A nurse notes that the health care unit keeps a listing of the patient names at the front desk in easy view for health care providers to more efficiently locate the patient. The nurse talks with the nursing manager because this action is a violoation of which act? [23] 1. Mental Health Parity Act 2. Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) 3. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) 4. Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act

3 More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/nursing-fundamentals-exam-1-practice-test/

3 The privacy rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requires patient information to be protected from unnecessary publication. The Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA) addresses the needs of the mental health patient, the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) addresses a patient’s right to refuse treatment and formulate advance directives, and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) ensures appropriate screening and stabilization of the patient in an emergency setting.

The nurse notes that the healthcare unit keeps a listing of the patient names at the front desk in easy view for healthcare providers to more efficiently locate the patient. Which does this action violate? 1 Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA) 2 Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) 3 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) 4 Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/foundations-of-nursing-chapter-23-legal-implications-in-nursing-practice/

Home Page Arts And Humanities Philosophy Applied Philosophy Mental Health Parity Act

Mental Health Parity Act Flashcards, test questions and answers

Q: The Mental Health Parity Act of 1996

A statute that forbids health plans from placing lifetime or annual limits on mental health coverage that are less generous than those placed on medical or surgical benefits. Excluded substance abuse. If a plan does cover mental health, it cannot set a separate dollar limit from medical care. Other limits allowed: limited number of annual outpatient visits; Limited number of annual inpatient days; a per visit fee; Higher deductibles and copayments without parity in medical and surgical benefits. If a parity would require an increase of 1% or more in its health care costs, the plan would be exempt. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/ccm-case-management-study-guide-chapter-6-healthcare-reimbursement/

Discover flashcards, test exam answers, and assignments to help you learn more about Mental Health Parity Act and other subjects. Don’t miss the chance to use them for more effective college education. Use our database of questions and answers on Mental Health Parity Act and get quick solutions for your test.

What is Mental Health Parity Act?

The Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 was a landmark piece of legislation that sought to address the inequality in healthcare for individuals suffering from mental illness. Prior to this law, there were no laws in place that required insurance companies to treat mental health care on the same terms as physical health care. This meant that many people with mental illness would be denied coverage or be forced to pay much higher out-of-pocket costs for treatment than those without such conditions. The Mental Health Parity Act changed all of this by requiring insurance companies to offer mental health benefits on par with medical and surgical benefits, ensuring that individuals with mental illness would no longer face discrimination when seeking out health care coverage.The Mental Health Parity Act has had far-reaching implications for individuals suffering from mental illnesses. It has allowed many more people access to treatments and therapies they may not have previously been able to afford. Additionally, it has helped reduce stigma surrounding mental illness as well as the discrimination associated with it by making access to necessary treatments more equitable across all segments of society. Finally, this law has also allowed employers and insurers more flexibility in providing coverage for employees suffering from a wide variety of mental illnesses without fear of liability or financial loss due to expensive treatments. Despite its positive impact, some critics have argued that the Mental Health Parity Act does not go far enough in protecting those who suffer from a severe form of depression or other serious psychological conditions; some argue that these individuals should receive additional protections under the law because their treatment requires significantly more resources than someone with an anxiety disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While these criticisms are valid, there is still much work left to be done before true parity is achieved between physical and mental healthcare coverage options available today; however, the passage of this act was an important step towards achieving greater equality between those seeking treatment for both physical and psychological issues alike.