Romanov Family Essay Example
Romanov Family Essay Example

Romanov Family Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
Topics:
  • Pages: 4 (902 words)
  • Published: November 10, 2017
  • Type: Research Paper
View Entire Sample
Text preview

The primary aspect regarding source J is its relatively recent authorship compared to all other sources.

Written 75 years after the murder, this recent source benefits from modern technology that could greatly aid in solving the mystery of the Tsar and his family's fate. It offers strong evidence to support other sources, while also raising new questions and providing a unique perspective. The source presents an extract from a December 1994 newspaper, informing readers about recent discoveries and shedding light on a previously unnoticed issue. The independent author penned this source after the separation of the USSR.

The absence of biased data indicates reliability, making source A a dependable option. Specifically, it is a December 1918 report from an American Newspaper detailing Judge Sergeyev's discoveries.

Despite both sources discussing the

...

same event, there is a notable discrepancy in their accounts. Source J claims that only Nicolas, his wife, and three daughters were discovered in the burial site. This implies that the Tsar's son and an additional daughter did not perish with the rest of the family, leading to speculation that their remains have yet to be located.

Source A states that the Tsar, family doctor, two servants, and maid were all shot. Although both sources may be valid, it is improbable for multiple individuals to be killed at separate times and places and then have their remains buried in different locations. Some bodies interred together while others are buried elsewhere. Sir Charles Elliot authored Source B as part of his inquiry into the murder of the Tsar and his family in 1918. Both Source A and B derive from Judge Sergeyev, who has a questionable reputation.

The aim of this

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

report was to provide the British Government with an update on Russia's present state. An interesting paradox can be observed in sources B and J. While source B claims that no corpses or signs of cremation were discovered, source J mentions finding the bodies of the Royal family, contradicting source B's statement. Source C comprises a fragment from Judge Sokolov's book regarding the inquiry into the assassination of the Romanov clan.

The initial disclosure of the fate of the Romanov family's remains reveals that a truck transported them to the mine owned by four brothers where they were dismembered, burned with fuel and sulphuric acid. However, it remains unclear if these pieces were buried according to this source.

According to Source J, the bodies were initially interred in a shallow pit but were eventually moved back onto the lorry when the mine failed to cave in. The lorry later became stuck in a swamp, and it was at this location that the remains were buried. It is interesting to note that "bodies" was utilized instead of "body parts," though there is no indication as to whether these bodies were interred from the bogged vehicle or if they remained within it.

Despite discrepancies, source C contradicts both sources D and J as presented. Source D comprises interview notes with Pavel Medvedev, a white who describes the Bolsheviks' role in guarding the Romanov family at the Impatiev house. Although source J pertains to a distinct aspect of the inquiry involving Maria, a key witness, it is improbable that this would affect source D's credibility. Nonetheless, an important detail from source J concerns nine individuals entering the room where Tsar's family,

their maid, and Dr. Botkin were present.

The statement reports that the individuals were dead and located on the ground. This information does not directly conflict with source J, but it raises concerns about why the family wasn't interred together if they were all fatally shot. In 1991, a book was published that featured an excerpt from source E providing insights into Medvedev's wife's account of the killings. Source E only mentions the Tsar as a family member, offering limited points for comparison to source J.

The Basement room in the Impatiev house, where it is believed the Tsar and his family were shot, is depicted in Source F as an image. There is no significant comparison to be made with Source J. Source G, on the other hand, is an artist's rendition of the Tsar's death, based on the whites investigation. Its purpose was to provide insight into the author's interpretation of how the Tsar died. However, like sources E and F, the credibility of this source is questionable. Meanwhile, Source H presents a diagram of the supposed positions of the Romanovs and the guards during the event.

Source I is derived from the same book by Judge Sokolov as Source C, which was published in 1924. The information provided in the source does not reveal the location or method of death of the Romanov family members, nor does it specify their exact position. Additionally, the content of Source I consists of a message sent by the Ural Soviet to the Petrograd Soviet.

This source is discussing an event that took place on July 20, 1918. It is the most confusing source as it claims that

the Tsar's wife and son are still safe and alive, despite contradicting other sources. It is unclear why the Ural Soviet would lie about their survival. Ultimately, this source, labeled J, raises more questions than it answers, casting doubt on who was killed and where and when it happened.

Providing a fresh perspective on the killing of the Romanovs.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New