Free Hamlet Essays: Not Murder, Self Defense
Free Hamlet Essays: Not Murder, Self Defense

Free Hamlet Essays: Not Murder, Self Defense

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 4 (861 words)
  • Published: January 7, 2019
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

While Prince Hamlet is often held responsible for the downfall of the Royal family of Denmark, he cannot be solely held accountable. The driving force behind his actions was his intense desire to avenge his father's murder, which tragically led to the deaths of Gertrude, Polonius, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, and Ophelia. This raises an intriguing question: can someone be fully responsible for a murder if they are unaware of their victims' identities? In the case of Hamlet, he had made a promise to his father to seek justice on his behalf. Consequently, after watching a play, Hamlet received an urgent summons from his mother and went to speak with her in Gertrude's chamber.

During the play that evening, Hamlet's performance was not up to par, causing embarrassment for King Claudius. Hamlet subtly hinted that Claudius had a hand in his father's death. At th

...

is point in the play, Hamlet was aware that he was being closely watched by almost everyone. Therefore, when he heard a noise coming from behind a curtain, he had reason to be suspicious. Unaware that it was Polonius hiding there, Hamlet mistakenly believed it was Claudius preparing to attack him with a knife. In an act of self-defense, Hamlet tragically and unintentionally killed Polonius.

Polonius was mistakenly identified as the King, purely due to being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Consequently, Hamlet, who was unaware of this mistaken identity, cannot be held entirely accountable for Polonius's demise. Upon realizing his error, Hamlet expressed remorse for his actions towards Polonius and somewhat apologized, stating, "thou wretched, rash, intruding fool, farewell. I mistook you for someone of higher rank."

"Take thy fortune. Thou find's

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

to be too busy in some danger." ( Act 3 scene 4, line 38) Every person has their own distinct approach to confronting death: Hamlet grieves and seeks retribution, Gertrude moves on by marrying another spouse as a substitute for the previous one, and upon discovering her father's passing, Ophelia spirals into insanity.

Ophelia's response to death is to spiral into madness and exhibit erratic behavior. In the end, she becomes disconnected from reality and tragically decides to take her own life as a means of escaping the agony and torment. Ultimately, it is the passing of Ophelia's father that ultimately drives her untimely demise.

While Hamlet cannot be entirely blamed for Polonius' death, he should not be held accountable for Ophelia's demise. Hamlet truly loved Ophelia and would never purposefully harm her. As he stated, "I loved Ophelia. Forty thousand brothers could not equal the love I had for her. What will you do for her?" (Act 5 scene 1, line 282). Ultimately, it was Ophelia's decision to drown herself and put an end to her life.

Ophelia's dangerous way of dealing with death is not Hamlet's fault. Some people wrongly accuse Hamlet of killing Gertrude, but this is not true.

Claudius, intending to kill Hamlet, dropped a poisoned pill in the cup. However, his plan went awry and instead Gertrude, to Hamlet's triumph, lifted the glass to drink and was killed.

Despite Claudius's strong warning to Gertrude not to drink, she disregards his advice and consumes the beverage anyway. While some argue that Gertrude deliberately took her own life by knowingly ingesting the poisoned cup, there is no discernible motive for such an action. It would have

been inconceivable for her to suspect that her husband would go as far as poisoning his own stepson and nephew. Gertrude fully trusted in the safety of the cup due to her unwavering belief in her spouse's loyalty, a sentiment shared by any devoted wife. Alternatively, Claudius had the opportunity to swiftly approach and retrieve the cup from her.

Instead of intervening, he silently witnessed her demise. His fear of being labeled a traitor in front of his kingdom prevented him from acting. The humiliation of being mortified outweighed the pain of losing his beloved. Hence, Gertrude's death can be attributed to Claudius, and Hamlet had no involvement in it. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were supposed to be Hamlet's "friends."

Friends should monitor each other. Hamlet showed great kindness to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. "My excellent good friends! How are you, Guildenstern? Ah, Rosencrantz! Good lads, how are both of you?" (Act 2 scene 2, line 242) Hamlet believed his friends would support him. However, they ended up supporting his mother and his sinister uncle. Throughout the play, Hamlet's supposed "friends" turned against him and sided more with his parents.

Friends always choose you over your enemy. Therefore, Rosencrantz and Guldenstern were not genuine friends of Hamlet; they were only pretending for their personal gain. They were "sucking up" to the queen and king and driven by greed. Claudius provided them with a letter to deliver to the King of England, instructing him to eliminate Hamlet. Despite their ignorance of the letter's contents, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern would have unquestionably followed through with the King's scheme.

Having been previously killed, there was no reason to stop now. Hamlet had to have them

killed in order to protect himself as he was unaware of their next move.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New