Medical Ethics: Week 1 Vaughn
Unlock all answers in this set
Unlock answersquestion
study of morality using the tools and methods of philosophy
answer
Ethics
question
empirical facts of morality
answer
descriptive ethics
question
search for and justification of moral standards or norms
answer
normative ethics
question
How we decide what ought to be done?
answer
normative ethics
question
the use of moral norms to resolve practical moral issues
answer
applied ethics
question
fundamental meaning of ethics... how do we have norms in the first place?
answer
metaethics
question
common morality assumes there are objective moral standards that are inherently true and therefore true for everyone
answer
Moral objectivism
question
states that there are no objective standards, moral values are relative to what we believe
answer
moral relativism
question
moral values are based on personal belief. Anything that anyone believes is right; therefore, there are no moral values
answer
subjective relativism
question
different cultures have different moral judgments and moral norms are relative to culture
answer
cultural relativism
question
common morality, inherent
answer
moral norms
question
normative dominance, universality, impartiality, reasonableness
answer
characteristics of moral norms
question
moral norms take precedence over other norms
answer
normative dominance
question
apply in all relevantly similar situations
answer
universality
question
everyone is treated the same unless there is a morally relevant difference
answer
impartiality
question
result of careful reflection in which we arrive at good reasons for accepting them
answer
reasonableness
question
at least one statement (premise) providing support for another statement (conclusion)
answer
argument
question
give logically conclusive support to their conclusions and are valid or invalid
answer
deductive arguments
question
give probable support to their conclusions and are strong or weak
answer
inductive arguments
question
straw man, appeal to the person, appeal to ignorance, begging the question, slippery slope
answer
common fallacies in moral arguments
question
not presenting the opposing case well... presenting the opposing case weakly and subsequently tearing it down
answer
straw man
question
devaluing the argument because you devalue the person
answer
appeal to the person
question
if don't know something is wrong, it must be true
answer
appeal to ignorance
question
assuming the conclusion to be true in premises without ever showing it
answer
begging the question
question
if we do this, these things are going to happen, so we shouldn't do this
answer
slippery slope
question
applies in all cases unless an exception is warranted... weighing of duties that come in conflict
answer
prima facie
question
autonomy, beneficence, utility, and justice
answer
essentials of moral principles
question
self-governance, self-determination
answer
autonomy
question
we should do good to others and avoid doing them harm... active (advance others' welfare) and nonmaleficence (not to intentionally inflict harm)
answer
beneficence
question
we should produce the most favorable balance of good over bad for all concerned
answer
utility
question
getting what is fair or what is their due
answer
justice
question
affirming the antecedent, denying the consequent
answer
valid arguments
question
if p, then q p therefore, q
answer
affirming the antecedent
question
if p, then q not q therefore, not p
answer
denying the consequent
question
affirming the consequent, denying the antecedent
answer
invalid arguments
question
if p, then q q therefore, p
answer
affirming the consequent
question
if p, then q not p therefore, not q
answer
denying the antecedent
question
gives an explanation for why we consider an action to be right or wrong or a person to be good ar bad
answer
moral theory
question
why we believe what we believe and how we get to our conclusions
answer
moral theory
question
duties and things are inherently right or wrong (Kant)
answer
deontological
question
consequences from the action are important
answer
consequential
question
1700s, sought to devise a system of morality purely based on reason with a fundamental categorical imperative and not just hypothetical imperatives.
answer
Immanuel Kant
question
a moral statement or command that was not dependent on the circumstances
answer
fundamental categorical imperative
question
dependent on circumstances
answer
hypothetical imperatives
question
"act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law" and "act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end"
answer
kant's categorical imperative
question
Jeremy Bentham, late 1700s to 1800s and John Stuart Mill, 1800s, and Peter Singer, current. Right actions are those that maximize the utility for everyone involved
answer
Utilitarianism
question
utility of each individual acts is maximized
answer
act-utilitarianism
question
rule are devised which result in maximal utility when they are followed
answer
rule-utilitarianism
question
John Rawls, principles of justice can be generated from an idealized contract that members of a society would agree to in hypothetical conditions that ensure fair and unbiased choices... involves the veil of ignorance
answer
Contractarianism
question
aristotle, Alasdair MacIntyre, focuses on the development of a virtuous character rather than determining the rightness of actions... moedling and living a virtuous life
answer
virtue ethics
question
what is right is determined by what God has commanded
answer
divine command theory
question
foundation of our common morality
answer
character of God
question
right actions conform to moral standards that are present within nature itself... self-evident truth, nature is teleological, and intrinsic nature of how things are can indicate how things should be
answer
natural law theory
question
used in natural law theory, intentions are more important than consequences
answer
double effect
question
consistency with our common morality. consistency with facts of the moral life. resourcefulness in moral problem-solving.
answer
Vaughn's criteria for judging moral theories
question
moral principles are based on some sort of moral theory or understanding of common morality even if not always articulated. principles can be absolute or prima facie. Tom L. Beacuchamp and James F. Childress constructed the widely accepted system of ethical principles used in bioethics.... involves the 4 principles
answer
moral principles in bioethics