carb Cutter pill. Absorbance levels were used to measure the results, indicating the extent to which starch obstructed light transmission in a solution.

The solution's starch content directly correlates with its absorbance levels. If the solution still has significant

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

starch levels, it indicates that the starch was not digested and the Carb Cutter was effective. We monitored the absorbance of the control group every minute to observe the effects of amylase, our body's starch-digesting enzyme, on starch alone. We expected the control group to show a decrease in absorbance as amylase digestion occurred. The experimental group included everything from the control group, along with the addition of the Carb Cutter pill.

The graph shows how effective the Carb Cutter is in inhibiting amylase from digesting starch. A high absorbance would indicate continuous inhibition of amylase if the Carb Cutter truly works. However, conducting an experiment with multiple solutions and time measurements can introduce human error. Waiting for 15-20 minutes for digestion may lead to mistakes, especially considering time constraints in the Biology Lab.

The results of the experiment indicated that the Carb Cutter pill led to an increase in absorbance, which is not accurate since it is impossible for more starch to be produced in the solution. If given more time, this laboratory experiment might have yielded more accurate results. The results obtained by biology department students at UGA were consistent with those of the Mayo Clinic study. Slowing down amylase may require a significant dosage of bean extract in order to effectively achieve the desired outcome and observe results.

The graph reveals a pattern of increasing and then decreasing absorbance for the Carb Cutter. This pattern suggests that Carb Cutter initially prevented the breakdown of starch by amylase but lost its effectiveness after a few minutes, allowing amylase to resume control. Hence, according to the graph, Carb Cutters have some

effect but are not sufficient in preventing weight gain.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New