Thought VS Action Essay Example

to jostle the k ins and allude to he fact that Hamlet knows of the murder. Unfortunately while the king notice s this addition, it does not have the overwhelming effect Hamlet hoped it would have had on the e king. This really highlights Hamlet's thought process and his sometime inability to commence action.

In Hamlet the king, Claudia is a man of action compared to Hamlet who is a man of thought. Both characters go about their own ways when trying to tackle a pro blew.

In the second act the king tries to find the true cause of hamlet's madness. Polonium propos sees that they hide behind a tapestry with both Hamlet and Aphelia present. He believes that if t hey are hidden Hamlet will talk about his love of Aphelia and Claudia will know the source of Hamlets madness. The king is a very direct and physical person.

When Polonium pitched s his idea, the king decides to immediately put it in action. Instead of "delegating" and having so neon else do the spying, he decides to go with Polonium and see the plan for himself.

If the plan was reversed and it was Hamlet doing the spying on the king it would certainly be a friend or true Steed acquaintance of his doing the actual work, instead of him. This can be shown again when CIA audios killed Hamlet Sir.

Instead of having someone else kill the king so he could step into p rower, he did it himself. He was the one that poured the poison into the ear of the king, not s money else. Evans The Shakespearean play

Hamlet is the best example of action vs.. Thought, an d the interaction Of the two.

Hamlet is the prime example Of putting too much thou get into something.

He is plagued by a lack of an ability to make a decision. This can be seen in act 4 scene 7 when Hamlet is contemplating murdering Claudia. He tries to understand what is j just and what is unjust. He believes that murdering Claudia will only be acceptable under cert.

in circumstances and therefore cannot kill him in the church. He believed that killing Claudia n the church would portray him to be an innocent king that was wrongly slain by a "mad" H armlet.

He also believed that Claudia would go to heaven because he was praying in the chug rich. Another example of Hamlet's constant state of indecision can be seen again when talk s himself out of suicide.

This scene houses one the most well known Shakespearean soliloquies s, "to be, or not to be". This comes as he is considering if it is better for him to just end his life or tolerate all of the injustices and wrongs of his and life and the others around him. In the end h e considers suicide to be "self slaughter" and decides against it.

The other main character we see I n Hamlet is Claudia.

Unlike Hamlet he is a man of action who prefers a swift and forceful response to a problem instead of a philosophical or theoretical one. If not for the interaction n of the two personalities the plot would never have a chance to advance. If it was

not fort he men of action counterbalancing the men Of thought no events WOOL_SLD happen in the play. All that would likely happen in Hamlet is Hamlet thinking and theorizing how he could avenge his ethers death.

He would be fully aware of the what needed to happen in order to prove Claudia s' guilt but would not have the physical "might" to do anything about it. On the other hand, there e is Claudia the man of action. If the entire play consisted of characters similar to the king the plot would never be able to advance. All that would happen is one character killing the other.

T he death of Evans Polonium is a perfect example of this imbalance. In the case of his death there was too much action and not enough thought. His death was the only rash decision made by Hamlet throughout he play. Oh, I am slain. (Act 3 Scene AY' Even though he fully believed that CLC audios was behind the tapestry he stabbed, he appeared to have acted very impulsively. This illustrates how some impulsively is needed in order for Hamlet to make any changes.

On a gar eater level this helps show how the interaction of thought and action is required in the play Hamlet. In the Shakespearean play Hamlet as well as many of his other works it can b e seen that Shakespeare preferred not men of action, nor men of thought, but the interact Zion of the two. The two main characters both have opposite mindsets.

Hamlet the protagonist is a man of thought and knowledge. The antagonist Claudia is a man of

force and action.

The play ARQ rises both thought and action to work in harmony in order for the plot to advance. If the men of action did not exist the play would revolve around hamlet aimlessly wondering how he can avenge e his fathers death. If not for men of thought all that would happen is "useless" action. This would encompass the unneeded killing of Polonium, This play revolves around a series of checks and balances between the two, and these are what make Shakespeare plays like Hamlet an everlasting Eng classic.