The ?onstitution Ratification Debates Essay Example
The ?onstitution Ratification Debates Essay Example

The ?onstitution Ratification Debates Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 3 (721 words)
  • Published: April 11, 2022
View Entire Sample
Text preview

The United States constitution, crafted by the founding fathers in 1787 at the Philadelphia convention, proved to be a challenging task during the ratification process as it involved transitioning from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution of the United States.

The process of addressing the flaws in the Articles of Confederation proved challenging and involved lengthy debates. However, it was necessary to make changes in order for the states to collaborate effectively. The weaknesses included: each state having only one vote regardless of size, lack of an executive branch to enforce laws, absence of a national court system, Congress lacking authority over taxation and interstate commerce regulation, unanimous vote requirement for amending the Articles, and nine out of thirteen states required to pass laws in Congress (The Staff of Congressional Quarterly 32). These weaknesses caused conflicts that a

...

rose when the founding fathers were signing the constitution in 1787; they agreed that ratification would require the votes of at least nine states out of thirteen.

In the ratification debates, there were opposing views held by the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were in favor of ratifying the Constitution, while the Anti-Federalists opposed it. Their main disagreement centered around whether or not to include the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. The Federalists objected to its inclusion because they believed that the Constitution already limited government power rather than individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists argued that without including the Bill of Rights, excessive power would be given to the central government, which could result in oppression (Brown and Timothy 191; Dye and Zeigler 45).

In Rhode Island, opposition to the constitution was strong and resulte

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

in intense resistance that nearly led to a civil war on July 4th, 1788. Judge William West was instrumental in rallying a thousand armed protesters alongside other Anti-Federalist members in Providence. This division of views saw Alexander Hamilton and James Madison representing the Federalists, who argued against including the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. They believed such inclusion would limit people's rights instead of protecting them. On the contrary, Anti-Federalists expressed concerns that omitting the Bill of Rights would endanger people's liberties and make the Constitution ineffective at safeguarding their rights. They also feared that a stronger central government would encroach on state sovereignty, comparing it to Great Britain from which they had fought for liberation (Brown and Timothy 193).

The Anti-Federalists raised concerns about potential violations of freedoms such as freedom of speech and trial by jury. They also worried that the national government, due to the country's size, would struggle to address the needs of the people at state and local levels. Moreover, they believed that federal courts located far away would face difficulties in ensuring justice for all citizens. On the other hand, the Federalists contended that federal courts had limited jurisdiction, with state and local courts handling most legal matters. Interestingly, it was the Federalists who proposed the Bill of Rights to Congress for approval despite their previous opposition.

If the Federalists had not compromised, the ratification process may not have taken place. The majority of Federalists who supported Constitution ratification were wealthy and well-educated, having considerable power thanks to influential figures such as George Washington and Benjamin Franklin. They had a particular interest in politics and aimed to establish a strong

and centralized government. To advocate for this cause, they created influential political writings known as the Federalist papers that highlighted the significance of a centralized government in earning international respect for the United States (Brown and Timothy 201). In contrast, most Anti-Federalists came from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, with many being farmers or debtors primarily concerned about the economic status of average citizens.

The framers were primarily concerned about the potential for excessive power in the central government, specifically when it came to taxation and its potential negative effects on ordinary citizens. That is why they insisted on including the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, aiming to safeguard the rights and freedoms of the people.

Works Cited

  1. Brown, Victoria, and Timothy J. Shannon. Going to the Source: The Bedford Reader in American History. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2012. Print.
  2. Dye, Thomas R., and L H. Zeigler. The Irony of Democracy: An Uncommon Introduction to American Politics.

Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2009. Print.

The Staff of Congressional Quarterly. Concise Encyclopedia of Democracy. 2013. Print.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New