Constructivism and the Syrian Civil War
Constructivism and the Syrian Civil War

Constructivism and the Syrian Civil War

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 3 (1204 words)
  • Published: October 18, 2017
  • Type: Paper
Text preview

Constructivism is a normative international dealingss theory that seeks to understand the importance of society’s actions and generalize its significance ( Adler. 1997. pp. 319-320 ) . Harmonizing to constructivism. any histrion can hold xan bureau in international dealingss such as provinces. establishments and persons and is dissimilar to realism and liberalism where alternatively of the premise that provinces are self-interested and rational. it accepts that these actor’s involvements and reason are socially constructed and are constituent of and by its individuality ( Bozdaglioglu. 2007. pp. 122-123 ) . The formation of the state’s involvements is inborn in its individuality. whereas pragmatism shapes them for endurance of the province. and liberalism provinces they are derived from cooperation and mutuality. Interests are non unconditioned or intrinsic ( Risse-Kappen. 1995. p. 502 ) .

As it is socially ‘constructed’ . a province can so be deconstructed and changed when all involvements. individualities and premises have been recognised. These involvements. such as jurisprudence. regulations. norms and establishments are ingrained in the system of international dealingss and are cardinal for instating alteration. Constructivism is the best theory for understanding the events in Syria because it shows how societal individualities and an actors’ involvements and penchants are socially constructed and can incite struggle. Due to the multiple groups motivated in this struggle multiple societal individualities are present which are incompatible. Ultimately. the Syrian Civil War is an individuality struggle with each individuality dwelling of their ain beliefs that each discovery sole. As individualiti


es and involvements are constituent. the involvements of a group service as a propellent for societal action ( Bozdaglioglu. 2007. pp. 131-132 ) . Therefore these constructed involvements motivate the societal individualities of the groups and need to be redefined in order for trust to be established. A societal individuality can be defined as a socially constructed set of significances that one attributes to oneself ( Bozdaglioglu. 2007. p. 132 ) . It is created predominately through the political picks and the actor’s interactions. premises. reading and corporate significances and serves a nucleus function in the Syrian struggle ( Adler. 1997. p. 324 ) .

The presence of multiple different societal individualities with legion beliefs in the Syrian struggle is incompatible and consequence in social ‘friction’ . Al-Assad’s government does non stand for the general populace. in the sense that it favours the Shia minority and suppresses all other individualities ( Vallely. 2014 ) . This is a struggle of cultural individuality where all groups hold different involvements in which each discovery sole. Constructivism is the lone theory in which acknowledges this individuality crisis between the parties involved in the Syrian civil war. Trust and peace need to be fortified and in order to make so a common individuality demands to be worked towards and founded by all sensible parties. As President Barack Obama provinces in relation to Syria: “Peace can be achieved by leting opposing parties to freely show and discourse their several sentiments which would ideally ensue in peaceable declarations based on positions held in common by these parties” ( Obama. 2013 ) To make so. the construction of norms in which develops

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

behavior and involvements must be deconstructed and changed ( Checkel. 1998. p. 328 ) .

An actor’s behavior is complex to understand as individualities are non fixed and known. and therefore it can non be deduced from the character that is assumed a province represents ( Palan. 2004. p. 14 ) . Looking through a constructivist lens. norms are corporate apprehensions that motivate histrions and hence consequence the individuality and involvement ( Checkel. 1998. pp. 327-328 ) . A dominant struggle in which sparked and fuels the Syrian civil war is that of the sectarian tenseness between the Sunni and Shia subdivisions of Islam ( Hinnebusch. 2008. pp. 263-265 ) . Deeply embedded in the Syrian civil war is that of a spiritual tumult between religious orders ( Vallely. 2014 ) . The rebellion in Syria consists of sectarian spiritual overtones in which resulted in a domestic clang between Shia and Sunni religious orders. With a authorities predominately Shia and 75 % of the population Sunni ( United States Central Intelligence Agency. 2014 ) a domestic clang between Shia authorities and Sunni population must be resolved in order for a common individuality of the province to be formed and trust established.

The al-Assad regime’s Shia representation clangs with the general Sunni populace and in order for this battle to be resolved. an impartial and independent authorities individuality must be formed. Constructivism is the lone theory in which recognises these dealingss and its important function in the civil war. It shows how the Sunni-Shia dealingss are an of import sector of the societal construction of Syria in which the actions of histrions with certain individualities and involvements are possible ( Wendt. 1995 ) . Constructivism distinguishes two nucleus premises of pragmatism and liberalism in which allow for a more advanced apprehension of the societal construction of Syria. First. that establishments and structures merely suppress behavior of provinces with fixed involvements and secondly. that the individuality of a province is perceived merely through physical capablenesss ( Checkel. 1998 ) . Relaxing these premises allows societal constructions to go of import and allows the formation of individualities and involvements to be defined by more than merely behavioral restraints ( Checkel. 1998 ) .

This is exemplified by the function spiritual establishments have in the Syria. As the Shia minority came into power. the protests become stronger and the presentations from the Sunni population are seen by the al-Assad government as terroristic. This lead to a redefining of the parties’ individualities. once and for all taking to each side placing the other as terrorists or condemnable packs. The individuality and involvements of the province are hence constituent of and by the other parties and non merely through physical capablenesss. Social constructions such as norms and civilization. have a profound consequence on agents. being characteristic of each parties’ individualities and therefore involvements ( Checkel. 1998 ) .

In decision. constructivism is the best theory to explicate what is go oning in Syria. By analyzing the cardinal determiners of province behavior. individuality and involvements. the current dissatisfaction of the position quo can be deconstructed and changed to organize one common

individuality. Merely societal interaction and meaningful duologue can steer the agents in placing involvements that is shared by the general populace. Merely when one common individuality is defined. will swear and peace. every bit good as domestic. societal and legal norms be established.


Adler. E. ( 1997 ) . Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of Internation Relations. 3 ( 3 ) . 319 – 363. Bozdaglioglu. Y. ( 2007 ) . Constructivism and Identity Formation: An Synergistic Approach. Uluslararasi Hukuk ve Politika. 3 ( 11 ) . 121-144. Checkel. J. T. ( 1998 ) . The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics. 50. 324-348. Hinnebusch. R. ( 2008 ) . Modern Syria Politics. History Compass. 6 ( 1 ) . 263-285. Obama. B. ( 2013 ) . U. N General Assembly Speech. United Nations. New York: United Nations General Assembly. Palan. R. ( 2004 ) . Constructivism and Globalization: From Unit of measurements to Brushs in International Affairs. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 17 ( 1 ) . 11-23. Risse-Kappen. T. ( 1995 ) . Democratic Peace – Warlike Democracies? Angstrom
Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument. Eurpoean Journal of International Relations. 1 ( 4 ) . 491-517. United States Central Intelligence Agency. ( 2014. April 2 ) . The World Factbook: Syria. Retrieved from Central Intelligence Agency: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. Central Intelligence Agency. gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sy. hypertext markup language Vallely. P. ( 2014. February 19 ) . The barbarous split between Sunni and Shia has been poisoning Islam for 1. 400 old ages – and it’s acquiring worse. The Independent. Wendt. A. ( 1992 ) . Anarchy is what provinces make of it: the societal building of power political relations. International Organisation. 46 ( 2 ) . 391-425. Wendt. A. ( 1995 ) . Constructing International Politics. International Security. 20 ( 1 ) . 71-81.