Alternative Dispute Resolution Flashcards, test questions and answers

Discover flashcards, test exam answers, and assignments to help you learn more about Alternative Dispute Resolution and other subjects. Don’t miss the chance to use them for more effective college education. Use our database of questions and answers on Alternative Dispute Resolution and get quick solutions for your test.

What is Alternative Dispute Resolution?

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an increasingly popular way to resolve disputes without going through the traditional court system. ADR processes such as mediation and arbitration are designed to provide a more efficient and cost-effective means of resolving conflicts, which is why many businesses, government agencies, and private individuals choose to utilize them. This essay will explain what ADR is, discuss its benefits and drawbacks, and analyze how it fits within the legal system. ADR is the umbrella term used to describe a wide range of processes aimed at resolving disputes outside of the courtroom. The two most common types of ADR are mediation and arbitration; however there are other forms such as collaborative law or fact-finding that may be used in certain cases. Each type of ADR has its own unique set of rules and procedures that must be followed in order for it to be effective. Generally speaking, all forms involve one or more neutral third parties who may be professional mediators or arbitrators helping the disputing parties come to an agreement without going through the formalities of litigation. One benefit of using ADR is that it can often result in faster resolution than traditional court proceedings since there is less bureaucracy involved. It also tends to be less costly since there are no court fees or lawyers’ fees associated with it; instead, parties usually just have to pay for any administrative costs associated with their chosen method (such as filing fees). Additionally, because both sides have input into how their dispute will be resolved, they often feel like they have been treated fairly in comparison with proceedings decided by a judge or jury which tend to leave only one party satisfied with the outcome. Though there are many advantages associated with utilizing Alternative Dispute Resolution methods for settling disputes outside of courtrooms, there are also some potential drawbacks that should not be ignored when deciding whether this avenue should be pursued. For example: while these methods can promote quicker resolutions than litigation, they don’t always work out best for everyone involved due to disagreements between parties on how matters should proceed; additionally if either side feels like they weren’t given fair treatment then they may still take their case before a judge anyway thereby nullifying any time saved by avoiding litigation initially. Furthermore due lack oversight from judicial bodies during these proceedings there can sometimes be issues regarding confidentiality or authenticity when dealing with sensitive information between two disputing sides that could create further complications if not properly addressed beforehand.