Physical Chemistry – Kinetic Theory of Gases – Flashcards

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers
question
A gas:
answer
A fluid state of matter that fills any container, is easily compressed, mixes with any gas, and exerts pressure on its surroundings.
question
Properties:
answer
Static properties - pressure p, volume v, temperature T Transport - diffusion/effusion, viscosity Thermal - heat capacity Chemical - reactions between gases
question
Boyle's Law
answer
*[ V α 1/p ]* At constant temperature, the volume of a fixed mass of gas is inversely proportional to its pressure.
question
Charles' Law
answer
*[ V α T ]* At constant pressure, the volume of a fixed mass of gas is directly proportional to its temperature measured on the Kelvin scale. Implies minimum temperature (absolute 0) OR *[ p α T ]* At constant volume, p=constant x T i.e. p->0 as T->0 (limiting law)
question
Combining Results:
answer
pV = constant V = constant x T p = constant x T All molar volumes of gases should be the same: Vm = V/n or V = constant x n pV/T = constant => pV = constant x T
question
Value of constant:
answer
Under standard conditions defined as S.T.P. P = 1 atm = 101 325 Pa T = 273.16 K (triple point of water) Volume of 1 mole of an ideal gas = 22.414 dm^3 constant = pV/nT = (101325 x 22.414)/(1 x 273.16) = 8.31441 J/(K mol) = Gas constant, R *[ Ideal gas equation => pV = nRT ]* Boltzmann constant, k = R/NA (per molecule)
question
Assumptions of the 'Kinetic Theory of Gases'
answer
1) Gas consists of molecules of mass m and diameter d in ceaseless, random motion 2) Volume occupied by molecules is negligible compared to the volume of the gas 3) Molecules do not interact with one another, with the exception of perfectly elastic collisions (overall energy conserved)
question
Predicting Pressure
answer
*Pressure = Force/Area* *Force = Rate of change of momentum = m(v-u)/t*
question
Momentum
answer
Momentum = mv (vector quantity) Imagine a molecule travelling at a velocity v colliding with a wall (elastic collision) v = [(vx)^2 + (vy)^2]^(1/2) vx = horizontal component vy = vertical component before collision: component towards wall (horizontal) Momentum = m(vx) after collision: component towards wall Momentim = -m(vx) [moving away from the wall with the same speed as energy is conserved] *Change in momentum (molecule) = -m(vx)-m(vx) = -2m(vx)* *Change in momentum (moles) = -2M(vx)*
question
Molecules Hitting the Wall
answer
In a given time Δt a molecule travels a distance vxΔt along the x axis. So, all molecules at a distance vxΔt or less travelling towards the wall will reach the wall in Δt In 3D: For a unit area A of wall, molecules have to be in a 'collision volume' of vxΔtA. *number of molecules per unit volume = (n x Na)/V* *number in 'collision volume': (vx.Δt.A.n.Na)/V* approximately 50% of the molecules are travelling towards the wall, therefore: *[ number of molecules colliding with the wall in a time Δt = (vx.Δt.A.n.Na)/2V ]*
question
Change in Momentum
answer
Total change in momentum = number of collisions x Δ(mv)/collision = (vx.Δt.A.n.Na)/2V x 2M(vx) [note m.Na = M] Rate of change of momentum = total change/Δt = (n.M.A.(vx)^2)/V = force pressure = force/area *[ Pressure = (n.M.(vx)^2)/V ]*
question
Average
answer
Molecules have a range of vx Pressure should depend on average (vx)^2 => Random motion of molecules i.e. no net flow in one direction => = = Mean square speed of molecules c^2 = + + = 3 = (c^2)/3 Thus, our model predicts: *[ p = (m.M.c^2)/(3V) or pV = (1/3)(n.M.c^2) ]*
question
Comparing Model with Experimental results
answer
Experimental: pV = nRT Model: pV = (1/3)(n.M.c^2) Thus, if c^2 depends only on Tm then at constant T model predicts pV = constant Model also implies RT = (1/3)M.c^2 Hence, mean square speed, *c^2 = (3RT)/M* => root mean square (r.m.s.) speed: *c=(3RT/M)^(1/2) = (3kT/m)^(1/2)*
question
Kinetic Energy
answer
For one molecule, kinetic energy = (1/2)mv^2 Total kinetic energy = N.(1/2)mv^2 Model predicts -> pV = (1/3)nMc^2 (nM=Nm) so, pV =(1/3)Nmc^2 this implies that pV = (2/3)(k.e.) or k.e.= (3/2)pV For our ideal gas, pV=nRT, therefore: *[ k.e. = (3/2)nRT ]* Translational energy is the only energy for our ideal model gas As c^2 = + + k.e. = N(1/2)M(vx)^2 + N(1/2)M(vy)^2 + N(1/2)M(vz)^2 as (vx)^2 = (vy)^2 = (vz)^2 Total k.e. = (3/2)nRT k.e for each translational degree of freedom = (1/2)nRT
question
Molecular Speeds
answer
Molecules collide many times in their constant motion, therefore molecular speeds are wide ranging. We show the range of speeds as a *probability density/distribution function*
question
Maxwell Distribution
answer
probability distribution funtion showing range of speeds of molecules, the Maxwell distribution: *[ f(s) = 4π(m/2πkT)^(3/2).(s^2)exp(-ms^2/2kT) ]* distribution not symmetrical peak of f(s) -> most probable speed, s* Experimental verification of the Maxwell distribution: experiments use a velocity selector - only molecules with specific speeds make it through the slots of the rotating discs to the detector As T is increased, peak value of s increases and probability decreases As M is increased, peak value of s decreases and probability increases
question
Most Probable Speed, s*
answer
As Maxwell distribution is asymmetric, most probable speed, s* is less than mean speed, which is less that mean square speed, s* < < s* can be found by differentiating f(s) and setting it equal to 0 i.e. df(s)/ds = 0 Use product rule f'(s) = 4π(m/2πkT)^(3/2)[(s^2)(-ms/2kT).exp(-ms/2kT) + 2s.exp (-ms/2kT)]
question
Mean Speed, and Mean Square Speed
answer
= ∫ s.f(s) ds (limits -∞ to ∞) *[ = (8kT/πm)^(1/2) ]* = ∫ s^2.f(s) ds (limits -∞ to ∞)
question
Molecular Collisions
answer
The Maxwell distrivution shows that = (8kT/πm)^(1/2) Considering collisions we need relative mean speed, srel = rel Relative speeds? Two extremes: -two molecules travelling in the same direction with the same => rel = 0 -two molecules travelling in opposite directions with the same => rel = 2 For everything in between, need to consider the mean direction of approach of molecules Mean speed of approach: resolve molecular (speed) velocity into two components (a) => (a^2) + (a^2) = ^2 2(a^2) = ^2 a = /√2 therefore, component of mean speed towards other molecule = /√2 hence, mean relative speed = 2/√2 = √2/
question
Reduced Mass
answer
if molecules have different masses, we have to use reduced mass, μ: *μ = mAmB/(mA+mB)* if mA = mB μ=(mA^2)/2 = (8kT/πm)^(1/2) rel = √2(8kT/πm)^(1/2) rel = (8kT/πμ)^(1/2)
question
Collisions Between Molecules
answer
Imagine all molecules, except one are static. Give the moving molecule a speed rel. So, in a time Δt, our molecule effectively travels a distance rel.Δt The molecule will hit any other molecule when the centre separation of the molecules is d (diameter of the molecule) The molecule thus sweeps out a 'collision tube' oh diameter 2d (radius d) and length rel.Δt The molecule will hit any other molecule in the collision tube Cross-sectional area of tube = πd^2 = σ Volume of tube = σl = σ.rel.Δt Number of collisions made by one molecule in time Δt = σ.rel.Δt. (N/V) Number of collisions made by one molecule per unit time = σ.rel.(N/V) *[ ZA = σ.√2.(N/V) = σ.√2.(P/kT) ]* {pV = NkT} Mean Free Path If a molecule collides at a frequency ZA Time between collisions = 1/ZA Distance between collisions = /ZA = λ (mean free path) Total number of collisions= ZA(NA/2V) {divide by 2 to avoid double counting} *[ ZAA = ZA(1/2kT) ]*
question
Collision Between Different Molecules
answer
Collisions for one molecule of A in gas B Collision cross-section, σAB = π((da +db)/2)^2 ZB = σAB.rel.(N/V) *[ ZAB = ZB(Na/2V) ]* {number of collisions between A and B molecules per unit time per unit volume}
question
Applications of Collision Frequency
answer
Collision frequency is used in developing a theory to explain kinetics (rates) of reactions. Why are kinetics important? - Allows us to understand/test reaction mechanisms - Allows us to apply reactions e.g environentally, industrually
question
Gas Phase Reaction Kinetics
answer
For a reaction: aA + bB -> cC + dD The rate of reaction is * [ r = (-1/a).(d[A]/dt) = (-1/b).(d[B]/dt) = (+1/a).(d[C]/dt) = (+1/d).(d[D]/dt) ]* Experimentally: *[ r = k.[A]^α.[B]^β ]* k: rate constant α: orders of reaction for A β: orders of reaction for B {Experimentally determined} Overall order of reaction: α + β If a reaction is elementary (single step), order of reaction = molecularity (number of molecules taking part) A -> products (unimolecular) A + B -> products (bimolecular) A + B +C -> products (termolecular) An elementary bimolecular reaction in the gas phase can be considered as a collision process.
question
Collision Theory for Reaction Rates
answer
Two assumptions made: 1) The reactants must collide 2) On collision the reactants must have enough energy to react (so, for A + B -> products) *[ Theoretical rate reaction = collision frequency (ZAB) x Fraction of molecules with enough energy to react ]*
question
The Boltzmann Distrbution
answer
To find the fraction with enough energy to react we must look at the probability distribution function for energies i.e. the Boltzmann distribution *f(E) = (1/kT)exp(-E/kT)* Look at area under the curve above E = ε, where ε is the minimum energy needed for the molecules to react. => ∫ f(E) dE (limits ε to +∞) = exp(-ε/kT)
question
Theoretical and Experimental Rate of Reaction
answer
Theoretical rate = ZAB x exp(-ε/kT) = σAB.rel.(NB/V).(NA/2V).exp(-ε/kT) {NA and NB are number of molecules} = (σAB.rel.[B][A].NA^2)(exp(-ε/kT))/2 {NA = Avagadro's number} Experimental rate = k[A][B] Hence, theory predicts that: *[ k = (σAB.rel.NA^2)(exp(-ε/kT))/2 ]*
question
Experimental Rate Constant vs. T
answer
Many reactions show a rate constant that follows the Arrheinius equations: *[ A.exp(Ea/RT) ]* {A = pre-exponential factor, Ea = activation energy} Theoretical k = (σAB.rel.NA^2)(exp(-ε/kT))/2 therefore *[ A = σAB.rel.NA^2/2 ]* Steric Factors: Collision theory usually overestimates the experimental reaction rate, because molecules do not always react on collisions (as molecules must be correctly oriented) The steric factor, P is defined as *[ P = Aexperimental/Atheoretical ]* usually, P<1 as Aexperimental<Atheoretical
question
Effusion
answer
The emergence of gas from a small hole in a container. Treat this in the same way as 'how many molecules hit a given area of wall' In a time Δt, molecules travel a distance vxΔt in the direction towards the wall. So for an area A of wall, molecules in a collision tube of vxΔt hit the wall . We need to use the mean vx, going towards the wall Use a probability distribution function f(vx) = ∫vx.f(vx) dvx (limits -∞ to +∞) f(vx) = (m/2πkT)^(1/2).exp(-m(vx)^2/2kT) {this differs from the speed distribution} vx can be + or - only count positive vx = (kT/2πm)^1/2 Number of molecules hitting the wall: *Zw = ΔtA(N/V)/AΔt = (N/V) = (N/V)(kT/2πm)^(1/2) = (p/kT)(kT/2πm)^(1/2) = p/(kT2πm)^(1/2)* *[ Zw = (N/V) x (rel/4) = (p/kT) x (rel/4) ]*
question
Graham's Law of Effusion
answer
Graham's law states that the rate of effusion of a gas from a small hole is inversely proportional to (molar mass)^(1/2) If the wall has hole in it of area A0: *Rate of effusion = Zw.A0 =p.A0/(kT2πm)^(1/2) =p.A0.L/(MRT2π)^(1/2)* {m = M/L, k = R/L} Knudsen applied Graham's law to measure (very low) vapour pressures of solids/liquids by measuring loss of mass, Δm by effusion in a time Δt *[ Δm = Zw.A0.m.Δt ]* {Zw.A0 = rate of loss of molecules, m = molecular mass} Zw = Δm/(A0.m.Δt) = p/(2kTπm)^(1/2) {rearrange} p = (Δm/A0.m.Δt) (2kTπm)^(1/2) *[ p = (Δm/A0.m.Δt) (2kTπ/m)^(1/2) ]* *[ p = (Δm/A0.m.Δt) (2RTπ/M)^(1/2) ]*
question
Real Gases and the Compression Factor, Z
answer
Real gases deviate from perfect behaviour Z = p(Vm)/RT {Vm = molar volume, Vm = V/n} For an ideal gas, Z = 1 low pressures - real gases behave like ideal gases i.e Z~1 moderate pressures - *long range attractive forces* draw molecules together, hence *Z1* Z also depends on mean speeds of molecules low T (or high M) slow moving molecules are more readily captured by one another i.e. Z1 At the Boyle temperature, TB (an intermediate temperature), a real gas behaves ideally over a range of p
question
The Virial Coefficients
answer
At large Vm and high T (low p) gas behaves more ideally At small Vm and low T (high p) behaviour is non-ideal So, P(Vm) = RT can be expanded to account for non-ideality: *[ p(Vm) = RT(1 + B'p + C'p^2) ]* *[ p(Vm) = RT(1+B/(Vm) + C/(Vm)^2) ]* There are versions of the virial equations p(Vm) = RT(1+B/(Vm) + C/(Vm)^2) +... {1st virial coefficient = 1, 2nd virial coefficient = B, 3rd virial coefficient = C} Virial coefficients are dependent on T At typical molar volumes B/(Vm) >> C/(Vm)^2) Virial equations predict Z = p(Vm)/RT = 1 when (Vm) -> ∞ (p -> 0) The slope of Z with p (or 1/(Vm)) differs in virial equations *For an ideal gas: Z = 1, dZ/dp = 0 For a real gas Z = 1 + B'p + C'p^2+..., dZ/dp = B' + 2C'P Z= 1+B/(Vm) + C/(Vm)^2) +..., dZ/dp = B + 2C/(Vm) = B as (Vm) -> ∞* The slope of Z with p or 1/(Vm) is 0 when B=0 at the Boyle temperature, TB, B(TB)=0
question
Condensation
answer
At low temperatures (below Tc) increasing the p of a gas can lead to liquefaction or even solidification {Tc is the critical T (critical isotherm): Lowest T at which liquid phase can form by compression} above Tc a fluid which fills the entire volume exists, often the fluid is denser than a gas. The critical pressure (pc), volume (vc) and temperature (Tc) are constants for a given gas.
question
The van der Waals equation
answer
A more realistic model of the gas based on p(Vm) = RT It takes into account: 1) The volume of the gas molecules themselves Volume = Vm - b hence p = RT/(Vm-b) 2) The reduction of the pressure due to: attractive forces between the molecules reducing the *frequency* and *force* of collisions, both α (1/Vm) Hence reduction in p is a/(Vm^2) Thus *[ p = RT/(Vm-b) - a/(Vm^2) ]* or for n moles of gas *[ mRT/(V-nb) - an^2/v^2 ]* as {Vm = V/n} a and b depend only on the nature of the gas, these can be linked to virial coefficients B and C
question
Molecular Interactions
answer
Look at potential energy of interaction U(R) as a function of molecular separation, R For the 'hard sphere' model, p.e. = 0 until molecules collide. The model molecules are impenetrable spheres, the p.e. of interaction is ∞ at R < 0 where σ = d (in this case)
question
Improvements to the Potential
answer
The simplest improvement is the square well potential. The model still uses hard spheres, but allows the total p.e to be lowered by ε at intermediate values of R. This model accounts for the complex formation , and the existence of condensed phases (liquids and solids)
question
Realistic Potential Energy of Interactions
answer
We must consider the nature of the forces between molecules - Repulsive forces: when molecules are close together the electrons and nuclei of the different molecules repel one another (+ deshielding). Hence, the potential energy goes up with smaller R: * [ Urepulsion(R) = Aexp(-BR) ]* {A and B are constants} - Attractive Forces: At large separation molecules attract one another. Polar molecules do this by Coulombic attraction. Non-polar molecules do so because of: 1) e- motion => instantaneous dipole 2) the molecule polarises a second molecule and there is an attraction 3) induced dipole The attractive interaction between molecules is known as a dispersion interaction or a London interaction. This depends on: 1) The polarisability of molecules (α) 2) The extent of control of the nucleus over the outer electrons (Ionisation energy) (I) 3) And most importantly - on separation (R) Hence, we write: *[ Urepulsion(R) = -C6/R^6 ]* This is the London formula
question
The Total Interaction
answer
The overall effect of the attractive and repulsive potentials is obtained as the sum. As an approximation the exponential repulsive part is replaced by R^-12 Hence: *[ Urepulsiion(R) ~ C12/R^12 ]* Thus: *[ Utotal(R) = C12/R^12 - C6/R^6 ]* {C6 and C12 are constants}
question
The Lennard-Jones Potential
answer
A more realistic potential energy to interactions of two molecules: *[ U(R) - 4ε(σ^12/R^12 - σ^6-R^6) ]* {ε = well depth - minimum p.e. of interaction σ = separation when U(R) = 0 i.e. V(σ) = 0} σ0 = zero potential separation, separation at minimum potential ε can be calculated, because at the minimum: dU(R)/dR = 0 The force between molecules, F = -dU(R)/dR hence, at ε, F=0 general expression for force: *[ F = (24ε/σ)[2(σ/R)^(13) - (σ/R)^(7)] ]* {from differentiations} The attractive force maximises at R = (26/7)^(1/6)σ The Lennard-Jones parameters allow calculation of virial coefficients, hence non-ideality can be predicted This is often called the Lennard Jones 12-6 potential
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New