Oral COM Ch.16 and 18
Unlock all answers in this set
Unlock answersquestion
Outlining Speeches
answer
A good outline helps organize ideas and make sure you have enough evidence to support your claims. Also provides you with a safety net in case you forget what you intend to say.
question
Working Outline
answer
Give speakers a basic map of the speech. Just for the speaker; it is her/his sketch of the speech. Speaker usually jots down many ideas to see how the ideas fit together. When finished, can tell where more evidence is needed, where ideas don't seem well connected and so forth. Often include abbreviations and shorthand that only makes sense to speaker.
question
Formal outline
answer
includes all main points and sub points, supporting materials, and transitions, along with a bibliography of sources. Has main headings for the introduction, body, and conclusion. Under each point (main) are sub points, references to supporting materials and abbreviated transitions. Also quotes, statistics and other evidence. Also do work cited.
question
Key word outline
answer
Includes only key words for each point. Purpose is to trigger the speaker's memory of each point. may include abbreviations and shorthand that makes sense only to speaker.
question
Organizing the body of the speech
answer
Develops and supports the central idea/thesis statement, by organizing it into several points that are distinct yet related. 8 organizational patterns.
question
Time pattern
answer
organize ideas on the basis of temporal relationships. Listeners find it easy to follow a time pattern because we often think in terms of temporal order. What follows what, what comes first and what comes next. Emphasizes progression, development or change. Useful for describing processes that take place overtime.
question
Spatial pattern
answer
organize ideas according to physical relationships. Appropriate for speeches that describe or explain layouts, geographic relationships, or connections between objects or parts of a system. Used to structure both informative and persuasive speeches.
question
Topical pattern
answer
order a presentation into several categories/classes/areas of discussion. Appropriate when topic breaks down into two/three areas that aren't related temporarily/spatially/casually or otherwise. Be effective for persuasive speeches.
question
Star pattern
answer
Includes several main points that work together to support a speech's overall theme. A variation on the topical structure but it's more organic in tying each point to an overriding theme. Also more flexible. 2 or 3 points that a speaker covers in the same order and to the same extent each time the speech is given.
question
Wave pattern
answer
consists of repetition. Each main idea builds up from evidence and then crests in a main point. More evidence follows, leading to the crest of another wave. Each crest repeats the main theme, using the same words or variations on them.
question
Comparative pattern
answer
Compare 2 or more objects/people/situations/events/other phenomena. Also called comparison/contrast and analogical organization. Encourages listeners to be aware of similarities/differences between 2 or more things. Effective in helping listeners understand a new idea/process/event. Appropriate for informative and persuasive speeches.
question
Problem-solution pattern
answer
Divides a topic into major areas: a problem and a solution. Speaker describes a problem and its severity and then proposes a solution. Sequence sometimes flipped. Uses for informative and persuasive speeches.
question
Cause-effect and effect-cause pattern
answer
Used to argue a direct relationship between 2 things, a cause and an effect. Speakers want to inform people that a situation, policy or practice results from certain previous choices/events. Others argue that a specific action (cause) will lead to a desired/undesired effect.
question
Designing the introduction
answer
1st thing listeners hear. Accomplishes 4 goals: 1) Gets listeners' motivation and attention 2) Presents a clear thesis statement 3) Enhances the speaker's credibility 4) Previews how the speech will be developed.
question
Getting listener's attention and motivating them to listen
answer
First objective of an intro. Get accomplished because listeners are motivated to listen when something catches their attention. Ways to get people's attention: Dramatic piece of evidence (quote, visual aid, statistic), a question, refer to current events, direct experience and humor.
question
Presenting a clear thesis statement
answer
2nd function of an intro. Thesis statement/main message of your speech. Short clear sentence that directly states the overall theme of your presentation. Not a full description of the content of the speech. Should only announce the key ideas of speech so that listeners have a clear understanding of your focus.
question
Building Credibility
answer
3rd function of an intro. Listeners regard a speaker as credible if he/she seems qualified to speak on a topic, shows good will toward them, and demonstrates dynamism or involvement with the topic.
question
Previewing the body
answer
Final purpose of an intro. Tell listeners about coming attractions. Want to preview your major points so that listeners understand how you will develop ideas and can follow you. Preview announces the main points of your speech. Preview enumerates or lists the main points.
question
Crafting the conclusion
answer
Speaker's last chance to drive home the main points of a presentation. An effective conclusion summarizes content and provides a memorable final thought. In repeating key ideas and leaving the audience with a compelling final thought, a speaker provides psychological closure on the speech. Conclusions are short, taking less than 5% of total speaking time. Effective to restate your thesis and each major point. Can do this in a sentence or two. Offer listeners a final thought.
question
Building in Transitions
answer
Final organizational issue. Words and sentences that connect ideas and main points in a speech so that listeners can follow a speaker. Signals you are through talking about one idea and are ready to connect it to the next one. Sign posts for listeners. Tell listeners where you have been, where you are and where you are heading. To move from 1 point to another, you can use statements that summarize what you've said in 1 part and point the way to another. Can also be nonverbal.
question
Causes of communication apprehension
answer
2 types- Situational and chronic. Apprehension is likely to be present when talking to unfamiliar people/situations, being in the spotlight, being evaluated and past failure/failures in a particular speaking situation. Difficult to manage when it's chronic.
question
Reducing communication apprehension- Systematic desensitization
answer
method of treating many fears. Focuses on reducing the tension that surrounds the feared event. Teaches people how to relax and thereby reduce the physiological features of anxiety. Goal is to learn to associate feeling relaxed with images of oneself in communication situations.
question
Reducing communication apprehension- Cognitive restructuring
answer
method of helping people change how they think about speaking situations. Speaking is not the problem. Rather, the problem is how we use irrational beliefs to interpret speaking situations. Teaching apprehensive people to identify and challenge negative self statements.
question
Reducing communication apprehension- Positive visualization
answer
Aims to reduce anxiety by guiding apprehensive speakers through imagined positive speaking experiences.
question
Reducing communication apprehension- Skills training
answer
Assumes that lack of speaking skills causes us to be apprehensive about speaking. Focuses on teaching people skills such as how to start conversations, organize ideas, build strong introductions and support claims.
question
Oral style
answer
refers to speakers' visual, vocal and verbal communication with listeners. Visual delivery concerns a speaker's appearance, facial expressions, eye contact, posture, gestures, movement during a presentation and visual aids. Vocal delivery includes volume, pitch, pronunciation, articulation, inflection, pauses and speaking rate. Verbal delivery consists of word choices and sentence structure. It's more personal.
question
Styles of delivery- impromptu style
answer
Involves little preparation. Speakers speak off the cuff, organizing ideas as they talk and working with evidence that's already familiar to them. Used when you make a comment in class and answer a question not anticipated. No time to prepare/rehearse. Highly informal, personal and immediate.
question
Styles of delivery- extemporaneous style
answer
relies on preparation and practice, but actual words and nonverbal behaviors aren't memorized. Requires research, organize ideas, select supporting evidence, prepare visual aids, outline the speech and practice delivery. Requires a fine balance between too little and too much practice. Practice but not to much. May result in being canned.
question
Styles of delivery- manuscript style
answer
involves speaking from the complete manuscript of a speech. After planning, researching, organizing and outlining a presentation, a speaker writes the complete word for word text and practices the presentation using that text provides security to speakers. Limits the speaker to adapt on the spot to listeners.
question
Styles of delivery- memorized style
answer
carries the manuscript one step further. A speaker commits the entire speech to memory and speaks from a manuscript that is in his/her head. An exact text exists, so everything is prepared in advance. Presentation may reflect written rather than oral style. Speaker has no safety net in case of memory lapses. Can limit effective delivery. Difficult to sound spontaneous when speech is memorized.
question
Like all other communication, persuasive speaking
answer
aim to change others by prompting them to think, feel, believe or act differently.
question
Persuasive is not coercion or force
answer
In artistic proof requires no art/skill on our part. Don't have to respect others. Artistic uses reasons and words to motivate, not force. Persuasive relies on artistic, not inartistic proofs.
question
Persuasive impact
answer
Usually gradual and incremental. Usually more gradually toward new ideas, attitudes and actions.
question
The 3 Pillars of Persuasion- Ethos
answer
perceived personal character of the speaker. Tend to attribute high ethos to people if we perceive that they have integrity, they can be trusted, they have goodwill toward us, they know what they are talking about and they are committed to the topic.
question
The 3 Pillars of Persuasion- Pathos
answer
refers to emotional reasons for attitudes, beliefs or actions. We are not just affected by logic but also our feelings: passions, fears, love, desire, personal values, shame and compassion. Appeals to emotions are powerful and dangerous.
question
The 3 Pillars of Persuasion- Logos
answer
rational/logical proof. Logical proofs are arguments, reasoning and evidence to support claims.
question
Forms of reasoning- inductive reasoning
answer
begins with specific examples and uses them to draw a general conclusion
question
Forms of reasoning- deductive reasoning
answer
begins with a general claim that is widely accepted and familiar to listeners
question
Toulmin model of reasoning
answer
includes qualifiers and rebuttals
question
Toulmin model of reasoning- claim
answer
an assertion. On it's own, it's not convincing.
question
Toulmin model of reasoning- grounds
answer
evidence/data that support the claim
question
Toulmin model of reasoning- warrant
answer
an explanation of the relevance of the grounds to the claim
question
Listener's expectations
answer
In educational settings, listeners expect speakers to discuses more than one side on an issue. At campaign rallies, candidates often present only there own side. Expectations may also be shaped by pre speech publicity.
question
Listener's attitudes
answer
If they already favor your position, you may not need to discuss alternative positions in depth. If listeners favor a position different from yours, then it's essential to acknowledge and deal with their views. Failure to consider listeners' opposing ideas diminishes a speaker's credibility.
question
Listener's knowledge
answer
What an audience already knows/ believes about a topic should influence decisions on whether to present one or more sides of an issue. Listeners may be persuaded by arguments that oppose yours if you haven't inoculated them against those arguments.
question
Inoculation
answer
persuasive inoculation \"immunizes\" listeners in audience against opposing ideas and argument that they may encounter in the future.
question
Create common ground with listeners
answer
persuasive speaker tries to move listeners to a point of viewer action. Listeners will be more likely to move with the speaker if they perceive some common ground with him or her.
question
Create common ground with listeners- identification
answer
reorganizing and enlarging commonalities between communicators.
question
Adapt to listeners
answer
Adapted to specific listeners knowledge, attitudes, motives, experiences, values and expectations. Your job is to apply what you learn about your listeners as you develop and present your speech.
question
Avoid fallacious reasoning
answer
An error in reasoning. Present false/flawed logic. Fallacies may be intentional/unintentional. They are not effective with educated or thoughtful audiences. Suggest that the speaker isn't ethical.
question
Fallacy
answer
an error in reasoning
question
Ad Hominem arguments
answer
ones that go to their person instead of the idea. It isn't ethical to argue for your point of view by attacking the integrity of someone who has taking a and opposing yours.
question
Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
answer
\"after this, therefore because of this.\" Sometimes when one thing follows another, we mistakenly think the 1st thing caused the 2nd
question
Qualifier
answer
word/phrase that limits the scope of your claim
question
Rebuttal
answer
a response to listened reservations about a claim made by a speaker
question
Understanding credibility
answer
Tied to how others perceive a speaker. A speaker's credibility doesn't reside in the speaker. It's conferred by listeners or withheld if they find a speaker untrustworthy, unformed or lacking in goodwill.
question
Credibility
answer
A speaker earns by convincing listeners that he/she has a personal integrity, is positively disposed toward them and can be trusted. Arises from 3 pillars of persuasion, ethos, pathos and logos.
question
Types of credibility
answer
credibility isn't static; it can change in the course of communication. Credibility can increase or decrease as a result of a speech.
question
Initial Credibility
answer
expertise and trustworthiness recognized by listeners before a presentation begins. Based on titles, positions, experiences, or achievements that are known to listeners before they hear a speech.
question
Derived Credibility
answer
the expertise and trustworthiness that listeners confer on speaker as a result of how speakers communicate during presentations. By organizing ideas clearly and logically.
question
Terminal Credibility
answer
the credibility of speaker at the end of a presentation. May be greater or less than initial credibility, depending on how effectively a speaker has communicated.
question
Enhancing Credibility- 1
answer
State your qualifications for speaking this topic: experiences you have had, titles or jobs you hold, research you have done.
question
Enhancing Credibility- 2
answer
Show listeners that you care about them- that your speech is relevant to their welfare
question
Enhancing Credibility- 3
answer
Appeal to listeners' emotions, but be careful of overwhelming or alienating listeners with excessively dramatic appeals.
question
Enhancing Credibility- 4
answer
Reason carefully, and avoid reasoning fallacies
question
Enhancing Credibility- 5
answer
Use effective, ethical supporting materials
question
Enhancing Credibility- 6
answer
Communicate both verbally and nonverbally that you care about the topic and are involved with it.
question
Enhancing Credibility- 7
answer
Respond to questions fairly and with an open mind
question
Organizing Speeches for Persuasive Impact- 1
answer
Your introduction should capture listeners' attention, provide a clear thesis statement, establish your credibility and preview your speech.
question
Organizing Speeches for Persuasive Impact- 2
answer
Your conclusion should summarize main points and end with a strong closing statement
question
Organizing Speeches for Persuasive Impact- 3
answer
You should provide internal summaries of main points
question
Organizing Speeches for Persuasive Impact- 4
answer
You should provide smooth transitions between points and the parts of your speech
question
Organizing Speeches for Persuasive Impact- 5
answer
The body of your speech should be organized to reinforce your thesis and show listeners how your ideas cohere.
question
5A- Motivated Sequence Pattern
answer
Developed by public speaking scholar Alan Monroe in the 1930s. Developed for organizing speeches. Follows a natural pattern of human thought by gaining listeners' motivation and personal involvement w/ a problem and its solution. 5 steps: Listeners' attention is drawn to the subject, establishes need by showing that a real and serious problem exists, a speaker recommends a solution, visualization and speakers move to the action step.
question
5B- One-Sided and Two-Sided Presentations
answer
Either presenting only your own point of view or both sides of an issue. Not used for informative speeches. Depends on whether it's effective. Cause of the particular audience a speaker addresses. Good audience analysis is critical to effective public speaking.
question
The Bandwagon Appeal
answer
argues that because most people believe or act a particular way, you should too. More effective to give them good reasons why they should agree with you instead of persuading them to your point of view because other people have been.
question
Slippery slope
answer
claims that once we take the 1st step, more and more steps inevitably will follow until some unacceptable consequence results.
question
Hasty Generalization
answer
a broad claim based on too limited audience. Unethical to assert a broad claim when you have only anecdotal/isolated evidence/instances.
question
Red Herring Argument
answer
speakers who try to deflect listeners from relevant issues. Say something that is irrevelant to their topic or doesn't really respond to a listener's question.
question
Either-Or-Logic
answer
Implies there are only two options. Either and or. Simplistic and fallacious. Ex: Either abolish fraternities on our campus or accept that this is a party school where drinking is more important than studying.
question
Reliance on the Halo Effect
answer
occurs when we generalize a person's authority or expertise in a particular area to other areas that are irrevelant to the person's experience and knowledge. It is wrong to think that because a person is knowledgeable on particular topics, he/she is knowledgeable on all topics.