Payment for Students’ Athletes Essay Example
Payment for Students’ Athletes Essay Example

Payment for Students’ Athletes Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 12 (3192 words)
  • Published: November 5, 2021
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Should students’ athletes be paid? Some individuals do not think that they ought to, and they claim that they should never be paid .while opponent argue that they do not deserve a pay on what they do, other people would like them to get paid as it is their right to get a share of the millions of dollars which comes about courtesy of what they do. While the athletes’ being denied some compensation is unfair to them, there ought to be certain rules which enhance that justice prevails and there is no exploitation. The opposition of college athletes receiving a pay over their performance has various points of concern and numerous of such concerns wind up as a sense of justice as well as students focus. To begin with, when the students sign to play games

...

at a sponsored college, they are usually conscious of what they are getting themselves into and if they have an issue with it, it is optional, and they could opt not to sign the national letter of intent.

It is made clear to them that they would not be receiving any money or gift for what they would be doing in sport .In this regard, athletic in colleges is a choice and not a job and those who wish to receive gifts or money for their participation in sports ought to enroll to take part in the amateur league (Comeaux &Eddie, 89). They should not play in anticipation for something in return. Some leagues have some limitations for those students wishing to join them, and there are no restrictions like one is entering college to play only .These days,

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

athletes perceive colleges as a hindrance for them to getting to professional leagues but in reality colleges are a path for them to becoming pros, and if only they could realize how hard it is to become a pro, then they would value playing in college (White et al., 399). If they are not joining colleges for one goal of furthering their studies, then they better not join.

It is only logic that the students athletes should not be paid as they play deliberately hence no pay for their participation in sports. Furthermore, they ought to understand what they are signing when they sign the NLI and wish to get the college education as a bit of their compensation. If they prioritize going pro and disregarding college education, they ought not to sign NLI and cart off a free academic experience from another individual. There is no point in students joining college, playing, getting paid and not making the most out of the academic advantage that they get. On the other hand, it is incredibly unfair for example to use athletes’ images along with likeness and not pay them and this has been found as an offense against antitrust laws. Top coaches along with other officials in sports get more than they deserve while the students get nothing.

With the cash they usually pocket and considering the fact that they have assistants as well as advisers, they are “overpaid “compared to instructors with many students whose accomplishment is entrusted to them, and they are not paid as much. Some schools are even known to pay millions of dollars to their coaches (Lopiano & Donna A, 217). In

history, coaches worked principally for their love for sport. It is only unreasonable presently that with all the money brought about by sports, schools do not find it fair to pay the athletes while they pay a lot to the coaches and other officials, and it is well known that sport is a multibillion money business. Regardless of the fact that the students are given complete scholarships along with free education, they should be given the privilege of enjoying part of the billions of cash which pours in the industry but some of which disappears into holes like the ever rising coaches’ wages. Furthermore, college athletes usually have to struggle to balance their education with perfecting their participation in sports.

They spend a lot of hours on the game, for instance, more than forty hours equivalent to the hours which an individual who is full time employed works and such hours are divided in training along with other games sessions which they attend. These sessions are compulsory if at all they want to stay in the team as well as maintain their full scholarship. They still have a school schedule which they ought to follow if they want to remain in school as well as play sports in college. Considering all this, it is clear that the students usually have a very tight schedule which they must abide by. This means that studying in addition to playing is demanding for the students, and it takes their perseverance along with a lot of determination on their part to balance on the two(Webbe &Frank ,319). Physical endurance is a must for the students if they want to play

and study.

It is therefore very unreasonable to deny them a share of the billions which they work so hard to bring to the industry and their efforts go unrewarded. If they should not be paid as a job, then they should be given to reward them for their hard work and perseverance and this money should not be enjoyed by other individuals who do not contribute as much as the players do. Without the athletes, the sports would not exist. College students deserve some share of what they tirelessly work for in their college years and this means they ought to be considered. While those against students athletes being paid site that the students have been given scholarship and that their primary mission in school is to study and that they are aware of no pay when they enroll, those in favor are likewise worried that not paying them is similar to exploiting them. However, just because the students are usually given full scholarship does not mean that they have to be completely denied from enjoying the fruits of their labor because there is usually a lot of money (Mcdonnell & Brian, 111).The benefits of paying students athletes, for instance, would make the sport a lot more aggressive along with making the students understand that it is not a job would outweigh the possible threats in the industry.

This would work if certain regulations were put in place to monitor whether the students gets a small share as well as ensuring that the students erase the mentality that they are entitled to pay at the end of the play. The opposition of students not being paid

also argues that paying them comes with a lot of problems. Historically athletes in colleges were being recruited to be paid after they play. However with time this changed and a sanity code was adopted in 1948 which limited monetary help to fees along with tuition and the intensity of payment to students in college have risen in the past few years. Such arguments might have been brought up due to the massive amount s of cash made by sports, and they want their share or by other factors. There are sensible things to consider before concluding that they should not be paid.

How much for instance would they be paid and what about when one gets hurt and does not play? What about the non-revenue sports at the college level who do not make as much money as the others or end up losing all in their sports programs? The unpleasant result of paying the athletes, therefore, is inevitable to such sports, and that would be the elimination of some or most of the non-revenue games, and that is not what athletes bargain for. Students should stop thinking that playing in college is a right and not a privilege and in reality, it is the other way round. Furthermore, students athletes are well known to have spending problems and chances that if they are paid they would spend the money wisely are very little. If they get the kind of money they anticipate, the more they would be broke because they will be waiting for more hence they would not manage it well. Even students who take finances studies mainly investment classes are not provided

with a lot of money to apply investment skills and likewise, student athletes ought not to be given thousands of cash only for them to end up in financial problems at their age. Conversely, despite the fact that the athletic scholarship was approved in the 1950’s it fails to cover everything from admission to graduation hence meaning that the scholarship does not offer “free “education.

Furthermore, scholarship is generally a year (renewable) contract which could be ended by the school or the coach in any year for any motive. The full scholarship is not a good pact for the athletes, and they struggle to get by. There are also additional costs which are connected with one being an athlete and which the tuition does not cover as well as vital expenditure which is not catered for by the scholarship. Athletes, for instance, could miss their meals owing to much of their time being taken by training as well as studying.

Other additional costs, for example, buying or renting of suits so that they can attend compulsory banquets which are expensive and which are not catered for by scholarships requires money which they do not have. To many individuals, these additional expenses appear like a minor price for a student who is receiving a full scholarship but in reality, these small expenses pose a challenge to them (Harper et al., 514) It should not be forgotten that scholarship is the primary reason that the students are in college, and most of them come from less fortunate families, and their parents are the kind of parents who one cannot look up to. For some students to survive, for instance

through clothing and to feeding themselves, they usually end up getting part-time employment and this is overwhelming. All this happens while coaches along with other administrators make a six figure income while the players bring about riches for their masters (colleges) while they receive less for their endeavors. While opponents of payment of student athletes associate it with a lot of additional problems, proponents assert that the scholarship they get does not cover all their expenses and some struggle to survive.

Nonetheless, just because some athletes fail to manage their spending does not mean that payment should completely be banned from the athletes. The advantages of paying them in addition to teaching them how to spend as well as save would help them a great deal, and that would prevail over the possible overspending. This could be possible if the students are enlightened on the importance of saving along with them being given a share which would keep them going for a period before they get to the next pay. What's more, not all students’ athletes could misuse the money which they are given and denying them compensation in the name of mismanagement making some suffer while in college would only be inhuman. The media has played a significant role in sports, for instance, helping in recruiting of athletes.

This is usually a channel, through which sports in colleges are simplified for example because the coaches could contact, recruit as well as gather information about certain players. Likewise, it is an essential channel for the student-athletes to be recruited, by lifting up their social profiles by interacting with students, local fans, and coaches along with other recruits

in unimaginable ways and within a short period. Considering this, it is therefore correct to conclude that the athletes should not be paid because it is like their recruitment comes very quickly through the media. The media helps them to get their way into the sports and many thanks to the social media they end up becoming pros. They are usually done a favor by the media in getting them somewhere to exercise their skills.

The exposure which they get is a life changing experience which gives the schools very commendable recruits. The efforts of athletes along with coaches are brought together by social media incredibly so the athletes ought not to be paid because they just put a little effort which privileges them to more exposure as they play for the schools. However, with the simplicity of things by the social media, the athletes could now market themselves through it to many schools. Being a public connecting site, students especially the top prospects of many colleges are at an advantage because they are more anticipated for by various schools. Athletic departments along with coaches are now in a position to monitor how rival schools are connecting with their prospects. They could as well identify how fans along with the followers of the competing colleges are interacting with the prospects.

This means that the athletic departments along with coaches do all this because they know how important these prospects would be to their schools and how their rivals are drooling for them. The question now remains why they value them that much when they have not owned them, but exploit them when they get them? These athletes

could market themselves in the social media and could land on schools which would appreciate what they do by giving them some appreciation, but that seems never to be the case. In this regard, the students deserve to be paid because before they join the schools which they do, they are usually very desirable but once they are owned by schools they become “laborers” and the reasons why these schools recruit them is because they know that they can deliver as there are those who are left out hence they should be paid. Whereas using the social media could help athletes land their dream school, and acts as a channel for them to exercise their passion, those for them being paid are worried that it serves as a green light for them not to be paid.

Though they are easily connected with their desired schools, this does not give the schools the right not to pay them simply because they appeared desperate to join their schools. The gain of paying these athletes when they start playing for the schools would mean more gain to the school as they would be motivated to improve their performance. This would be enhancing the schools learning to appreciate the athletes by rewarding them and consequently encouraging the student athletes to put more effort to make more money for the schools through their sport. Opponents of students athletes not being paid also argue that playing in school is a stepping stone to their professional career hence they could wait for that time when they would be making millions. While it seems that student athletes make much money for their schools and

get nothing, the reality is that they benefit just as the school does from the money.

They are provided with education at no cost, snacks, tutors, counseling as well as an opportunity to extend their profession. Even though they were to be given cash, it is plausible that they would use it all, therefore, creating distractions for those around them and themselves. Paying them would be detrimental to their long-term future and it would as well create a divide between them and regular learners. On the other hand, it is unreasonable that students’ athletes don’t get paid, and the money which is made from sports is not mechanically reinvested in research as well as education.

If the money earned was being used in funding for example research in the school, it would be hard to argue that the athletes deserve a cut. Unfortunately, much of what is earned by sports never goes directly to the classrooms, and if that were the case, for instance, Alabama along with Texas would be having an additional academic opportunity than any learning institution in the U.S. Instead, the profits are usually shared among the coaches, administrators as well as athletic directors. At times, funds are taken from a given school and used in funding sports for instance in getting themselves other coaches, and they use massive amounts of money which would attract prominent coaches.

With the effort that the athletes put in to bring those millions, in addition to the schools capitalizing on the celebrity of these athletes and not giving them a thing, is morally wrong to deny them a share. The schools also ban the students from using their likeness

for monetary gain meaning they cannot charge for things like the signing of autographs(Wong M ,253) .This is questionable because and the players ought to be considered because it is many thanks to them that the schools ‘ names get famous in addition to making money for them. While those who oppose students from getting paid affirm that the school is doing the students a favor in growing their talent, I think that it is not right to deny them a pay and instead have the money which they make misused. Only because the schools are helping the athletes in developing their talent that is not enough reason why they should not enjoy part of what they bring to their schools especially as they have to remain dedicated as sport is time consuming(Fertman ; Carl I,15).

Paying the students some small amounts and ensuring that the money they make is not spent irrelevantly would do the schools more good than harm. Making of policies to ensure that the athletes get a cut and the rest is invested in education issues would guarantee fairness to both. Finally, the best solution for this ever heated debate is to make stricter laws for both the schools along with the students. Such laws would require that committees be made so that it would settle for the best as well as the fairest rules for the student athletes along with schools.

There would be conditions under which the students could be paid. Schools as well would follow certain rules mainly relating to the exploitation of student athletes. The laws to be used should be enforced by both the schools along with the

players’ representatives. The new rules would enhance that the opponents become calm while at the same time guaranteeing more rights in addition to more harmonious living between the students and the schools.

Work Cited

  1. Webbe, Frank. The Handbook of Sport Neuropsychology. New York: Springer Pub, 2011. Print.
  2. White, Fred D, and Simone J. Billings.

    Well-crafted Argument: A Guide and Reader. , 2017. Print.

  3. Lopiano, Donna A. Athletic Director's Desk Reference.

    , 2014. Print.

  4. Wong, Glenn M. Essentials of Sports Law. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2010. Print.
  5. Mcdonnell, Brian. Behind the Curtain of the Ncsaa: The Imbalances in the Definition of the.

    Place of publication not identified: Lulu Com, 2012. Print.

  6. Comeaux, Eddie. Introduction to Intercollegiate Athletics. , 2015.

    Print.

  7. Harper, Shaun R, and Frank Harris. College Men and Masculinities: Theory, Research, and Implications for Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010. Print.
  8. Fertman, Carl I. Student-athlete Success: Meeting the Challenges of College Life.

    Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2009. Print.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New