Off Duty Smoking Essay Example

same for an overweight person; and the same situation applies to people with tattoos. The world isn’t fair, and its survival of the fittest in the business world.

Does the job position being filled – floor manager – make any relevant difference in this case?

If not, can you think of a position where smoking would be relevant? I don’t think so. I do not believe that it matters what job a smoker is applying for, as long as they have self control. Smokers should know when it is an acceptable time to smoke, and when it isn’t. There wouldn’t be a problem if that person was a professional, and acted like one. There are people that abuse their “smoking privileges”. I personally hate smoking but as long as they don’t abuse their privileges on “smoking breaks” I would be okay with it.

I can’t discriminate against anyone, because I know there are habits of my own that some people I’m sure hate as well. Then of course, the biggest question of all comes up: What about the people that don’t smoke? A smoker takes a five minute “smoke break”, while a non-smoker also is allowed a five minute “smoke break”. Everyone should be treated equally, with no exceptions.

Should employers be free not to hire employees whose personal behaviors are considered high risk?

There is a difference between “high risk personal behaviors” and “personal behaviors that slow productivity”. High risk personal behaviors could range from: smoking to texting while driving. Personal behaviors are irrelevant as long as an employee can remain efficient for the company he or she is

working for. If an employee is not working to his or her greatest effectiveness, then a real and legitimist reason has risen as to why this person should not have been hired in the first place.

The challenge is: picking and choosing which people applying for the position, will do a better job after they are hired.

Should employers be able to resist employee’s high risk behavior? Why or why not? Putting a restriction on something is easy. Recommending and encouraging employees to not take part in these actions are the best option. The person will not feel as pressured to do those things and in turn, it leads to confidence inside of the employee because they feel as if they are trusted to do the right thing.

Self-confidence is something you have to have in a workplace. A manager could tell an employee of theirs to not smoke, and it might work. However if this employee has made a habit out of smoking, then eventually his mood will begin to change negatively, and this might lead to a negative effect on the rest of the crew. This in turn leads to a work environment that it dreadful by the other employees. In conclusion, the justification used by Rob is discrimination, and should not be accepted in any workforce department.