Gerrymandering in United States Essay Example

for their preferred candidate, thereby reducing their political impact (Etats-Unis. Constitution & Celler, 1966). According to the initial part of the 22nd amendment in the Constitution, no person can be elected president more than two times. Additionally, individuals who have served as president for over two terms may potentially wield authority akin to de-facto monarchs.

"There is a concern that Roosevelt's four election victories may allow people to undermine the well-known democratic legacy, preventing others with leadership abilities from reaching the presidency and ultimately leading to a dictatorship (Grofman, 2007). The court utilizes judicial review to analyze whether a treaty, statute, or administrative action violates the current laws outlined in the U.S Constitution. Decisions made by the U.S Supreme Court hold significant constitutional authority, requiring the court to engage in reviewing the judicial process for examining claims."

After the examination, the court concluded that the carriage act would be deemed constitutional. This marked the beginning of the Supreme Court's role in hearing cases and asserting judicial authority. Chief Justice John Marshall upheld the court's responsibilities. The legislation that was found unconstitutional was overturned due to its consequences. Bipartisan gerrymandering refers to redistricting that benefits both political parties, primarily within the two-party system of the United States.

Since the year 2000, it has become a common practice that the most noncompetitive redistricting strategies in the United States (Etats-Unis. Constitution & Celler, 1966) are constitutional. This means that Americans are well represented by the two party systems (bipartisan) under the equal protection clause. Therefore, it is evident that gerrymandering only offers limited opportunities to influence political outcomes.

Partisan gerrymandering aims to secure more positions by redirecting one party, resulting in

short-term benefits. However, the impact tends to diminish as significant shifts in the executives occur. In the event of such shifts, the gerrymandering party can use it to redraw districts. They employ the tactic of creating oddly-shaped districts to divide opposition votes. Nonetheless, partisan gerrymandering has detrimental effects on polarization. Its main objective is not to enhance safety but rather to gain a stronghold.

Bipartisan gerrymandering results in polarization by endeavoring to satisfy both factions within each party, necessitating participation from both minority and majority districts. However, these consequences are confined to specific communities, and it is evident that judicial review has been incorporated into the U.S. Constitution.

Both the proponent and opponent of this review do not require any mechanism to prevent the enforcement of laws that disrupt the constitution at this level. The act of gerrymandering disperses these opposing groups among different districts, resulting in a loss of voting power for both sides.

References

• Etats-Unis. Constitution., & In Celler, E. (1966). The Constitution of the United States of America. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.
• Grofman, B. (2007). Political Gerrymandering and the Courts.

New York: Algora Pub.

The publication was done by Algora Pub in New York.