Ch.9 Torts (Business Law) – Flashcards
Unlock all answers in this set
Unlock answersquestion
            What does the law of torts permit?
answer
        It permits individuals and companies to recover from other individuals and companies for wrongs committed against them.
question
            What does the law of tort provide?
answer
        Tort law provides rights and remedies for conduct that meets the elements required to establish that a wrong has occurred.
question
            What types of wrongs are governed by tort law?
answer
        Civil, or noncriminal wrongs, that are not breaches of contract.
question
            What Latin word does tort come from? And what does it mean?
answer
        Tort comes from the Latin word 'tortus', which means "crooked, dubious, and twisted,"
question
            What is a tort?
answer
        A tort is an interference with someone's person or property.
question
            Examples of tort?
answer
        Entering someone's house without his or her permission is an interference and constitutes the tort of trespass. Causing someone's character to be questioned is a wrong against the person and it is the tort of defamation.
question
            What is the difference between a crime and a tort?
answer
        A crime is a wrong that arises from violation of a public duty whereas a tort is a wrong that arises from a violation of private duty.
question
            For the person who experiences the direct harm?
answer
        The act is called a tort.
question
            For the government, the same act is called?
answer
        A crime.
question
            What happens if the act is both a crime and a tort?
answer
        The government might prosecute the wrongdoer for a violation of criminal law, and the individual who experiences direct harm may recover damages.
question
            The law provides protection against these harms,
answer
        In the form of remedies awarded after the wrongs are committed.
question
            What are the three types of torts?
answer
        Intentional tort, negligence and strict liability.
question
            Intentional Tort
answer
        Intentional torts are those that occur when wrongdoers engage in intentional conduct.
question
            An example of intentional tort
answer
        Striking another person in a fight is an intentional act and would be the tort of battery and possibly also the crime of battery.
question
            Tort of negligence
answer
        Careless actions, or actions taken without thinking through their consequences.
question
            An example of negligence
answer
        Running a red light and hitting another car causing the driver to spin out of control and hit a streetlight. The driver who spun out of control can charge the person who ran the red light on person.
question
            In transmission of disease cases, depending on the facts,
answer
        Both intentional torts and negligence theories may apply.
question
            Strict liability
answer
        Is another type of tort that imposes liability without regard to whether there was any intent to harm or any negligence occurred. Strict liability is imposed without regard to fault.
question
            Why is strict or absolute liability imposed?
answer
        It is imposed because the activity involved is so dangerous that there must be full accountability.
question
            An example of strict liability
answer
        When a construction team is using explosives or dynamite to take down a building or a bridge. They are held with full accountability for the person, or persons or properties that get damaged in the process.
question
            Assault
answer
        Is intentional conduct that threatens a person with a well-founded fear of imminent harm coupled with the present ability to carry out the threat of harm.
question
            Example of assault
answer
        The angry assertion "I'm going to kick your butt" along with aggressive movement in the direction of the victim with the intent to carry out the threat is an assault, even though a third person intervenes to stop the intended action.
question
            Battery
answer
        Is the intentional, wrongful touching of another person without that person's consent. Thus the threat to use force is an assault and the actual use of force is battery.
question
            Example of battery
answer
        When someone puts hands on you.
question
            Thus, a threat to use force is an______, and the actual use of force is the______.
answer
        1) assault  2) battery
question
            True/False. The single action of striking an individual can be both a crime and a tort.
answer
        True.
question
            False Imprisonment
answer
        Is the intentional detention of a person without that person's consent. The detention need not be for any specified period of time, for any detention against one's will is false imprisonment.
question
            What is false imprisonment often called?
answer
        It is often called the shopkeepers tort because so much liability has been imposed on store owners for their unreasonable detention of customers suspected of shoplifting.
question
            Shopkeepers privilege
answer
        Permits the store owner to detain a suspected shoplifter based on reasonable suspicion for a reasonable time without resulting liability for false imprisonment to the accused customer.
question
            Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED)
answer
        A tort involving conduct that goes beyond all bounds of decency and produces mental anguish in the harmed individual. This tort requires proof of outrageous conduct and resulting emotional distress in the victim.
question
            The right of privacy
answer
        Tort of intentional intrusion into the private affairs of another.
question
            Invasion of privacy
answer
        This actually consists of three different torts:   (1) Intrusion into the plaintiffs private affairs.   (2)Public disclosure of private facts.   (3)appropriation of another's name, likeness, or image for commercial advantage.
question
            Right of publicity
answer
        The third tort from invasion of privacy.
question
            What are the elements for the right of publicity tort?
answer
        The elements are: (1) appropriation of the plaintiffs name or likeness for the value associated with it, and not in an incidental manner or for a newsworthy purpose. (2) identification of the plaintiff in the publication. (3) an advantage or benefit to the defendant.
question
            Why was the right to publicity designed?
answer
        It was designed to protect the commercial interest of celebrities in their identities.
question
            Commercial misappropriation of a name or likeness
answer
        Some states refer to the right of publicity as this. They also provide two vehicles a plaintiff can use to protect the economic value of one's name: a common law action or a statutory remedy.
question
            Defamation
answer
        An untrue statement by one party about another to a third party.
question
            The elements for defamation
answer
        The elements for defamation are: (1) a statement about a person's reputation, honesty, or integrity that is untrue. (2) publication (accomplished when a third party hears or reads the defamatory statement); (3) a statement directed at a particular person; (4) damages that result from the statement.
question
            What element is required if the victim is a public figure?
answer
        The element of malice, which means that what was said or written was done with the knowledge that the information was false or with reckless disregard for whether it was true or not.
question
            What is the defense to defamation?
answer
        It's the truth.
question
            True/False. If the statement is true, even if it is harmful to the victim, it is the tort of defamation.
answer
        False. It would not be the tort of defamation.
question
            Slander
answer
        An oral or spoken defamation.
question
            Libel
answer
        Written (and in some cases broadcast) defamation.
question
            Absolute privilege
answer
        Complete defense against the tort of defamation, as in the speeches of members of congress on the floor and witnesses in a trial.
question
            Some statements are privileged
answer
        And this privilege provides a full or partial defense to the tort of defamation.
question
            An example of absolute privilege
answer
        Members of congress enjoy an absolute privilege when they are speaking on the floor of the Senate or the House because public policy requires a free dialogue on the issues pending in a legislative body. The same applies to a witness in court proceedings who has information to come forward and testify.
question
            Where a witness is granted immunity from prosecution testifies before a governmental agency,
answer
        the witness is entitled to immunity from defamation cases.
question
            Qualified privilege
answer
        Media privilege to print inaccurate information without liability for defamation, so long as a retraction is printed and there was no malice.
question
            Qualified privilege in the workplace
answer
        A qualified privilege to make a defamatory statement in the workplace exists when the statement is made to protect the interests of the private employer on a work related matter, especially when reporting actual or suspected wrongdoings.
question
            Slander of title
answer
        Malicious making of false statements as to a seller's title.
question
            Trade libel
answer
        Written defamation about a product of service.
question
            Product disparagement
answer
        Slander of title and trade libel are known as product disparagement which occurs when someone makes false statements about another business, is products or it's ability.
question
            The elements of product disparagement are:
answer
        (1) a false statement about a particular business product or about its service in terms of honesty, reputation, ability, or integrity; (2) communication of the statement to a third party; and (3) damages.
question
            Contract interference
answer
        Or (the tortious inference with contracts). Tort in which a third party interferes with other's freedom to contract.
question
            While the elements required to establish the tort of contract interference is complex, a basic definition is:
answer
        That the law affords a remedy when a third party intentional causes another to break a contract already in existence.
question
            Trespass
answer
        unauthorized action with respect to land or personal property.
question
            Trespass to land
answer
        Any unpermitted entry below, on, across, or above the land of another.
question
            Trespass to personal property
answer
        The invasion of personal property without permission from the owner.
question
            The first element of negligence is:
answer
        Duty.
question
            What is duty?
answer
        There is a general duty of care imposed to act as a reasonably prudent person would in similar circumstances.
question
            Malpractice
answer
        When services are not properly rendered in accordance with commonly accepted standards; negligence by a professional in performing his or her skill.
question
            To avoid liability for malpractice
answer
        A professional must perform his or her skill in the same manner, as, and at the level of, other professionals in the same field.
question
            The second element of negligence:
answer
        Breach of duty.
question
            Breach of duty
answer
        Was imposed by statute or by the application of the reasonable person standard.
question
            The third element in negligence:
answer
        Causation.
question
            Contributory negligence
answer
        Negligence of the plaintiff that contributes to injury and at common law bars from the defendant although the defendant may have been more negligent than the plaintiff.
question
            Joint and several liability
answer
        Each defendant may be held liable to pay the entire judgement.
question
            Concerning torts and crimes, choose the correct statement: a) every tort is a crime. b) every crime is a tort. c) no crime is a tort. d) a crime may also be a tort.
answer
        d) a crime may also be a tort
question
            John owed Barney money. Barney called John's home several times per day for five weeks asking for repayment, with some of the calls coming after midnight. Barney might be liable for:  a) defamation. b) wrongful interference with a contract. c) intentional inflection of emotional distress. d)trespass.
answer
        c) intentional inflection of emotional distress.
question
            Which of the following is a defense to defamation?  a) slander b) libel c) truth d) none of the above
answer
        c) truth
question
            True/False. Some individuals are not subject to tort liability for defamation.
answer
        True. Some statements are privileged; that, is there is a full or partial defense to defamation. Members of Congress, for example, when speaking on the House floor are absolutely immune from defamation so that there can be a free flow in ideas and information.
question
            True/False. Negligence can be proven without showing actual damage.
answer
        False. For a plaintiff to prevail in negligence, she must prove that she or her property was actually damaged.
question
            True/False. Truth is generally an absolute defense to defamation.
answer
        True. Truth is generally an absolute defense to defamation because the tort of defamation requires an "untrue" statement as one of the elements of the tort.
question
            True/False. Strict liability commonly arises in situations in which a statutory duty is imposed or in product liability.
answer
        True. Strict liability arises in a number of different circumstances, but the most common are in those situations in which a statutory duty is imposed and in product liability.
question
            True/False. A store owner or employee may detain a customer for a reasonable time even if the customer has not shoplifted.
answer
        True. The shopkeeper's privilege gives a store owner the right to detain a suspected shoplifter for a reasonable time if there is reasonable cause, regardless if the customer has taken anything.
question
            Slander of title and trade libel are collectively known as product __________.
answer
        Disparagement.
question
            In a claim for negligence, the plaintiff must show the defendant breached a reasonable duty of care, which is:
answer
        A reasonably prudent person, not any person.
question
            Generally, torts arise from a violation of a ________ duty.
answer
        Private. A tort arises from the violation of a private duty to our neighbor. For example, we have the private duty to tell the truth about our neighbor. Violation of that duty may give rise to the tort of defamation.
question
            Torts can be classified as:
answer
        Intentional, negligence, and strict liability. Examples include the intentional tort of defamation, negligence tort of malpractice, and the strict liability tort of product liability.
question
            To successfully defend a claim of false imprisonment, a merchant must show:
answer
        The merchant acted based on reasonable suspicion.
question
            An absolute privilege is available as a defense to slander liability when:
answer
        A witness testifies in a court proceeding.
question
            Comparative negligence:
answer
        Allows a comparison of negligence between plaintiff and defendant.
question
            A shopkeeper may lose the shopkeeper's privilege if:
answer
        The customer is kept an unreasonable amount of time.