Principles of Project Management Essay Example
Principles of Project Management Essay Example

Principles of Project Management Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 9 (2455 words)
  • Published: October 16, 2017
  • Type: Case Study
View Entire Sample
Text preview

The Commitment Principle

An just committedness between the undertaking patron and the undertaking bringing squad must be before a possible undertaking exists. The Undertaking Sponsor is considered to be the Project Owner who provides resources such as financess. services and general way. The undertaking bringing squad is the 1 in charge for appropriate techniques. programs and controls for utilizing the accomplishments needed and work to change over those resources into the needed deliverables or merchandise.

Effective collaboration requires building trust and fostering understanding between the Sponsor and the team. Undertaking patrons must set clear boundaries for cost and time, which will serve as guidelines for the director. If the agreed deliverables cannot be met within these limits, any concerns should be escalated to the patron for a decision. It is crucial to have clearly defined roles and responsibilities within a project team to ensure that each individual understands the

...

ir duties and has confidence in their ability to fulfill them.

Understanding how individuals can contribute to a project's objectives is essential. Project stakeholders must have a clear comprehension of their roles and responsibilities, including the specific tasks they are expected to perform. Defining and understanding the project environment is crucial.

The Success Principle

The success criteria are crucial for project management decision-making and post-project evaluation. They define the necessary steps to achieve success, in terms of both process and product, at the start of the project. This foundation allows continuous management decision-making throughout the project's duration.

Timing of measuring success may require consideration. Understanding the project's success criteria is necessary to determine its ultimate success.

The Tetrad Trade-off Principle

The core variables of the project management process are product scope.

The concepts of

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

quality class, time-to-produce, and cost-at-completion must all be mutually compatible and achievable. The term "Tetrad trade-off" may not be widely known.

However, it might be argued that the value of the term lies in emphasizing that there are four distinct yet interconnected variables. These variables include range, quality, time, and cost, rather than just three as traditionally represented by the 'Triple Constraint' (time, cost, and performance). The benefit of considering all four variables instead of three to form a triangle is that it places greater emphasis on quality.

Out of the four, the stability of the quality of the merchandise appears to be the most consistent.

The Strategy Principle

A scheme involves first planning and then taking action in a focused series of consecutive and progressive stages that must be in place before the project begins.

It is crucial for consumers to carefully consider the products or deliverables they require. They should define their needs precisely and provide detailed information to create a feasible plan. This simplifies the project management process and reduces risks.

The principle of management

The management principle emphasizes the method and individuals responsible for completion. Effective and efficient policies and procedures must be established to ensure appropriate behavior and control of the project commitment.

The Single-Point Responsibility Principle

The Single-Point Responsibility Principle is an extension of the direction rule and is crucial for the effective management of project commitment. In order to coordinate a complex project, clear communication is essential. A single channel of communication must be established between the project sponsor and the project team leader for all decisions related to

the product scope.

The Cultural Environment Principle

To ensure that the project delivery team can work to their fullest potential, management must provide an informed and supportive cultural environment. This applies regardless of the chosen methodology or framework.

In order to meet its specific requirements, the project must undergo modifications. Instead of strictly following a particular methodology, the project manager needs to be flexible in their approach to address the project's unique needs. Moreover, it is essential for the organization's management to provide support and establish an environment that facilitates smooth progress of the project. (Wideman, Robert Max; Bing)

John A.; Neal, Gerald; (2000) B. Evaluate the feasibility of at least five (5) criteria for measuring the success or failure of a project (1.

2) A successful undertaking must have the following key elements:

  1. The stakeholders involved in the undertaking (including the undertaking squad, client, undertaking leader, and direction) must reach an agreement or consensus on the objectives of the undertaking.
  2. A well-defined undertaking program that outlines the achievable goals, provides a clear overall direction, and includes pertinent information and details for calculating resources such as people, money, time, and equipment.

Having all the necessary equipment and materials, as well as tracking progress, is crucial for completing the job. Continuous and effective communication among all project stakeholders is important for managing and coordinating actions, identifying and solving problems, and adapting to changes. It is also necessary to implement a controlled scope or "stakeholder expectations management".

To ensure that all individuals involved in the project understand their responsibilities, a systematic approach is needed to establish practical goals for deliverables, cost, schedule, and quality. This includes techniques for maintaining consistent

goals throughout the project. Additionally, upper management support is crucial.

"Managing upward" involves guiding upper-level directors towards appropriate decisions to keep the project on track, including managing people and resources and overcoming organizational obstacles.

The primary reasons for project failure include:


1. Insufficient User Involvement

One reason for project failures is the lack of user participation in the system development process. When those who will use the system do not actively engage in the project, it often leads to failure.

Without user engagement, projects will face difficulties as management has not allocated individuals to carry out the tasks that users should be responsible for. In order for a project to achieve success, both management and users must actively participate in every stage of the development process. This necessitates dedication of time and effort.

2. Prolonged or Unrealistic Timeframes

The primary suggestion is to keep project timelines brief.

The text emphasizes the importance of splitting better systems into separate undertakings despite the challenges associated with this approach. However, the overall benefit is significant.


3. Poor or No Requirements

Poor requirements pose a major challenge for projects. Inability to identify good requirements also leads to other delivery issues, such as having to limit project scope to minimize workload and risk. It is crucial for users to have a clear understanding of their needs and be able to specify them accurately. Failing to meet the business requirements renders the success of the project irrelevant.

The alteration or growing of undertaking range, also known as scope creep, is a hazard in most undertakings. It more often occurs during the ulterior phases of a undertaking and can lead to client/business dissatisfaction.

The occurrence of problems such as scheduling and proving is more

likely during the earlier phases, such as design. This can happen when the range of a project is not properly defined, documented, or controlled.

This is a similar issue to alter control for direction. Management should be able to calculate everything at the start. A project manager often tries to manage range weirdo. The goal in managing range weirdo is to minimize the impact of any changes on the project, such as on the timeline and cost.

5. No Change Control System

Business demands are changing even more rapidly than ever before. There may be inevitable external demands over which you have no control, such as new regulations for data privacy or changed regulatory reporting requirements. So it is unrealistic to expect no change in demands while a project or system is being built. However, uncontrolled changes create chaos in a system under improvement and have caused many project confusion and failures.

The IT and project directors have failed in previous IT projects due to various reasons including missing deadlines, exceeding the budget, cost overruns, using untested technology leading to project failure, inadequate project definition by the owner possibly caused by lack of communication with stakeholders or failure to specify requirements and desired outcomes, lack of ownership and personal accountability by senior management, insufficiently skilled and experienced project teams, inadequate reporting arrangements and decision-making processes, and inconsistent understanding of required project activities, functions, and responsibilities.

On the other hand, there are also criteria for successful projects. These include meeting the budget, achieving milestones, having a clearly defined scope and agreed understanding of the intended outcome, actively managing risks and issues with timely decision-making supported by clear reporting lines, ongoing commitment

and support from senior management, a senior individual with personal accountability and overall responsibility for the successful outcome of the project, and having defined and visibly managed processes suitable for the scale and complexity of the project.

The Calvert Social Index is an index developed by Calvert Investments that serves as a benchmark for socially responsible or ethical large companies. It currently consists of 468 companies weighted based on their market capitalization.

Calvert's societal standards are used to select companies from the largest publically traded companies in the United States. These standards cover the environment, workplace issues, merchandise safety, and community relations.

The creation of this index is a result of the success of the Domini 400 Social Index, developed by KLD Research & Analytics, Inc., which focuses on arms undertaking, international operations, and human rights. Many socially responsible mutual funds use the Calvert index as a benchmark for their performance.

These standards have enhanced the company's direction and improved their understanding of customer preferences. By adhering to these standards, they have effectively marketed highly sought-after merchandise. Additionally, these standards have contributed to enhancing product development efforts and setting them apart from competitors.

Moreover, it helped enhance the company's financial management and establish a favorable business reputation. The Project Management Process emphasizes the importance of defining three main deliverables before starting the project, specifically the Project Definition.

The work program and Project Management Procedures are a reliable and effective way to communicate the procedures to the project team and clients. The Project Management Procedures outline how the work will be managed.

and stakeholders. While they may seem time-consuming to develop, in most cases these processes only need to be created once. Once

you have a set of processes that enable you to be successful.

The procedures mentioned can be recycled for future projects and can be implemented at either the company or organization level. They are derived from the procedures used for large-scale projects and should be modified to fit the specific requirements of your project.

For smaller undertakings, the procedures should be simplified for your squad and your organization.

Although this template is named Project Management Procedures, it actually provides a description of procedures. Procedures are at a higher level than processes. They can be transformed into processes by specifying the specific functions, individuals, and dates that are relevant.

The project execution process will cover various aspects such as team management, scope change, risk assessment, quality control, communication methods, and more.

Efficiently and proactively managing the project and ensuring a shared understanding among the project team and stakeholders is crucial. Utilize your organization's existing procedures for your specific project. A project team is essential for completing any project that involves multiple individuals, so it is vital to build a motivated one.

The success of the project relies heavily on selecting the right team members and gaining their dedication to the project's goals. If there are necessary skills that are not available, alternative sources must be found and pursued. Books, educational programs, the internet, and human interaction all work together to complete the project.

By using these aids, unexpected errors and miscalculations will be reduced. Additionally, coordination will also reduce the time required for the project to be successful (Wideman, 1991). The IS Auditing Procedure for Firewalls involves auditing the level of information security in an organization.

When it comes to scrutinizing information

security, there are various types of audits with different aims. These audits typically categorize the controls being audited into proficient, physical, and administrative aspects. Auditing information security involves examining the physical security of information centers, reviewing the logical security of databases, and identifying key components to focus on. There are also different methods available for conducting audits in these areas.

When focused on the IT aspects of information security, an information engineering audit can be seen. It is often called an information engineering security audit or a computer security audit. However,

Information security involves more than just IT. In many ways, application security and segregation of responsibilities are interconnected and share the same goal: to safeguard the integrity of company data and prevent fraud. Application security focuses on preventing unauthorized access to hardware and software by implementing appropriate physical and electronic security measures.

With the division of responsibilities, the main focus is on physically assessing individuals' access to systems and processing to ensure that there are no overlaps that could lead to fraud (Isaca, 2003). The key elements involved in completing projects and conducting post-project assessments are as follows:

  1. Identify termination activities in the baseline program.
  2. Verify that all agreed-upon deliverables have been provided.
  3. Organize and document project-related documentation.
  4. Ensure that all payments have been received from the client.
  5. Ensure that all payments for materials and subcontractors have been made.
  6. Prepare a written performance evaluation for each member of the project team.

The process of ending a project should always involve auditing resources used and properly evaluating the workforce (Isaca, 2003).

Return to the project plan to investigate the suitable equilibrium between resource utilization and project sustainability that directly aligns with project objectives. Additionally, validate or demonstrate that all agreed-upon deliverables were adequately detailed. Lastly, record and organize all documents pertaining to the project.

4. The client should have received all bills. All collectables should be received before closing the review. 5.

Payments for items and subcontractors must be made. Additionally, the performance of the project team should be evaluated and documented properly. Postmortem or project evaluation meetings should be conducted. To address projects that have been terminated or suspended, it is recommended to hire a new principal investigator (PI) or a similar individual.

In order to ensure a smooth flow of papers and procedures, the old PI should develop a new hire. The loss of human support and other valuable resources, whether expected or unexpected, often forces an organization to end or pause a project. Addressing this challenge is crucial.

The affected organization should have the ability to utilize other resources such as support vehicles and connections or networks for new hires or experts. If an internal evaluation or assessment of the project revealed negative results, resources, procedures, and even the project itself can be altered or modified to achieve set expectations and goals.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New