Theater of Absurd in Ubu the King by Alfred Jarry
Theater of Absurd in Ubu the King by Alfred Jarry

Theater of Absurd in Ubu the King by Alfred Jarry

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 6 (2667 words)
  • Published: October 6, 2017
Text preview

Social Turbulences and Absurdity: The Formation of the Theater of Absurd inUbu the Kingby Alfred Jarry

Abstraction

Alfred Jarry’s groundbreaking drama,Ubu the King,has been a beginning of inspiration for motions such as Dadaism, Surrealism, and the Theater of the Absurd for comparatively a long clip. The thematic and formal building of this drama owes much to the dogmas of the Theater of the Absurd. This paper follows two major stairss. It foremost attempts to demo the hints of Shakespeare inUbu the King, and discourse Jarry’s likely purposes of associating this drama to those of Shakespeare. It so goes on to enlarge the aspects of absurdness in the drama. This paper aims at exemplifying the absurd elements in the drama foremost by pulling some illustrations from the text, and secondly by lucubrating on the societal reaction toward the production ofUbu the King.

Introduction

Alfred Jarry, a dramatist and novelist, was born in France in 1873. He is largely recognized as the Godhead ofUbu Roitranslated asUbu the King( 1896 ) ; however Jarry has signed his name under the influential novels as good. One of the most complicated and studied novels published posthumously isFeats and Opinions of Dr. Faustroll, Pataphysician( 1911 ) in which Jarry develops on his thought of pataphysics. Jarry as “the most extraordinary and bizarre figures among pokes maudites of Gallic literature” ( Esslin 189 ) is mostly referred and revered as the Godhead ofUbu the King. This drama as the extension of the marionette dramaLes Poloneiscollabora

...

tively created by his two friends Henri and Charles Morin at some point in schooltimes at Lycee Rennes is subsequently followed by two other dramas by Jarry,Ubu Cuckolded( 1897 ) andUbu in Chains( 1899 ) . The sole manner in personal life and the iconoclastic attack to linguistic communication and theatrical conventions set out inUbu the Kingunderscore Alfred Jarry and his drama as one of the major precursors of the Dadaism, Surrealism and the Theater of the Absurd. The inquiry this paper attempts to reply is that why this drama is considered as the precursor of the Theater of the Absurd, and whether it is so-considered for the content and its subjects or it was the societal reaction and the iconoclastic nature of its production that made it be brought in different anthologies of Theater of the Absurd or the motions such as Dadaism or Surrealism.

To lucubrate on the issues put frontward, taking a deep expression atUbu the Kingthematically and structurally would pave the manner. Papa Ubu as the cardinal character of this drama is an officer to Wencelas, male monarch of Poland. As a fat, grotesque, someway stupid character, Papa Ubu is tempted into killing the male monarch by his married woman, Mama Ubu. Papa Ubu, Ironically in a banquet that is held for the publicity of him to a higher rank, kills the male monarch and his two boies while the youngest boy survives the conflict and fled to the mountains. After prehending the throne, he bit by bit destroys the evident societal order and peace and follows satisfying his ain satisfaction. Finally, Papa Ubu is defeated in a conflict by Czar Alexis and th

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay
View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

survived boy of the male monarch, Bougrelas, and runs off with his married woman.

Ubu and Shakespeare

Taking a brief expression at the secret plan ofUbu the King, the reader instantly recognizes its similarity to Shakespeare’s drama ( s ) . The first drama comes to mind isMacbethin which the two portion elements of secret plan. While Macbeth is tempted by Lady Macbeth into killing Duncan, in Jarry’s drama it is Ubu who is tempted into killing Wencelas by Mama Ubu. Carrey Mittenberg in his article “Proto-Absurdist Strides and Leanings: Alfred Jarry’s Shakespearean Spirit inUbu Roi” draws analogies between Jarry and Shakespeare and provides the readers with some similarities. The last scene ofUbu the Kingshows the flight of Papa Ubu and Mama Ubu in the storm which brings to mind the opening scene ofThe Tempest. It is besides similar to one of Shakespeare’s historical dramas,Richard III“Pere Ubu’s across-the-board tummy embodies the physically malformation of his hungriness for trespass non unlike Richard III’s premature misshape” ( Mittenberg 51 ) .The rubric besides suggests Jarry’s intended correspondence in hisUbu the King ;the order of the words and the focal point on the character as a male monarch is like some of the rubrics of Shakespeare such asKing Lear,Macbeth, andHenry VII. The other structural component is the division of the Acts of the Apostless and the scenes inUbu the male monarchthat makes it comparable to some of Shakespeare’s calamities.

Stating thatUbu the Kingis similar to Shakespeare’s dramas in non the chief focal point of Mittenberg’s survey ; what he aims at flowering is the fact thatUbu the Kingfor the audience of late 19Thursdaycentury does the same thing that Shakespeare did for the Gallic theatre departers of 16Thursdayand 17Thursdaycenturies. Bing stiff in characteristic and keeping inflexible worldviews toward society and tradition, people attended to watch production of Shakespeare’s dramas were far off accepting the topics dealt with in those calamities. The audience of 16Thursdayand 17Thursdaycenturies barely accepted Shakespeare since “the drama violated the already relaxed and expanded confines of Gallic gustatory sensation ( gout ) .” ( Mittenberg 6 ) Mittenberg asserts thatUbu the Kingdoes the really same thing to the gout of the late 19Thursdaycentury audience. Implicitly it would non be inappropriate to state that both Shakespeare and Jarry provide the universe of literature in France with being daring in content ( largely in instance of Shakespeare ) and signifier ( largely in instance of Jarry ) . To come to a clear point is to state that Jarry’s intervention of Shakespeare’s major dramas is a sort of witting reaction to the ethical motives and conventions of Gallic theatre. Jarry divest himself of the Frenchistic “gout” of the late 19Thursdaycentury and throws himself into a battleground of specifying a new gout for Gallic theatre and more significantly for world-wide literature.

[ C ] ritics furiously debatedUbu Roi’s worth and legitimacy to the Gallic phase, much like others had with Shakespeare 150 old ages before. And whileUbu Roiis both a mixture of Shakespearean figure of speechs and a reworked version of a collaboratively-written schoolboy travesty, the permeant non-serious temper, the historically inaccurate and implausible action, the off-color vocals

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay