Closing the Baldwin Hospital Essay Example

government lacked sufficient justification and evidence to justify closing down Baldwin Hospital. The media played an essential role in garnering community support, casting the government in a negative light, and ultimately keeping Baldwin Hospital operational. In addition to media influence, the unification of the community, interest groups, and hospital staff played a significant role in preserving the hospital. In a time of crisis, these groups united to sway the media, accumulate a petition with 85000 signatures, and pressure the government to pursue alternate measures.

In modern times, the endangerment of the welfare of society as a whole often leads to unity among communities, especially minorities. This draws attention to the situation and can result in increased resources for resistance against governmental actions. In many cases, it also forces governments to abandon their original plans or seek alternative solutions. Interestingly, Baldwin Hospital did not receive public support from other hospitals or the Huronia Hospital Association. This highlights how politics can either strengthen or weaken professional relationships.

The main idea conveyed is that colleagues may refuse to help each other when doing so could jeopardize their relationship with the government. The individuals in control of the situation are lawyers and executives at the hospital who hold significant power over the outcome. Despite media and community support, decisions were ultimately made by these key players. A notable aspect of this case is that the Health Minister claimed compliance with the law, and without legal counsel, hospital executives would have been unaware of any illegal actions taken by the government.

It is unclear whether the government acted with intentional unfairness, although they have breached ethical boundaries and deceived the public to

achieve their goals. Despite a court order instructing otherwise, both the Health Minister and acting Health Minister defended their actions, indicating politicians' unwillingness to admit fault when faced with contradictory evidence.

The choice to maintain the Baldwin Hospital open was impacted by a range of actors, such as the media, community, interest groups and authoritative figures. This case underscores how the government often neglects social costs when making decisions. Yet, it is difficult for the government to account for these costs while also addressing competing demands from citizens and individual communities. In essence, this case demonstrates how even the government can be overcome and proven wrong - much like in the story of David and Goliath.