The act of executing individuals, commonly known as the death penalty, is a well-known method of punishment.
The punishment mentioned above is highly delicate as it is solely determined by the government or a legal court decision. The decision is rendered to individuals who have committed treason or first degree murder. Occasionally, the death penalty is perceived as a manifestation of the ancient proverb "an eye for an eye." However, just as the person has committed such serious offenses or crimes, they should eventually be treated with humanity rather than being treated like an animal. This paper aims to examine the current state of capital punishment worldwide and how it is administered as a form of discipline.
From these sentiments, one can infer whether or not the victims of capital punishment deserve this outcome. In the main argument, it can be acknowledge
...d that capital punishment is undoubtedly fair when murderers receive it as their sentence. When someone commits murder, they are implying that life is not valuable. However, when the same act is reversed and the perpetrator becomes the victim, life becomes valuable. This is obviously contradictory, and therefore without blaming anyone, life is precious and everyone wishes to live forever.
In the article "Should The Death Penalty be Allowed?", Bruce Fein, JD argues that capital punishment upholds the defendant's agency and accountability for their own fate, thereby preserving their human dignity. According to Fein, it does not perceive them as lacking moral sense or being vulnerable to being killed for the sake of satisfying human greed. Furthermore, Fein maintains that the death penalty maintains the dignity of those whose lives were taken by the defendant's predatory actions
This demonstrates society's respect for life and serves as a deterrent against criminal behavior. Moreover, it is proposed that the death penalty should be treated equally alongside other forms of punishment.
The article titled "Report Cites Numerous Failings in Applying Death Penalty" by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch expresses concerns regarding the fair and accurate implementation of capital punishment. The publication board emphasizes the importance of providing a fair trial to all individuals on death row. Transparency in the decision-making process is crucial for establishing public trust in the appropriate use of the ultimate penalty for serious criminals. It is essential to treat convicted or sentenced individuals fairly, just like any other citizen guilty of lesser crimes, while acknowledging that victims also have their rights.
The opposition to capital punishment should be stopped or decreased in order to improve society. In conclusion, one can argue against the legalization of capital punishment as a form of punishment because no wrong act can ever be justified and one wrong act cannot correct another. My argument is based on Amnesty International's article "Death Penalty" and their statement that, "Although international law states that capital punishment can be used for the most serious crimes, like murder, Amnesty believes that capital punishment is never the solution. Capital punishment is a symptom of a violent society, not a solution." (2015, July). This quote shows that society should always strive for good rather than evil or wickedness.
This shows that replacing one existence to compensate for the loss of another will never be a solution in terms of logic and humanity.
- Death Penalty Pros And Cons essays
- Is The Death Penalty Effective essays
- Affirmative Action essays
- Assisted Suicide essays
- Capital Punishment essays
- Censorship essays
- Child Labour essays
- Child Protection essays
- Civil Rights essays
- Corporal Punishment essays
- Death Penalty essays
- Empowerment essays
- Euthanasia essays
- Gay Marriage essays
- Gun Control essays
- Human Trafficking essays
- Police Brutality essays
- Privacy essays
- Sex Trafficking essays
- Speech essays
