Socrates in Prison and The Speech of the Laws of Athens Essay Example
Socrates in Prison and The Speech of the Laws of Athens Essay Example

Socrates in Prison and The Speech of the Laws of Athens Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
Topics:
  • Pages: 3 (692 words)
  • Published: November 29, 2021
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Life is not worth living with a wretched, and damaged body, the context of these words was from Socrates explaining to Crito of the necessity to live with own personal beliefs. The citizenship term understanding to Socrates is developed with the premise that if he had chosen to act in accordance with the reasons Crito offered him will defy the opinions of a knowledgeable man. He quoted to Crito that following the demands of the multitude will damage the rule of law which examining the context of their conversation a rule without enforcement and subjects is worthless within the society since it is not applicable and fails to be obeyed by whom it was supposed to bind within its legislation. The discourse of their conversation seemingly develops the concept of Kant school of reasoning on morality and ethics (p. 123)

Soc

...

rates described that he couldn’t act so as for being bound by Crito agreements, a decision which could go contrary to his will. Examining the question was observing the rule of law more important than human life, in the Socrates story develops without alterations. Socrates perceives himself as an important model within the society, and the situational decision that he was about to make was critical. He develops the criterion of analyzing the decision of perception of that which is worthwhile and that which is not. He used a narrative method of inquiry developing three subjects, the trainer, trainee and “anybody’s opinions”, (p. 121) in his reply he explained to Crito about what should mostly influence our decision should be our own will and not a multitude influenced. Hence he developed the value of judgment and

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

its later implications, he clearly stated that he is a sort of man who is only persuaded by the arguments which prove the best later with its consequences (p.120).

The role of law is developed within the Speech of Laws of Athens, he defines laws as the most influential object within the society and that any city without any legal judgment which is judicially executed are not rules. Furthermore, the Socrates decision to obey the Athenians laws is influenced by the fact that citizenship requires one to abide by the agreement in which the governing laws are established (p.125). He further develops the fact that laws definitely shape the society and individuals lives, configured to answer the reason to why laws govern the responsibilities of parents on how to raise their young ones develops the vivid image of how Socrates understands the rules of law being the spearheading the justice in the society.

The Speech of the Laws of Athens appears to intrinsically motives justifying the reason why Socrates had chosen to die rather than being unjust to the law despite being offered a way out and vanish from Athens. The development of the speech convince Socrates of the gratifications he attained living in Athens, and the City pleased his will (p. 127) and thus he is subjected to answer the question why not at his worst time of trial should he leave the City and to the family which he founded within the city laws thus going against its will.

Socrates the concept of God’s will is bound by the law which governs our fates of lives, the development of the Speech further outlines the God’s purpose

for us being guided by the best will in any situation any human may found himself or herself in. Hence prior he convinces Crito on what he refers to as the agreement of citizenship and the best way to prevent injuries that may be referred to as injustice to the law (p.129).

The concept of Kant’s school of thought on free will explains the reason to why Socrates declined Crito offer and the multitude expectations, whereas he did bind himself to the Law and free self will upon which he had learnt from the influences of nature laws and hence being nurtured by their agreement despite the situation which he was subjected to one must obey and respect them so as to avoid betrayal and that citizenship may be bound by the agreements of the laws.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New