Why Have Historians Disagreed About the Success of the Vienna Settlement? Essay Example
The Vienna Settlement (1814-1815) was made up of not one but three sets of negotiations.
The First Treaty of Paris (May 1814), which was made just after the French Revolution, was convened to prevent Europe before French expansion. The Treaty forced Napoleon to abdication and he was sent to/on the Elba. The Congress of Vienna – which was a conference between ambassadors of the most powerful countries in Europe – went from November 1814 to June 1815. It was until Napoleon had run off from Elba and interrupted the Congress with his ‘100days’. The Congress indeed did not make any decisions not related to borders and new order in Europe except banishing the slave trade in France.
The main aim for Europe was to prevent countries before France and preserve peace. After Napoleon’s ‘100 Days’, when the battle of Waterlo
...o was his great defeat, countries assembled once again on the Second Treaty of Paris (November 1815). Monarchs reduced France o its 1790 boundaries and ordered it to pay indemnity. Like with everything, the Vienna Settlement had its bad and good sides and this is what made a dispute between historians. The Settlement was hugely criticized by the historians, who had lived in the 19th century.
According to liberalism and nationalism, arrangements made in 1814-1815 were ‘backward-looking’ and not popular. Lord Greville, the member of the Cabinet in England was firmly against it and said that he must have been ‘seduced by his vanity’ to have agreed with such an arrangement. England was the country of liberalism, so it was nothing new that in 1817 in the Black Dwarf you could read complaints of the legitimacy, which went awry
for the public opinion. tzn ta legitimacy nie byla po mysli) First of all, the most reasons for complaining had France. The Bourbon monarch was restored, Napoleon was unduly punished and exiled, and also they blamed the Vienna Settlement for the next revolutions. Antonin Debidour, the Frenchman, wrote that the allies ‘consulted only their own convenience and interest and took no account of the aspirations of the people’ (such opinions can be found in the works of J.Droz in the 1960s, 1970s). Normam Davies in Europe – A history was still highly critical. In his opinion, the settlement was very conservative and it ‘actually put the clock back’.
- Berlin essays
- Pompeii essays
- Paris essays
- Athens essays
- Belgium essays
- England essays
- Germany essays
- Greece essays
- Ireland essays
- Italy essays
- London essays
- Russia essays
- Spain essays
- United Kingdom essays
- Great britain essays
- Rome essays
- British essays
- Birmingham essays
- Federal government essays
- Armed Forces essays
- Confederate States Of America essays
- Federal Government Of The United States essays
- Fourteenth Amendment To The United States Constitution essays
- Governance essays
- Parliament essays
- Politics essays
- Jurisdiction essays
- Bureaucracy essays
- Separation Of Powers essays
- Congress essays
- President essays
- United States Congress essays
- Non-Commissioned Officer essays
- Appeal essays
- Revenge essays
- Corporate Governance essays
- Public Service essays
- Income Tax essays
- Supply essays
- Red Cross essays
- Democracy essays
- State essays
- Liberty essays
- Absolutism essays
- Reform essays
- Republic essays
- John Marshall essays
- Bourgeoisie essays
- Developed Country essays
- Elections essays
