Paying College Athletes Essay

accepting endorsements but also penalized with fines based on the amount collected (Wilbon 23). Therefore, it is essential to ensure that athletes have the freedom to enjoy the benefits they earn from their individual activities. Fining athletes for the contributions made on their behalf is absurd since the students are not at fault and are being compensated for showcasing their talents.

There is a need for instituted changes and appropriate models in college systems in order to create a working structure that caters to individual controls and models (Wilbon 47). The NCAA should reconsider their controls and establish more flexible models that align with individual contributions to the sport. It is astonishing to note the numerous deals that the NCAA has agreed upon with major sports companies in the US, such as deals worth over 10 billion dollars for just three weeks of sport annually over a span of ten years. Sports broadcasters provide substantial funding to the NCAA and colleges for broadcasting their sport (Cohen 43).

However, the colleges do not provide any financial compensation to the athletes who dedicate their lives to achieving the desired results according to these models. It is crucial to implement necessary changes in order to regulate and establish appropriate structures for sharing the revenue with the athletes. There needs to be a reformation as colleges and the NCAA are benefiting immensely from the agreements made on behalf of the players participating in their teams. Hence, changes are imperative to guarantee a fair distribution of resources to the athletes who enable and contribute to these agreements.

One argument against paying students is that athletes already receive benefits from colleges, such as shared

facilities and sportswear. According to Chudacoff (5), athletes are already given preferential treatment, including state-of-the-art facilities. However, these facilities and sportswear are necessary for players in these leagues, not extra compensation. Providing top-notch equipment and treatment allows players to perform their best, benefiting the colleges by showcasing their talents.

Despite facing criticism, the idea of paying college athletes, including giving them salaries equal to college staff, has been a topic of debate. Critics argue that implementing such a system would present logistical challenges for most colleges. However, an alternative proposal suggests allocating a small portion of the NCAA's substantial revenue to provide students with an opportunity to nurture their talents. If colleges and the NCAA can establish a valuation method for TV rights worth billions, it should not be seen as an overwhelming task to allocate a fraction of those funds to support student athletes. By doing so, these athletes can benefit from the money they have earned and utilize it to enhance their skills for future success. Ultimately, it is crucial to grant athletes the chance to enjoy the rewards resulting from financial contributions made towards sports.

Both actors, musicians, and college athletes should have the opportunity to benefit from their talent. They all put in significant effort to achieve success and deserve the chance to develop and profit from their abilities. However, there is a discrepancy in how athletes are treated compared to other professionals. Just like professional athletes worldwide, individuals should be allowed to capitalize on their talents. For example, in the UK, an 18-year-old student with exceptional football skills could be sold for millions of dollars while still attending college. This raises the

question of whether these students should face penalties for their performances. The NCAA needs to address these important questions and concerns to ensure fair treatment for deserving students within the educational system. One way of achieving this is through compensating them.

The notion that the students receiving scholarships may be considered unfair, given they have been offered the same incentive for many years, can be viewed as unjust. Scholarships have been provided to students since the 1970s when the sports industry was making $50,000, and it is expected that this support should persist even when teams are generating over $1 billion (Cohen 33). It is essential to acknowledge the disparity in utilized models and recognize that the current structure is crucial and highly influential in establishing effective regulation for the future. Embracing dynamic models within these systems is imperative to ensure individual models can adjust to changes in the sports industry.

The system should be flexible and not limited to individual scholarships, allowing students to benefit in various ways. It is important to ensure that individuals have the chance to develop a more efficient process for controlling and advancing a specific model for the future. Motivation plays a crucial role in achieving excellence, but if the main motivation revolves around obtaining a college scholarship in an era where colleges earn billions from sports, there is a significant gap that needs addressing within the current system. Despite challenges such as logistics and justifying salaries, there is an opportunity to restructure and compensate athletes. The NCAA must review its rules and give athletes the chance to profit from the models they have been using for many years.

Dynamism is

important and developing new models that match the present changes that have been observed in sports.

Works Cited

1. Chudacoff, H. P. "Let’s Not Pay College Athletes - WSJ." N.p., 28 Mar. 2016. Web. <http://www.wsj.com/articles/lets-not-pay-college-athletes-1459206949>.
2. Cohen, Ben. "The Case for Paying College Athletes." Wall Street Journal 16 (2011).
3. Reed, K. "Solution Regarding Paying College Athletes or Not is Simple." N.p., 13 Nov. 2015. Web. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ken-reed/solution-regarding-paying_b_8556872.html>.
4. Wilbon, Michael. "College athletes deserve to be paid." ESPN. com (2011).