Mutual Defense Alliance Essay Example
Mutual Defense Alliance Essay Example

Mutual Defense Alliance Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 3 (660 words)
  • Published: October 6, 2017
  • Type: Excerpt
View Entire Sample
Text preview
  1. Russia and Serbia (Russia joined in first after war started between Austria-Hungary and Serbia. Russia was Serbia's confederation. We can state Serbia triggered the concatenation reaction.)
  2. Germany and Austria-Hungary
  3. France and Russia
  4. Britain and France and Belgium
  5. Japan and Britain


Imperialism is when a state increases their power and wealth by conveying extra districts under their control. Before World War 1, Africa and parts of Asia were points of contention amongst the European states for their resources. Tension caused by this because France and Britain had colonies-Germany was seeking to acquire in on the action-wanted more land Nationalism- Serbian black hand/Gavrilo princip.


Germany and Britain were both increasing their


naval forces power=more tenseness and in German and Russia peculiarly. Militarism was having an influence on public policy. Immediate Causes- There's merely one immediate cause.

The blackwash of Franz Ferdinand: P. This event was the culmination of all the aforementioned points. It occurred as a protest against Austria-Hungary's control over this region, as Serbia desired to obtain power over Bosnia and Herzegovina.

This blackwash resulted in Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia. As a consequence, Russia declared war on Austria-Hungary due to their alliance, which then led to Germany's declaration of war, and so on. Upon examining the causes, it appears that Serbia was the primary cause. Additionally, imperialism and militarism played a significant role.

However, the war was not started by them. The commencement of World War 1 was triggered by Serbian patriotism and its

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

confederation system, along with the blackwash from a Serbian patriot. The importance lied in the offense's impact on Austro-Serbian relations. It is crucial to understand, when discussing patriotism, not to claim that the black hand was acting on behalf of the government, as it may result in consequences.

“There is no evidence to suggest that Pasic orchestrated the crime. It is unlikely that the Black Hand officers were acting on behalf of the government, as the military and the Radical Party were actually competing for control over the province.” HOWEVER, IF someone does make this claim, we can counter with, “Pasic’s role centers around reports that he had been alerted about the planned crime and took inadequate steps to inform Austrian authorities. Despite Pasic’s denials."

There is substantial evidence that someone informed him about the secret plan, and that Pasic instructed the Serbian ambassador in Vienna to notify the Austrians that an attempt would be made on the life of the heir during his visit to Bosnia. Instead of directly stating that he was aware of an actual plan, Pasic phrased it as a hypothetical assassination attempt, and implied that a state visit by Franz Ferdinand on the day of Kosovo (June 28) would be too provocative. Austrian diplomats failed to decipher the hidden meaning behind this vague statement. By the time the warning reached the Habsburg joint finance minister (who was responsible for Bosnian affairs), any sense of urgency had already faded.

He did nothing to enhance security or cancel the planned visit of the heir. After the killings, the Serbian authorities were even more unwilling to compromise themselves by admitting any prior knowledge. This led to

Pasic's subsequent denials.

This is similar to the ultimate historiography.

The ultimatum was initially received by Serbia. Pasic expressed his willingness to accept its conditions, with some reservations and requests for clarification. However, as time went on.

It was evident that Russia would support Serbia no matter the situation, causing Pasic to abandon the pursuit of peace. Although a lengthy response was written and sent, Serbia declined the fundamental aspects pertaining to Austrian involvement in its internal legal and law enforcement matters.

Pasic was aware that this signified the start of a war, and the Serbian ground forces commenced mobilization even before obtaining a response. ^– From "The Balkans in the Age of Nationalism" by Steven W. Sowards

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds