12 Angry Men Critical Analysis Essay Sample

can convert Juror 3 that the male child is guiltless.The concluding similarity being discussed will be about how Juror 3s tone of voice affected the readers illation of his character. In the drama the dramatists waies for Juror 3 are largely aloud or shouting.

The same is in the film. Juror 3 is invariably shouting and shouting. seeking to do a point. From this the reader can deduce that Juror 3 gets angered rapidly and is stubborn at times. He besides thinks his sentiment is more of import than the others because he merely stressed his sentiment and non the others. This item entirely suggests Juror 3 is difficult to work with.

The similarities brought out many good inside informations in the narrative and the characters.There are besides many differences between the text and movie. One of them is how Juror 3 admits the male child is non guilty. In the drama. all Reginald Rose wrote was that Juror 3 began to lb on the desk and seemed about to shout. He so said.

Not guilty. The reader is left baffled as to why Juror 3 merely admitted to non guilty when he kept stating guilty throughout the drama. The reader may believe that Juror 3 felt overpowered by everyone and felt weak as opposed to 11 other people who had different point of views on the instance. One may besides believe that Juror 3 got tired of the instance and merely wanted to go forth. In the film nevertheless.

Juror 3 is shown rending his boies picture up with trembling custodies and so shouting. He besides mentions how he worked his life out into

his boy. but for what? He got punched in the face and ne'er saw his boy once more. From this little scene the reader can deduce that Juror 3s obstinate behaviour was all caused by the heartache of his boy. It seemed as if Juror 3 realized that he shouldnt penalize the male child because of the memories he had of his boy.

Another difference is when Juror 3 is shouting at the others and angrily inquiring them how they can believe that the male child is guiltless. The manager does many choker shootings of Juror 3 to demo his facial looks. His facial looks express tonss of choler towards the male child and the jurymans. In the drama there is no manner to see the extent of the choler of the jurymans because the drama can merely account for motions and tone of voice. In the film Juror 3 merely supports stating non guilty without a valid ground until he talks about his boy.

The drama nevertheless incorporates the boy scene earlier into the narrative and mistily lets the reader know why Juror 3 is upset. The film gives the reader a better opportunity of understanding the narrative and why Juror 3 caved in and chose non guilty. The concluding difference discussed will be about the things Juror 3 did before stating non guilty to the guard. In the drama Juror 3 picks up the knife and holds it in the knife-fighter approved manner.

He stares difficult at Juror 8 and so says. non guilty. He so follows through by peeking from side to side and traveling out the door.The reader can reason from this

scene that Juror 3 still has 2nd ideas about the finding of fact and is nervous because of his behaviour. He seems concerned that the other Jurors might believe he is a obstinate adult male who merely said non guilty because he was pressured into making it.

The stoping scene is portrayed wholly otherwise in the movie. It shows Juror 3 still weak from shouting and easy garnering his properties. He softly goes out the door. go forthing his boies torn image on the desk.

The reader can reason from this scene that Juror 3 is seeking to forgive his boy for pluging him and that Juror 3 is seeking to travel on. This scene revealed a wholly different Juror 3. It shows a Juror 3 that is more sort and forgiving. It shows a more humanist individual.After analysing all of these similarities and differences between the drama and the movie. the reader or spectator can reason that the similarities and differences merely assist them understand the narrative better.

The similarities bring out the inside informations of the characters and assist do the narrative more apprehensible. The differences besides help do the narrative more apprehensible. The differences in the movie dont make the spectator confused as to why Juror 3 changed his head.