Fraser AP Government Chapter 18 – Flashcards

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers
question
Clear and Present Danger test
answer
A Supreme Court formula to legitimate the abridgement of the right of free speech.
question
Communist control Act
answer
A 1954 act denying legal rights to the Communist Party.
question
Conscientious objector
answer
One who refuses military service based upon religious belief or moral grounds.
question
creationism
answer
A teaching on the origin of the world found to be religiously inspired.
question
due process clause
answer
Protection against arbitrary deprivation of life, liberty, or property as guaranteed in the fifth and 14th amendment.
question
establishment clause
answer
The First amendment clause prohibiting an official religion.
question
exclusionary rule
answer
The prohibition against athe use of illegally obtained evidence in court.
question
free exercise clause
answer
Thre first amendment clause guaranteeing religious freedom.
question
freedom of expression
answer
Part of the First Amendment protecting the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition.
question
freedom of religion
answer
Part of the first amendment protecting the free exercise of religion and prohibiting an establishment of religion.
question
good faith exception
answer
Admission of illegally obtained evidence if illegality results from a technical or minor error.
question
Internal Security Act
answer
A 1950 act requiring the registration of all communists.
question
Least means
answer
The use of only minimal means to restrict potentially dangerous expression.
question
libel
answer
Harming one another by publishing defamatory statements.
question
McCarthyism
answer
Originated during communist witch-hunt in the 1950s, unfair accusations that tarnish a person's reputation.
question
Miranda
answer
A supreme Court case that led to rules that police officers must follow in warning arrested persons of their rights.
question
preferred position
answer
The supposed superiority of rights of expression over other constitutional rights.
question
prior restraint
answer
A government action to prevent rather than punish certain expressions.
question
probable cause
answer
The legal basis for the issuance of a search warrant.
question
Red Scare
answer
The government suppression of AMerican leftists after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
question
search warrant
answer
A written authorization to police officers to conduct a search.
question
Sedition Act
answer
A Federalist bill of 1789 criminalizing criticism of the government.
question
Smith Act (1940)
answer
A 1940 act criminalizing the advocacy of violent revolution.
question
Symbolic speech
answer
An act that conveys a political message, such as burning a draft card to protest the draft.
question
Wall of separation principle
answer
An interpretation of part of the First Amendment that prevents government involvement with religion.
question
civil liberties
answer
Those protections enjoyed by all Americans form the abuse of government power.
question
Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
answer
The Bill of Rights restricts the Federal but not the State governments.
question
Gitlow v. New York (1925)
answer
State limits on speech and press could not exceed that set by the federal government. Begins selective incorporation.
question
Selective incorporation
answer
Courts apply the bill of rights on a state by state basis. Gitlow v. New York
question
Bad Tendency doctrine
answer
Gitlow v. New York- speech can be restricted if it leads to illegal action.
question
Schenk v. U.S. (1919)
answer
Created the clear and present danger test. Language that presents a clear and present danger is not protected by the constitution. WWI case involving leaflets telling people not to support the draft.
question
Dennis v. U.S. (1951)
answer
The federal government can limit speech even if it did not lead to action. Upholds the Smith Act against communist groups.
question
TInker v. Des Moines (1969)
answer
Students were suspended for wearing black arm bands in school in protest of the Vietnam war. The court ruled that the type of protest was legal and that students don't lose their constitutional rights at the school door.
question
Brandenbug v. Ohio (1969)
answer
A man was jailed for a KKK speech. The court ruled that he cannot be jailed unless his speech will lead to imminent lawless action.
question
Bethel School v. Fraser (1986)
answer
Schools can suspend students for speech considered lewd or indecent.
question
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
answer
Burning the flad is and example of permissible free speech.
question
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)
answer
Certain types of speech called "fighting words" could be prohibited.
question
Virginia v. Black (2002)
answer
Cross burning amounts to fighting words and is thus unconstitutional.
question
prior restraint
answer
Government's effort to prevent publication of information. The court ruled it unconstitutional ruling that public's need to be well informed outweighed the security issues.
question
Shield Laws
answer
On the state level, reporters may be protected from revealing their sources but on the federal level they are not so may go to jail.
question
Miller v. California (1973)
answer
Established a three part obscenity test because libel and obscenity are not protected free speech.
question
Near v. Minnesota (1931)
answer
Incorporates freedom of the press and prevents prior restraint.
question
New York Times v. Sullivan (1964)
answer
If a newspaper printed what it thought to be true at the time it is not guilty of libel.
question
New York Times v. U.S. ( 1971)
answer
The pentagon papers case where the U.S. government tried to block publication. The court rule that it violated the first amendment.
question
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
answer
School officials can regulate free speech in student run newspapers.
question
freedom of association
answer
Government may not restrict the number or type of groups or organizations people belong to provided those groups do not threaten national security.
question
Dejonge v. Oregon (1937)
answer
Assembly incorporated. Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime.
question
Thornhill v. Alabama (1940)
answer
Strikes by unions were not unlawful and do not constitute unlawful assembly.
question
Cox v. New Hampshire (1941)
answer
Cities and towns can require permits for assemblies to maintain order.
question
Lloyd Corporation v. Tanner (1972)
answer
Malls are private and not public spaces. Vietnam war protesters could be kicked out.
question
Boy Scout of America v. Dale (2002)
answer
Boy scout of America were allowed to kick out homosexual member because they are a private organization.
question
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
answer
Helps decide whether the establishment clause is violated. A three part test.
question
"Lemon" Test
answer
1) Does the law have a secular or religious purpose? 2) Does law neither promote nor prohibit religion. 3) Does the law avoid excessive entanglements of the govt. and religious institutions?
question
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
answer
Prohibited state sponsore prayer in public schools.
question
Abington v. Schempp (1963)
answer
Establishment clause forbids reading of the bible, or recitation of the Lord's prayer in public schools.
question
Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)
answer
Prohibited states from banning the teaching of evolution.
question
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
answer
Amish children may remove children from public schools for religious reasons.
question
Weeks v. U.S. (1914)
answer
Established the exclusionary rule which held that illegally obtained evidence may not be introduced in federal court.
question
Olmstead v. U.S. (1928)
answer
Allowed unlimited phone tapping. Said it did not violate illegal search and seizure.
question
Katz v. U.S. (1967)
answer
Wiretaps were made illegal without a warrant. Overturned Olmstead.
question
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
answer
State government must provide counsel in those cases involving the death penalty.
question
Betts v. Brady (1942)
answer
Overruled Powell saying that lawyers need not be provide lawyers to indigent defendents in capital cases.
question
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
answer
Overruled Betts v. Brady saying that all state governments must provide counsel in all cases for those that cannot afford one.
question
Mapp v. Ohio ( 1961)
answer
Extended the exclusionary rule to state cases as well.
question
Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)
answer
Defendents that asked for a lawyer had to have one granted or any confession would be inadmissible in court.
question
Oregon v. Elstad (1985)
answer
Confessions given before rights are read are admissible in court.
question
Furman v. Georgia (1972)
answer
The Supreme Court ruled that death penalty punishments be stopped until a better way could be found for sentencing because they were often racist and arbitrary.
question
Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
answer
Georgia convinced the court it had come up with a fair and careful system for trying capital offenses. This allowed resumption of the death penalty in the U.S.
question
Atkins v. Virginia (2002)
answer
Forbid the execution of defendants who are mentally retarded.
question
Implied right to privacy
answer
The court ruled that the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 9th and 14th amendments added up to a guarantee of privacy.
question
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
answer
The court ruled that certain amendment cast "penumbras and emanation" that show that the founders really wanted the right to privacy. The case said that state laws banning contraception were unconstitutional.
question
Roe v. Wade (1973)
answer
Right to privacy case that followed from the Griswold decision. Established guidelines for abortion.
question
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1987)
answer
Gave states more power to regulate abortion.
question
Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
answer
Parental consent and 24 hour waiting periods were upheld in regard to abortion. States could not place an undue burden upon women with regulations.
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New