Paying College Athletes Annotated Bibliography Essay Example

system. The arguments that have been made by the author are accurate although the author fails to develop a structure that discusses and assesses loyalties and other monetary issues that palyers need to get. The author has a unique view since he observes that athletes are not employees and as such the logistical nightmare that the board would need to sort would be massive. It is therefore a proper research model that has been defined and modelled to keep in line with the individual aspects and controls that are needed by the system accordingly.

• Cohen, Ben. "The Case for Paying College Athletes." Wall Street Journal 16 (2011).

Summary

Cohen observes that there is a high level of irregularity that can be cited among the sanctions and models that are used across different sports and fines that are given. According to Cohen, there have been no definition and proper models that have been derived to ensure that they give a proper account and model of compensating athletes and fining those who bypass the rules. The rules of amateurism according to Cohen therefore, need to be redefined if there is a chance of making proper progress and helping the athletes in the society (Cohen 22). Cohen points to the differences in the amounts of fines that are levied to athletes and the high amount of money that is made by the athletes in different competition yearly.

Analysis

According to Cohen, it is not feasible for athletes to only get scholarship when the NCAA is making billions in endorsements. In the 1970s when there was a 50000 dollar price for the TV rights, the students were still given only scholarships to facilitate their study.

The NCAA has failed to be dynamic and improve the standards of the individuals but increased the amount of fines levied against players found to breach the code of conduct set. It is therefore, essential to ensure that there is a development of proper criteria and approaches that can help in giving the students the best level of tutelage as well as payment. The source however, disregards the facilities and perks that the athletes currently enjoy and how these have transformed their lives in the present careers.

• Reed, K. "Solution Regarding Paying College Athletes or Not is Simple." N.p., 13 Nov. 2015. Web. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ken-reed/solution-regarding-paying_b_8556872.html>.

Summary

Reed on the other hand, observes that athletes need to be paid although this would take the form of allowing the students to take up endorsements with companies and selling their memorabilia. Reed notes that although there is a question of logistics from the approaches and models that can be used in compensating the athletes, these are not significant in giving a proper control or model that is needed in the approaches used (Reed 74). Reid notes that although he understands the scepticism surrounding paying athletes, it is important for there to be structure that monitors and develops important aspects and controls in the systems accordingly. Athletes should therefore, be allowed to gain from their talents that is the case with the professional musicians and actors in college.

Analysis

Athletes are treated to the amateurism code or model that is not feasible and lacks the level of controls and models that are needed in the system accordingly. There is a difference between the approaches that are used to define the output of the players and they

need to enjoy their perks as the NCAA and the colleges enjoy. The solution according to Reed is therefore, simple and students need to be given a chance to benefit from their talent as other students do. Reed argues that although the logistical nightmare may prevent payment from the college departments, it is important to ensure that the payment models match important criteria and approaches needed in the systems accordingly. There is a difference in the approaches that the colleges may use and facilitation may be difficult but it is still essential that the students get the best from their talents.

• Wilbon, Michael. "College athletes deserve to be paid." ESPN. com (2011).

Summary

Wilbon observes that the amount of money that the NCAA is making for Tv rights and other endorsements need to be allocated to a student fund or kitty and the students gain from their efforts. Wilbon is adamant that the NCAA has signed an 11billion contract for three weekends with CBS and Turner sports and ESPN. These are massive resources that are generated and availed to the body by the athletes who give their lives to the sport (Wilbon 18). The students however, get no money and are fined for their actions in the process where they are not allowed to gain any advantage citing it to be an amateur sport. Wilbon argues that although the logistical information and models needed to pay the athletes may be a nightmare, it is important to implement structures that are aimed at giving the athletes some of the money made.

Analysis

The lucrative deals that the sports colleges and departments make on their account are very many and there needs to

be a system to replicate the same to the athletes. The golden generation of athletes and the recent debates has increased the need for a change in systems and the US needs to stop punishing the players for their talents. There needs to be an equitable approach of payment if equity is the problem but players need to get some form of payment for their efforts. The source is important in highlighting different amounts and research on the level of commitment that TV stations have invested. It therefore compounds the topic and develops a better models of understanding that is needed in the system and approaches derived. The source supports payment of athletes in the system and gives a good account of the reasons for these changes with the author highlighting all the pertinent aspects that need to be derived.

Bibliography

1. Chudacoff, H. P. "Let’s Not Pay College Athletes - WSJ." N.p., 28 Mar. 2016. Web. <http://www.wsj.com/articles/lets-not-pay-college-athletes-1459206949>.
2. Cohen, Ben. "The Case for Paying College Athletes." Wall Street Journal 16 (2011).
3. Reed, K. "Solution Regarding Paying College Athletes or Not is Simple." N.p., 13 Nov. 2015. Web. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ken-reed/solution-regarding-paying_b_8556872.html>.
4. Wilbon, Michael. "College athletes deserve to be paid." ESPN. com (2011).