Should students’ athletes be paid? Some individuals do not think that they ought to, and they claim that they should never be paid .while opponent argue that they do not deserve a pay on what they do, other people would like them to get paid as it is their right to get a share of the millions of dollars which comes about courtesy of what they do. While the athletes’ being denied some compensation is unfair to them, there ought to be certain rules which enhance that justice prevails and there is no exploitation.
The opposition of college athletes receiving a pay over their performance has various points of concern and numerous of such concerns wind up as a sense of justice as well as students focus. To begin with, when the students sign to play games at a sponsored college, they are usually conscious of what they are getting themselves into and if they have an issue with it, it is optional, and they could opt not to sign the national letter of intent. It is made clear to them that they would not be receiving any money or gift for what they would be doing in sport .In this regard, athletic in colleges is a choice and not a job and those who wish to receive gifts or money for their participation in sports ought to enroll to take part in the amateur league (Comeaux &Eddie, 89). They should not play in anticipation for something in return. Some leagues have some limitations for those students wishing to join them, and there are no restrictions lik...
e one is entering college to play only .These days, athletes perceive colleges as a hindrance for them to getting to professional leagues but in reality colleges are a path for them to becoming pros, and if only they could realize how hard it is to become a pro, then they would value playing in college (White et al., 399). If they are not joining colleges for one goal of furthering their studies, then they better not join. It is only logic that the students athletes should not be paid as they play deliberately hence no pay for their participation in sports. Furthermore, they ought to understand what they are signing when they sign the NLI and wish to get the college education as a bit of their compensation. If they prioritize going pro and disregarding college education, they ought not to sign NLI and cart off a free academic experience from another individual. There is no point in students joining college, playing, getting paid and not making the most out of the academic advantage that they get.
On the other hand, it is incredibly unfair for example to use athletes’ images along with likeness and not pay them and this has been found as an offense against antitrust laws. Top coaches along with other officials in sports get more than they deserve while the students get nothing. With the cash they usually pocket and considering the fact that they have assistants as well as advisers, they are “overpaid “compared to instructors with many students whos
accomplishment is entrusted to them, and they are not paid as much. Some schools are even known to pay millions of dollars to their coaches (Lopiano & Donna A, 217). In history, coaches worked principally for their love for sport. It is only unreasonable presently that with all the money brought about by sports, schools do not find it fair to pay the athletes while they pay a lot to the coaches and other officials, and it is well known that sport is a multibillion money business. Regardless of the fact that the students are given complete scholarships along with free education, they should be given the privilege of enjoying part of the billions of cash which pours in the industry but some of which disappears into holes like the ever rising coaches’ wages.
Furthermore, college athletes usually have to struggle to balance their education with perfecting their participation in sports. They spend a lot of hours on the game, for instance, more than forty hours equivalent to the hours which an individual who is full time employed works and such hours are divided in training along with other games sessions which they attend. These sessions are compulsory if at all they want to stay in the team as well as maintain their full scholarship. They still have a school schedule which they ought to follow if they want to remain in school as well as play sports in college. Considering all this, it is clear that the students usually have a very tight schedule which they must abide by. This means that studying in addition to playing is demanding for the students, and it takes their perseverance along with a lot of determination on their part to balance on the two(Webbe &Frank ,319). Physical endurance is a must for the students if they want to play and study. It is therefore very unreasonable to deny them a share of the billions which they work so hard to bring to the industry and their efforts go unrewarded. If they should not be paid as a job, then they should be given to reward them for their hard work and perseverance and this money should not be enjoyed by other individuals who do not contribute as much as the players do. Without the athletes, the sports would not exist. College students deserve some share of what they tirelessly work for in their college years and this means they ought to be considered.
While those against students athletes being paid site that the students have been given scholarship and that their primary mission in school is to study and that they are aware of no pay when they enroll, those in favor are likewise worried that not paying them is similar to exploiting them. However, just because the students are usually given full scholarship does not mean that they have to be completely denied from enjoying the fruits of their labor because there is usually a lot of money (Mcdonnell & Brian, 111).The benefits of paying students athletes, for instance, would make the sport a lot more aggressive along with making the students understand