How wide is the term injunction, and why are they granted Essay Example

Day Vs. Brownrigg (1878) where an individual was being stalked but had not communicated with the stalker and there was no physical evidence. This made the case challenging to obtain an injunction for.

The Public Interest injunction serves to safeguard the public by preventing certain actions, as demonstrated in the legal case of Attorney General v Harris. Harris was accused of violating his license on 237 counts, but was subject to an injunction that prohibited him from breaking the law.

Harris sold alcohol without a permit after specific hours, which was against the law. Despite this, Harris persisted in his unlawful behavior because it was cheaper to pay the fine for each violation. However, due to negative impacts on public interest, Harris was prevented from continuing this behavior by a public interest injunction. Furthermore, Anton Piller Order is an injunction that allows obtaining a search warrant named after Anton Piller. He used it when he suspected that someone unlawfully copied his product in their factory. Nevertheless, these types of injunctions are rarely granted as they are intrusive and issued only against individuals rather than companies.

The Anton Piller case is relevant when the court suspects that evidence, such as papers or movable property like cash or pirated movies, may be at risk of being destroyed or taken away by the defendant. In these circumstances, the defendant must allow the plaintiff to examine the property. The Mareva Order also relates to freezing assets owned by third parties. In Mareva v International bulk carrier's case, a Mareva injunction prevented a ship from leaving port.

In order to apply for a Mareva injunction, it is important to consider certain factors. One crucial

element is the likelihood that the assets in question will be removed, such as if a vessel is scheduled to dock at a different port soon.