Critically Compare The Use Of VIDe Decision Making Software Essay Example
The concepts of ethics involve the basic principles, regulations, or ideals that underlie certain moral beliefs (Campbell and Higgs, 1982). The occurrence of ethical dilemmas happens when individuals seek to determine what is morally correct or incorrect, suitable or unsuitable, commendable or reprehensible, and beneficial or harmful (Goodman, 1998). This article analyzes and contrasts two domains of ethical investigation: Conventional Ethical Approaches and VIDe Decision-making Software.
The paper will examine case studies 102 and 109 and consider several ethical viewpoints regarding healthcare decision-making. There exist numerous philosophical theories that endeavor to elucidate moral status in this context, including Utilitarianism and Deontology. Utilitarianism has its roots in the ideas of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, emphasizing the importance of achieving maximum happiness or good for the most people possible. This theory prioritizes out
...comes over adherence to personal responsibility.
The obligation is to maximize happiness or pleasure and minimize suffering or pain, according to Campbell & Higgs (1982). Each situation must be judged on its own merits to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number. Case 102 exemplifies the utilitarian approach, where a compulsory vaccine could effectively address the meningococcal B epidemic and reduce the outbreak of meningitis disease for the majority.
Regarding public health, conflicts can arise between the choices of individuals and the greater good. Seedhouse (1998) illustrates this issue, highlighting the potential for a vaccination to carry a risk of adverse reaction that prevents an individual from transmitting a disease but not from catching it.
The focus is on the outcome of actions rather than strict adherence to rules. Utilitarianism prioritizes the happiness of the majority, disregarding the "rights" of the minority an
potentially denying them altogether (Campbell, Gillett, and Jones, 1992). Consequentialism, a recognized theory in ethics, posits that the consequences of an action determine its ethical status (Seedhouse, 1998). Nevertheless, this approach does not account for exceptional situations and eventually causes estrangement.
According to deontology, which is a theory about what's right and wrong, people have a duty to act in a certain way towards others, despite the outcomes. This means that rules should always be obeyed. Although it may not always be appropriate, deontology remains an intriguing and engrossing theory. For example, in Case 109, a therapist has an ethical responsibility to protect their patient's privacy with the utmost honesty.
The counsellor's duty is not only to prioritize the well-being of their client, including protection from any harm, but also to observe deontology principles. While deontology focuses on upholding people's rights, it can also result in harm and violations of their rights (Dunn, 1999). At the same time, deontology enables individuals to follow their moral values (Campbell, Gillett and Jones, 1992). In Case 109, for example, the counsellor might decide that the client's father has a right to know about his son's condition considering his minor age. However, this decision could unintentionally compromise the client's rights, rendering deontology inadequate.
Both utilitarianism and Kantian ethical theories have their limitations, as they rely respectively on consequence and intention. It is important to approach each situation carefully and empathetically, using one's best judgment when faced with difficult decisions, while also keeping in mind fundamental principles of right and wrong that are innate to all individuals (Dunn, 1999). The healthcare industry is quickly moving towards computational solutions, as evidenced by the
development of VIDe software in New Zealand (Goodman, 1998). This is changing the standards of information processing, decision-making, and overall care in the field.
According to The New Zealand Herald, VIDe was created to assist medical professionals and healthcare practitioners in making decisions that often require value systems and subjective judgments (Gregory, 2002). The VIDe software is user-friendly and easy to navigate, allowing individuals to engage in reflective decision-making processes. The program incorporates visual aids and uses simple language to provide context and enable users to express their thoughts. VIDe is helpful in comprehending case studies as it allows individuals to see how the decisions they make lead to various outcomes. The software also provides a basis in theory, aiding in understanding the reasoning behind certain decisions made in specific situations.
The VIDe software offers advantages over traditional ethical theories by allowing users to express their personal emotions and judgments. It also has the ability to create a comprehensive database for comparing similar cases and tracking mistakes. Additionally, the software delivers prompt reports on the preferences of multiple reviewers in varying locations. However, a drawback of VIDe is the potential lack of privacy when disclosing analysis information upon completing case studies.
After using VIDe software, I understood that it promotes open learning and sharing of diverse thoughts with no correct or incorrect answers. Though there were several options available, I felt confused and misunderstood some questions. It would have been beneficial to have a "pop-up" box for clarification. I believe that in the field of psychology, VIDe software is an exceptional tool for my future practice.
The software program is highly recommended for health providers and non-health organizations because
it has great value. With the advancement of technology and user knowledge, this software will become more useful. Its use in clinical practice can greatly enhance patient care in various settings. It is crucial to always remember that humans have inherent ethics.
On a daily basis, we encounter various ethical dilemmas that are mostly insignificant in practical terms. Dunn (1999) established that the underlying principle of the natural moral law is to pursue good and avoid evil. Nevertheless, defining "good" can be subjective and raises concerns about traditional ethical frameworks as well as newer software such as VIDe. Both methods play an important role in guiding ethical decision-making for individuals and society. However, I believe ethics encompasses several distinct approaches with their own set of inquiries, resulting in diverse outcomes.
The subject at hand is multifaceted, varied, debatable, and crucial.
- Incentive essays
- Values of Life essays
- Ethical dilemma essays
- Normative Ethics essays
- Virtue Ethics essays
- Belief essays
- Deontology essays
- Moral essays
- Virtue essays
- Work Ethic essays
- Accident essays
- Awareness essays
- Benefits of Volunteering essays
- Challenges essays
- Childhood Memories essays
- Decision essays
- Driving essays
- Event essays
- Excellence essays
- Expectations essays
- Failure essays
- Farewell essays
- Flight essays
- Gift essays
- Growing Up essays
- Ignorance essays
- Improve essays
- Incident essays
- Knowledge essays
- Luck essays
- Memories essays
- Mistake essays
- Obstacles essays
- Overcoming Challenges essays
- Party essays
- Peace Corps essays
- Personal Experience essays
- Problems essays
- Sacrifices essays
- Struggle essays
- Success essays
- Trust essays
- Vacation essays
- Visit essays
- Volunteering essays
- Board Of Directors essays
- Brand Management essays
- Business Ethics essays
- Business Management essays
- Change Management essays