The Perils Of Affirmative Action Analysis Essay Example

only 16 were reserved for black and other educationally and economically disadvantaged minorities.

Despite having higher scores than other admitted black students, Allan Bakke competed for the remaining 84 slots but was rejected. He sued the school and the California Court agreed. The school then appealed to the Supreme Court.

The increasing challenge in understanding and accepting Affirmative Action is evident. Even liberals recognize that this approach may lead to unfairness.

In 1986, Wygant noted that African-American employees retained their jobs despite having less experience compared to Caucasian employees who were laid off. More recently, Affirmative Action has been highlighted, including the Supreme Court confirming its legitimacy in higher education in 2003.

The decision is significant as it establishes the foundation for the implementation of Affirmative Action. The 2003 Michigan Cases acknowledged that Affirmative Action aims to promote diversity at all societal levels, thereby serving the Compelling State Interest.

During the analysis of SAT scores in the 1990s, researchers identified a similar situation. Byron Roth's research revealed that admission to prestigious US Colleges required a verbal portion score above 600. However, Roth also uncovered specific information that could potentially pose challenges for supporters of Affirmative Action.

Furthermore, the author addressed the disparities in test scores based on race. Only 2% of black students obtained a score exceeding 600, while 73% of Caucasians reached that threshold. The same pattern was evident in Math scores, with around 3% of black students surpassing 600 compared to 13% of white students (265).

The fairness of Affirmative Action's mandate to allocate slots to minorities is being questioned. Is it merely a recognition for

their hard work? Both Bakke and other Caucasians deserve equal treatment, just like minority groups. Providing preferential treatment solely based on race or membership in marginalized communities is considered unacceptable.

The society's perpetuation of negative stereotypes hampers the progress and resilience development. Taking a stand against discrimination and advocating for equality using appropriate methods is crucial.

The utilization of quotas in employment and academic admissions is a key aspect of Affirmative Action. While these quotas aim to foster fairness, there is evidence contradicting this notion. Paradoxically, individuals who are meant to benefit from Affirmative Action sometimes experience negative consequences.

There is a growing recognition among Jews and Asians that Affirmative Action negatively affects their chances of being admitted to academic programs (Swain 296). This is because the presence of reserved slots for other minority groups implies that not all highly qualified Jews and Asians can be accepted.

Despite the inclusion of Affirmative Action in the United States, it has not effectively addressed the exclusion predicament faced by African-Americans. It is crucial to recognize that the country's population comprises people from various racial backgrounds. The United States is widely known as a melting pot due to its diverse population.

Ensuring equal opportunity for all individuals, regardless of their skin color, is crucial to guarantee fair and unbiased treatment. It should be acknowledged that even Caucasians may face financial barriers when accessing education.