The Nature Of Sin Pelagius View Theology Religion Essay Essay

essay A+

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

In the early history the beginning of wickedness was one of the major issue, Pelagius and Augustine fought approximately in their apprehension about original wickedness. Many bookmans ‘ believed that wickedness did non impact human race when Adam and Eve were sin. Many believed was based on the Bible says that when Adam and Eve were sin in the Garden of Eden all human that Born after them were affected by their wickedness. The intent of this essay was to compare and contrast two outstanding people on their position in original wickedness. The essay will cover the undermentioned points. First, the essay will speak about the nature of wickedness. How do Pelagius and Augustine understand the nature of wickedness? Second, we will detect the how they understand the Freedom of the will. Third, how grace were understand by them. And eventually the essay will give some deduction in relation to these two bookmans. The essay will cover the above point through this point we will see their statements and the differences between them.

THE NATURE OF SIN

PELAGIUS VIEW.

Worlds are born sinless. Harmonizing to Pelagius position he portrait from his composing that when human being was born he was born sinless. This means that Adam wickedness does non impact his descendants. The wickedness that was committed by Adam and Eve was merely applied to them because of their ain pick. For that really Pelagius expression at every person that Born after Adam was free from wickedness. Harmonizing to our note from the category it stated that “ Pelagius position says that God created all human existences with their power to move now it depend on them to will and to prosecute in the action ”[ 1 ]here you can see the point Pelagius seeking to portrait is that all human being are created by God with the power to do their ain pick. For that ground wickedness Adam and Eve autumn into was non for all. Therefore he said that wickedness did non impact any descendant of Adam. For illustration “ for Pelagius the human power of ego betterment could non be thought of as being via media. It was ever possible for worlds to dispatch their duty towards God. ”[ 2 ]These carry the thought that adult male is born sinless until he or she make a pick to make evil ; so here we can see that Pelagius viewed on wickedness was that when we born to this Earth we born impeccant. Millard commented that harmonizing to Pelagius position “ there is no direct connexion between Adam ‘s wickedness and the remainder of the human race. ”[ 3 ]This is the chief thought Pelagius have in his head, wickedness have no room in human being when they born. Earle E Carns commented that Pelagius believed that each adult male is created free as Adam was and that adult male has the Power to take good and evil. The catholicity of wickedness in the universe is explained by the failing of human flesh instead than by corruptness of the homo will by original wickedness. ”[ 4 ]From the above information give s that fact that Pelagius position on original is that we non affected by wickedness.

AUGUSTINE VIEW

Sin affected all human races. Augustine from his personal experience he come up with a position that sin that was done by Adam and Eve our first parents affect all of us. Augustine based his position in Romans 5:12. “ hence, merely as the wickedness entered the universe through one adult male, and decease through wickedness and in this manner decease came to all people because all sinned ” this is the poetry that Augustine based his position to depend his statements with Pelagius position on wickedness. Harmonizing to Louis Berklof “ Augustine dosage non see wickedness as something positive but a negation or want ”[ 5 ]so here we see that Augustine position on wickedness was really different of what Pelagius viewed wickedness. Earle E Carns stated that Augustine position was that “ Man was original made in the image of God and free to take good and evil but Adam ‘s wickedness bounded all Men because Adam was the caput of the race. ”[ 6 ]For that really fact his position was that we are affected by wickedness through Adam.

Arguments

Looking at these two positions we will happen that there are many statements and argument about his two positions. As you can see in Pelagius position he argues the point that adult male was born sinless when they are born. He added that when human being is born they were born natural. Meaning to state Adam was non born to positive sanctity nevertheless he has the ability to execute that responsibility to make that sanctity. His chief statement here is that when we born to this Earth we born merely like Adam. Louis commented that Pelagius said that “ there is no familial transmittal of a iniquitous nature or of guilt and accordingly no such thing as original wickedness. ”[ 7 ]Here we find that Pelagius merely denied entire corruption of human nature. Millard and Arnold added that “ Pelagius maintain that the psyche, created by God particularly for every individual is non tainted by any supposed corruptness or guilt ”[ 8 ]. However Augustine argues to that point that if that ‘s the instance we non necessitate that grace. Grace will explicate more in ulterior treatment.

However Augustine argue to the point that human being affected by wickedness. From his experience he tried really difficult to make good for that ground we found he prayed to God for confession. Augustine “ he finds its root rule of wickedness in that ego love which is substituted for the love of God. ”[ 9 ]fro Augustine since that wickedness affect all human race the love that God sent his boy replace that broken relationship. That relationship was broken because of wickedness. To widen more on it Augustine expression at Pelagius that he rejected the importance of Christ decease. Christ decease is here because of wickedness. If we born impersonal similar Adam as Pelagius have said ; Christ is nonmeaningful to us. Augustine believes that we are descendants of Adam therefore we are sin. That connexion makes as evildoer. Pelagius denied the familial nevertheless Augustine here supported that we are sin through familial connexion. Harmonizing to E Glern Hinson he commented that Pelagius said that if Adam ‘s wickedness plants against those who do non transgress, Christ righteousness is efficacious for these who did non believe nevertheless Augustine responded the baby excessively, are the trusters and benefit from what parents and patrons do for them. ”[ 10 ]Pelagius keep his statements that wickedness did non impact any human being when they born, hence we see that Augustine continue to reason the point that we are affected by wickedness through this Adam.

Pelagius besides argue his point which Augustine did non hold with. He said the wickedness was done wilfully. Alister commented that Pelagius said that “ humanity is born sinless and wickedness merely through calculated actions. ”[ 11 ]Pelagius stand on the place that wickedness ne’er affects all human races. We are born like Adam before wickedness. When we did non following Gods jurisprudence and duty wickedness will come to us. Looking back at Augustine supplication we found out that Pelagius see that the supplication was “ inquiring for God encouragements and strength ; nevertheless Pelagius said we already plan by God to transport out his ain will why make we necessitate God. ”[ 12 ]Here we find that Pelagius keep his statements that we are born sinless.

The above points give us really clear image that these two people have different positions and they depend their position. To Augustine we are affected by wickedness through Adam for that ground what we did was reflecting iniquitous nature. On the other manus Pelagius said that wickedness was merely come to us when we make incorrect pick. We are born with a capacity of making right or incorrect. All these were given to us when we are born.

Freedom OF THE WILL.

PELAGIUS VIEW

We have born with freedom of will. Since that we are born sinless and impersonal we are holding freedom of will with us. To Pelagius this is how he sees our freedom of pick. Harmonizing to Collins encyclopedia Pelagius said that “ usage of our native powers entirely since nil but free will is necessitate to pattern virtuousness and maintain out from wickedness. ” From this beginning we can state that Pelagius construct on will was given to us when we born ; so Pelagius here uphold position that freedom of will was given to us to pick non be to transgress and transgress. In other words we did non necessitate any more power from God since all these things given to us.

AUGUSTINE VIEW

Our freedom of will was bias towards evil. Augustine position on freedom of will as making evil every clip. Based from his confession he struggle of making right on his ain power. This primary beginning helps us to see that Augustine positions freedom of will as destroyed when Adam our first parents sinned. This what he said from his confession “ I probed the concealed deepnesss of my psyche and contort its secrets from it and when I gathered them all before the eyes of my bosom, a great storm broke within me, conveying with a great flood of cryings aˆ¦for I felt that I was still enslaved by my wickednesss, and my in my wretchedness I kept shouting how long shall I travel on stating “ tomorrow, tomorrow ‘ ? Why non now? Why non do an terminal of my ugly wickednesss at this minute ” ?[ 13 ]This supplication helps us to see that wickedness destruct our freedom of will for that ground Augustine said this supplication. The possibility of making good in ain power can non go on because of wickedness.

Arguments

Both positions argue were argued by them. To Pelagius every homo are responsible on their ain wickedness. Since they born with sinless like Adam before wickedness they have that freedom to take. Alister commented that “ for Pelagius humanity possessed entire freedom of the will and was wholly responsible for its ain wickedness. ”[ 14 ]He argues to indicate that we are created and free human nature. These points help us to see that Pelagius did non accept that Augustine says about the freedom of the will. For him there is no demand to pray for God to be forgiven ; this full thing was already given to us when we are created. This lead Pelagius see that flawlessness can be attain through following the duty. Justification by plants highlighted here. However Augustine did non accept that position. Earle E Carns commented that Augustine stated that “ Mans will is wholly corrupted by the autumn so that he must be considered wholly perverse and unable to exert his ain will sing redemption. He believes that all inherit wickedness through Adam that no 1 therefore can get away original wickedness. ”[ 15 ]In fact that original wickedness destroys our freedom of will. The freedom is fundamentally to take immorality for that ground Augustine in his treatment we need God ‘s grace.

However Augustine sees Pelagius position as unorthodoxy because harmonizing to the bible all homo was sinned through Adam. Augustine experiences it that making do in our ain will was non possible. For Augustine our freedom of will was destroyed by wickedness. This how he argue his point “ there are two graduated table of pan when the graduated table was loaded both side depend on the weight of the burden ‘ if one side heavy the graduated table will still work nevertheless it will non equilibrate ”[ 16 ]this what wickedness and freedom of will make. That we did was prejudice towards making evil. We have the high inclination of making bad things because of wickedness. Therefore Augustine concluded that our freedom of will was entire distorted by wickedness.

HOW GRACE WERE UNDERSTAND BY THEM

PELAGIUS VIEW

Grace was non truly of import. Pelagius position on grace was that since that human being is born sinless and has freedom of the will decorate is non needed. The grace already been with us when we born he added. Our talk note said that Pelagius position was that “ grace is God ‘s work to help the capacity to be able to the good. But this was non all. In this grace, God besides provide people with free will, including non to transgress. ”[ 17 ]for Pelagius grace is something already within us that is why we able to take good, nevertheless Pelagius said that this non all grace is really small portion in human life. Grace was already inputted in us, we have to execute it to that criterion in order to be saved. This position leads to indicate that we are justified by plants. Millard and Arnold commented that “ A redemption by plants is therefore rather possible although that is something of a misnomer since we are non truly iniquitous guilt and disapprobation. ”[ 18 ]This is what Pelagius heading towards and believes on it.

AUGUSTINE VIEW

We need God ‘s grace. To Augustine Grace is really of import in our lives. Since that wickedness impact our lives there ‘s no any other agencies to be saved but through Gods grace. He builds his position from his old point. For illustration he view wickedness as affected all of us and our freedom of the will was affected to reconstruct all these we need God ‘s grace. Basically this what Augustine positions on wickedness? Augustine chief Text was John 15:5 ” apart from me you can make nil, we are wholly depended upon God for our Redemption from being the terminal of our lives ” he added that human nature requires transmutation through the grace of God.[ 19 ]. To Augustine Grace of God is really critical for every single individual on this Earth. Without the grace of God we will lost.

Arguments

Their statement here was really clear ; Pelagius denied the grace of God as of import while Augustine supported that fact that we need grace of God. Let ‘s expression to Pelagius statement on Grace of God. Pelagius argued that if we depended on God ‘ grace what will be the work of the commandments. He insisted that Grace is external ; it was provided by God through his enlightenment. For illustration “ Ten commandments and the moral illustration of Jesus Christ grace informs us what our moral responsibilities are ”[ 20 ]her we can see that for Pelagius grace was at that place to informs us about our moral responsibilities which to follow the 10 commandments and unrecorded sinless. Therefore Pelagius added that “ we are unable to avoid wickedness through instruction and illustration of Jesus Christ ”[ 21 ].

On the other manus Augustine argues that Grace was needed. Grace was the godly aid to humanity, instead than merely moral ushers. Augustine sees that grace was existent non an external like Pelagius said, grace was existent because God demonstrated that in the cross. In creative activity we are born perfect nevertheless when affected Adam wickedness and Eve we are all affected and the lone manner to salvage was grace Augustine argued. Grace rescue us from that wickedness hence grace is something internal instead than external. So here we see that both positions have their points. To Augustine we see that God ‘s grace is of import because we are sinned. But Pelagius he insisted that grace is already their when we born, it helps us to follow our spiritual responsibilities. Lohse P fortress remark that “ Pelagius regarded the righteousness of Gods as demanding and judgment righteousness ”[ 22 ]this is really true because in his statement we see that he point was heading towards righteousness by Works. On the other manus we see Augustine see that we can merely make good things through grace. Since that wickedness was pride Augustine maintain the point accepting God grace is through unimportance of the Black Marias.

Some deduction.

Reading through these two viewing audiences you will happen many deduction if you decide to following one of learning. Let ‘s expression to Pelagius what are some possible deduction we can larn from his position. The first deduction that we can larn from his instruction is that disregarding that fact that we are evildoers. If we following his instruction we are heading toward s that pointy that we are continuing what he teach. Ignoring our iniquitous nature was one of the major deductions can hold here in Pelagius position? For that Reason we have to see that deduction about his instruction.

In add-on to that we can besides take to the phase that we did non necessitate Jesus any more ; due to the point that we are impeccant. Depending on God will be besides one Major deduction. Because lone evildoer demands Christ, hence if we following his instruction we are heading towards his believes.

Further more on that we non merely follow the above point but we besides reject the redemption message. The grace was wholly rejected here. For him grace was something that already within us when we are born. Because of this he strongly argues to that point that we do non necessitate grace. This type of rational thought is really high we follow his instruction. So the deduction from Pelagius position is that we will deny the whole intent of redemption planned. Because program of redemption was given to us because we are sinner.

On the other manus Augustine positions have its deduction as good. Looking to his position the deduction we can larn is that we acknowledge the fact that we are evildoers. For Augustine this most of import thing to acknowledge as human being. We have to cognize that we are sinner does non hold any ability to make right. This is the major deduction here.

To widen on that because we are sinner the grace of God was to the full needed. This grace is the lone manner to assist us in our lives. So here we see that Augustine deduction is that we are nil unless we come to God. Jesus is the beginning of everything, that ‘s what Augustine seeking to state here in his instruction. Therefore we follow his instruction most likely we have to admit the fact that we are sinner and we need Christ to direct us and to make right pick in life. So for Augustine wickedness affects all human races improbable Pelagius denied that we are evildoers.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member
unlock