The Relationship between Science and Technology
- Words: 2943
- Pages: 11
Get Full Essay
Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.Get Access
- The word scientific discipline comes from the Latin “ scientia, ” intending cognition.
- Science – a brief overview
- Technology – a brief overview
- How do they associate?
- The Relationship Between Science and Technology
- Technology and the Environment
- The converse impact of engineering on scientific discipline is of at least equal importance:
- Deductions for Education in New Zealand
The word scientific discipline comes from the Latin “ scientia, ” intending cognition.
How do we specify scientific discipline? Harmonizing to Webster ‘s New Collegiate Dictionary, the definition of scientific discipline is “ cognition attained through survey or pattern, ” or “ cognition covering general truths of the operation of general Torahs, esp. as obtained and tested through scientific method [ and ] concerned with the physical universe. ”
What does that truly intend? Science refers to a system of geting cognition. This system uses observation and experimentation to depict and explicate natural phenomena. The term scientific discipline besides refers to the organized organic structure of cognition people have gained utilizing that system. Less officially, the word scientific discipline frequently describes any systematic field of survey or the cognition gained from it.
What is the intent of scientific discipline? Possibly the most general description is that the intent of scientific discipline is to bring forth utile theoretical accounts of world.
Most scientific probes use some signifier of theA scientific method. You can happen out more about the scientific methodA here.
Science as defined above is sometimes called pure scientific discipline to distinguish it from applied scientific discipline, which is the application of research to human demands. William claude dukenfields of scientific discipline are normally classified along two major lines: A
A A A – Natural scientific disciplines, the survey of the natural universe, andA
A A A – Social scientific disciplines, the systematic survey of human behaviour and society.
Due to the nature of modern-day society, the relationship between the spheres of scientific discipline and engineering has ne’er been stronger. Science and engineering have different intents, ways of screening and cognizing the universe, and therefore their relationship is frequently tense and complex. However, they serve to inform and widen each other in both intended and unexpected ways. Student larning in scientific discipline and engineering can be enhanced through their common survey. By understanding the differences and relationship between these two spheres, pupils in educational scenes will derive an grasp of the nature of each at a more philosophical degree. This is of import to the development of a both scientific and technological literacy that will let for informed citizenship.
TechnologyA is the use and cognition ofA tools, techniques, A trades, A systemsA or methods of organisation in order to work out a job or make an artistic position. The wordA technologycomes from theA GreekA technologiaA ( I„IµI‡I?I?I»I?I?I?I± ) -A technA“A ( I„II‡I?I· ) , an “ art ” , “ accomplishment ” or “ trade ” andA -logiaA ( -I»I?I?I?I± ) , the survey of something, or the subdivision of cognition of a subject. [ 1 ] A The term can either be applied by and large or to specific countries: illustrations includeA building engineering, medical engineering, A information engineering, orA high engineering.
Technologies significantly affect human every bit good as other carnal species ‘ ability to command and accommodate to their natural environments. The human species ‘ usage of engineering began with the transition of natural resources into simple tools. TheA prehistoricalA find of the ability to controlA fireA increased the available beginnings of nutrient and the innovation of theA wheelA helped worlds in going in and commanding their environment. Recent technological developments, including theA printing imperativeness, theA telephone, and theA Internet, have lessened physical barriers tocommunicationA and allowed worlds to interact freely on a planetary graduated table. However, non all engineering has been used for peaceable intents ; the development ofA weaponsA of ever-increasing destructive power has progressed throughout history, fromA clubsA toA atomic arms.
Technology has affectedA societyA and its milieus in a figure of ways. In many societies, engineering has helped develop more advancedA economiesA ( including today’sA planetary economic system ) and has allowed the rise of aA leisureA category. Many technological procedures produce unwanted byproducts, known asA pollution, and deplete natural resources, to the hurt of theEarthA and itsA environment. Assorted executions of engineering influence theA valuesA of a society and new engineering frequently raises new ethical inquiries. Examples include the rise of the impression ofA efficiencyA in footings of human productiveness, a term originally applied merely to machines, and the challenge of traditional norms.
Philosophic arguments have arisen over the present and future usage of engineering in society, with dissensions over whether engineering improves theA human conditionA or worsens it.A Neo-Luddism, A anarcho-primitivism, and similar motions knock the pervasiveness of engineering in the modern universe, speak uping that it harms the environment and alienates people ; advocates of political orientations such astranshumanismA andA techno-progressivismA position continued technological advancement as good to society and the human status. Indeed, until late, it was believed that the development of engineering was restricted merely to human existences, but recent scientific surveies indicate that otherA primatesA and certainA dolphinA communities have developed simple tools and learned to go through their cognition to other coevalss.
Due to the nature of modern-day society, the relationship between the spheres of scientific discipline and engineering has ne’er been stronger. Both spheres are recognised as cardinal signifiers of human activity, and stand alongside the humanistic disciplines and societal scientific disciplines as cardinal to human accomplishment and look. Essential to recognizing the strength of the relationship between scientific discipline and engineering, is the recognition that neither holds a subservient place. Rather, scientific discipline and engineering work together for the common benefit and/or growing of each sphere in both intended and unexpected ways.
In order to understand the complexness of the relationship between scientific discipline and engineering, it is first of import to set up how the two spheres differ, peculiarly given it is these differences that provide the strength of their current confederation. The distinction between scientific discipline and engineering can be characterised by three cardinal factors:
the sphere ‘s nucleus concern ( its intent ) ;
its position of what ‘exists ‘ in the universe ( its ontological stance ) ; and
how it defines and validates knowledge ( its epistemology ) .
The following provides an overview of how these factors are articulated within current apprehensions of scientific discipline and engineering.
Science – a brief overview
The overruling intent of scientific discipline is to explicate the natural universe through iterative rational and fact-finding patterns that involve observations and controlled uses of that universe. In support of this, scientific discipline can be most comfortably argued today in footings of a ‘critical realist ‘ stance. This reflects a position that ‘things ‘ exist in the universe and ‘are as they are ‘ ( Lopez and Potter, 2001 ) . As such, the function of scientists is to interrogate the ‘real things ‘ of the natural universe in order to build accounts of them. In maintaining with the position of scientific discipline as a human activity, ensuing explanatory texts are embedded in the sociocultural universe and as such will be human-mediated representations of the ‘real things ‘ . Scientific cognition hence, is that which has ‘real things ‘ as its referent. For new cognition to be validated within the sphere of scientific discipline, this cognition must adhere to logical logical thinking and be internally consistent within the dominant paradigm. Alternatively, it must supply a substantiated challenge to the paradigm, while still runing within the tolerance degrees of the wider sphere. It must defy equal reappraisal in order to be represented as a ‘truth ‘ . Truth hence, is non viewed as an absolute within scientific discipline. Rather scientific ‘truths ‘ are, in maintaining with matter-of-fact theory, that cognition that additions the consensus of experts within the sphere. In contrast to traditional positions of the being of a scientific method, modern-day positions of scientific methodological analysiss include an apprehension of their diverseness and flexibleness to run into the undertaking at manus. Therefore, look into methods employed both between, and frequently within, different subsets of scientific discipline can differ markedly.
Technology – a brief overview
The intent of engineering is to step in in the universe to bring forth something ‘other ‘ to that which presently exists. It achieves this through iterative rational and design-based patterns that involve multiple beginnings of input. These input beginnings include a mixture of that defined as natural, stuff, simulated, conceptual, emotional, and imagined. Engineers besides draw from the yesteryear, current and a scope of possible and likely hereafters. The stance that has been argued as best back uping an apprehension of the sphere of engineering, is that of a’process ontology ‘ . This stance challenges the critical realist impression that ‘things ‘ exist as such, and alternatively argues that ‘processes ‘ are what exist, and it is our interaction in procedure which allows the chance to categorize, and therefore exteriorize, ‘things as such ‘ ( Neuman, 2003 ) . Therefore, from such a technological point of view, we are both Godheads of the material universe of engineering in clear and touchable ways, and besides symbolic Godheads of the ‘natural ‘ universe. Technological cognition does non try to do claims to ‘truth ‘ in the same manner as scientific cognition does. Alternatively it has as its referent, the procedure of map. What validates technological cognition therefore is ‘success ‘ non ‘truth ‘ . However, like scientific discipline, the ‘success ‘ of technological cognition is determined within technological pattern by experts within the sphere of engineering. Technological patterns are state of affairs specific, and hence are as diverse and varied as the contexts and people involved in the enterprise.
How do they associate?
Scientific cognition and methodological analysiss themselves provide a major beginning of input into the development of technological patterns and results. They are besides cardinal tools in the constitution of accounts of why technological intercessions were, or were non, successful. In short, scientific discipline can supply powerful accounts for the why and why non behind technological intercession. However, as these intercessions rely on more than an apprehension of the ‘natural ‘ universe, they can merely supply partial justification for technological patterns and results.
Technological patterns, cognition and results can supply mechanisms for scientific discipline to derive a better position of its defined universe, and in fact can supply serious challenges to the shaping of that universe. For illustration, the development of the technological artifacts that extend the observation capablenesss of worlds ( such as the telescope and microscope ) , made ‘visible ‘ and available ‘new universes ‘ for scientific discipline to interrogate and explicate.
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Science, engineering and invention each represent a in turn larger class of activities which are extremely mutualist but distinguishable. Science contributes to engineering in at least six ways:
( 1 ) new cognition which serves as a direct beginning of thoughts for new technological possibilities ;
( 2 ) beginning of tools and techniques for more efficient technology design and a cognition base for rating of feasibleness of designs ;
( 3 ) research instrumentality, research lab techniques and analytical methods used in research that finally find their manner into design or industrial patterns, frequently through intermediate subjects ;
( 4 ) pattern of research as a beginning for development and assimilation of new human accomplishments and capablenesss finally utile for engineering ;
( 5 ) creative activity of a cognition base that becomes progressively of import in the appraisal of engineering in footings of its wider societal and environmental impacts ;
( 6 ) cognition base that enables more efficient schemes of applied research, development, and polish of new engineerings.
Middle school pupils struggle with distinguishing between scientific discipline and engineering. “ Engineers, designers, and others who engage in design and technologyA usage scientific cognition to work out practical jobs. They besides normally have to take human values and restrictions into history. ”
This quotation mark comes from Benchmarks, a publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and an inspiration for theA National Science Education StandardsA ( NSES ) . TheA NSESHYPERLINK “ hypertext transfer protocol: //www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/nses/6d.html # st ” A Science and Technology standardA has two parts: abilities of technological design and apprehensions about scientific discipline and engineering. The undermentioned resources will assist pupils understand the relationship between scientific discipline and engineering and the differences between the two.
Technology and the Environment
In this publication, instructors will happen resources they can utilize when edifice or refreshing a unit about the environment. Unit of measurements about engineering and the environment provide first-class chances for instructors of engineering, scientific discipline, and mathematics to join forces. Students to measure the hazards and benefits of single and industrial utilizations of engineering.
The converse impact of engineering on scientific discipline is of at least equal importance:
( 1 ) through supplying a fertile beginning of fresh scientific inquiries and thereby besides assisting to warrant the allotment of resources needed to turn to these inquiries in an efficient and timely mode, widening the docket of scientific discipline ;
( 2 ) as a beginning of otherwise unavailable instrumentality and techniques needed to turn to fresh and more hard scientific inquiries more expeditiously.
Specific illustrations of each of these bipartisan interactions are discussed. Because of many indirect every bit good as direct connexions between scientific discipline and engineering, the research portfolio of possible societal benefit is much broader and more diverse than would be suggested by looking merely at the direct connexions between scientific discipline and engineering.
Science and engineering is the best thing society could of all time inquire for. Since the industrial revolution in the eighteenth century scientific discipline has been in advancement. Some sectors that have been boosted by scientific discipline and engineering are energy, physical scientific disciplines, information and communicating. The society has greatly gained with the innovation of engineering.
Infrastructure in the society has grown with the aid of scientific discipline and engineering. Modes of conveyance like electronic railroad lines were realized and these really benefited the society by offering them a better agencies of conveyance. In the yesteryear, about everything was analog but thanks to the scientific discipline and engineering we are now being digitalized by the twenty-four hours. The innovation of the telephone and wireless services has broadened human communicating.
Without society so there would be no scientific discipline and engineering and that is why the innovation of certain tools and equipment have helped accomplish large things. Society can non make without the industries we have today. The society needs scientific discipline and engineering. The creative activity of computing machines is work of art by persons was a milepost that would come a long manner in assisting the society. A computing machine helps us to leverage ourselves by deriving valuable information that we can utilize to enrich our lives. The impact of scientific discipline and engineering can earnestly be recognized. Many people around the universe return for illustration bookmans in colleges and universities have taken the lead analyzing the relationship between scientific discipline and engineering.
The rating of this relationship has emerged as an of import country of research. Public involvement groups and academic organisations throughout the universe are acknowledging the importance of STS. The ground is that people need to acknowledge that there are people who are affected by the scientific discipline and engineering. Controversies such as modified nutrients, root cell research are the issues that have brought policy shapers and scientists together to hold a manner frontward on this.
Science and engineering has really mostly contributed to the vision of adult male about himself. Science has been modified the sentiment about the beginning of adult male and topographic point of beginning excessively. Through the consequences of scientific finds the perceptual experience of adult male about his behaviour and his topographic point of beginning has been modified diversly. Experiments in scientific discipline today are in one manner or another impacting the society.Take for illustration the experiment on cloning a human being. The experiment brought a batch of contention since the society was disbelieving about it.
How is scientific discipline and engineering related to society: The developing universe has a long tradition of participatory action research, popular instruction and community organisation fall ining up to work out some scientific discipline and engineering issues that affect the society. How is scientific discipline and engineering related to the society is something that is naming even for the authorities intercession. Science and engineering related issues are really been discussed worldwide today. Advancement in this has resulted to the ability to bring forth diverse types of stuff points. Answering the inquiry how scientific discipline and engineering is related to society.
Deductions for Education in New Zealand
From the above, it can be seen that scientific discipline and engineering have a basically different intent, and different ways of screening and cognizing the universe. Just as scientific discipline and engineering work in reciprocally good ways in the wider contexts of scientific and technological enterprise, within the context of instruction, their relationship can be productively explored to heighten acquisition in both countries.
Scientific cognition and methodological analysiss are utile, and in many instances critical, to pupils successful project of technological pattern and in the development of technological cognition. Technological cognition, patterns and results in bend can supply utile, and once more in many instances critical, tools ( both conceptual and stuff ) for scientific pattern and the development of scientific cognition. Technological patterns and results can besides supply reliable contexts which enable pupils to develop deeper more meaningful apprehensions of scientific cognition and methodological analysiss.
However, possibly even more significantly, geographic expedition of the nature of both scientific discipline and engineering can supply fertile evidences for developing deeper apprehensions of both through reflecting on the differences between these cardinal countries of being ‘human ‘ . The meeting boundaries between that perceived as the made and the natural universe, the existent and simulated, the presently impossible and future likely, all demand pupils develop such relational cross sphere cognition, in combination with in-depth apprehensions within both scientific discipline and engineering. This in bend allows for the development of a critical frame indispensable to the development of scientific and technological literacy that supports pupils towards informed citizenship.