Business Law- Mindtap Ch 6 and 7 – Flashcards

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers
question
T/F: The basic purpose of tort law is to punish criminal wrongdoers
answer
False
question
General Damages
answer
Intended to compensate individuals (but not companies) for the non-monetary aspects of the harm suffered from a tort, such as pain and suffering
question
Compensatory Damages
answer
Intended to compensate or reimburse a plaintiff for actual losses
question
Special Damages
answer
Intended to compensate the plaintiff for quantifiable monetary losses, such as medical expenses
question
Punitive Damages
answer
Awarded in tort cases to punish the wrongdoer and to deter others from similar wrongdoing
question
Two broad classifications of torts
answer
Intentional torts and unintentional torts
question
T/F: Because an intentional tort requires intent, a harmful motive is required
answer
False
question
A person who commits a tort is known as a
answer
Tortfeasor
question
Assault
answer
Any intentional and unexcused threat of immediate harmful or offensive contact
question
Battery
answer
An unexcused and harmful or offensive physical contact intentionally performed
question
Main events of Fraudulent Misrepresentation
answer
1. A misrepresentation of material facts with knowledge of their falsity 2. An intent to cause another party to rely on the misrepresentation 3. Damages suffered as a result of that reliance 4. A causal connection between the misrepresentation and the injury suffered
question
T/F: In our freely competitive economy, businesses have no limits on how they can attract customers
answer
False
question
Competing via aggressive marketing and advertising strategies is (not permissible, usually permissible) interference with a business relationship
answer
Usually permissible
question
T/F: Trespass to land has nothing to do with obtaining permission for use of the land
answer
False
question
T/F: Trespass to land requires that a person remains on the land
answer
True
question
For trespass to land to occur you have to ___ onto, above, or below the land surface owned by another
answer
enter
question
A real property owner must ___ that a person is a trespasser
answer
Establish
question
A guest in your home is (typically, typically not) a tresspasser
answer
Typically not
question
T/F: When you borrow a friend's tablet device and refuse to give it back, you have committed trespass to land
answer
False
question
Which of the following acts normally do NOT constitute a conversion? a. Temporarily borrowing a friend's textbook and then returning it. b. The taking of electronic records and data without the owner's permission. c. Mistakenly believing that you are entitled to goods that are not your own.
answer
a. Temporarily borrowing a friend's textbook and then returning it.
question
Slander of Title
answer
Publishing false information about another's legal ownership of property that results in financial loss to the property's owner
question
Disparagement of Property
answer
Occurs when economically injurious falsehoods are made about another's property or product
question
T/F: The difference between intentional torts and torts involving negligence is that, in torts involving negligence, the tortfeaser does NOT wish to bring about the consequence of the act, nor does she or he believe that they will occur.
answer
True
question
Elements required to succeed in a negligence action in the order in which they are normally consideed
answer
Duty...Breach...Causation...Damages
question
T/F: The reasonable person standard concerns itself with how a particular person would act and not with how an ordinarily prudent person should act.
answer
False
question
Those who enter retail premises are called
answer
Business invitees
question
Store owners must warn business invitees of
answer
foreseeable risks
question
A landowner has a duty to discover and remove any ___ dangers to customers or other invitees
answer
hidden
question
When risks are so ____, owners need not warn of them
answer
Obvious
question
An attorney's conduct is judged by the reasonable person standard
answer
False
question
Which of the following questions does a court NOT ask to determine whether the requirement of causation is met? a. Was there intent? b. Is there causation in fact? c. Was the act the approximate cause of the injury?
answer
a. Was there intent?
question
T/F: You accidentally bump into someone on the sidewalk and that person falls, but is unharmed. Nonetheless, that person usually can successfully sue you for damages?
answer
False
question
______ may occur if an individual violates a statute providing for a criminal penalty if that violation causes another to be harmed.
answer
Negligence per se
question
_______ statutes exist to protect, as an example, medical personnel who volunteer their services in emergency situations
answer
Good Samaritan
question
________ imposes liability on bartenders who have served too much alcohol to those who are involved in accidents after leaving the bar.
answer
Dram Shop Act
question
Assumption of risk does NOT require a. knowledge of the risk. b. seeking out the riskiest activities. c. voluntary assumption of the risk.
answer
b. seeking out the riskiest activities
question
T/F: An intervening event that acts as a superseding (overriding) cause may relieve the defendant of liability for injuries caused by the intervening event.
answer
True
question
Contributory Negligence
answer
A theory in tort law in which a complaining party's own negligence contributed to or caused his or her injuries
question
Comparative Negligence
answer
A theory in tort law under which the liability for injuries resulting from negligent acts is shared by all parties who were negligent (including the injured party), on the basis of each person's proportionate negligence
question
The state of Texas has placed caps on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice causes of action. This type of limitation on damages is a. a violation of the U.S. Constitution. b. a protected interest. c. an example of tort reform. d. always a violation of a state constitution.
answer
c. an example of tort reform.
question
Mel sent Jasper an e-mail message telling Jasper that his wife had been killed in a car accident, and Mel knew this was untrue. Jasper may be able to sue Mel for a. libel. b. battery. c. infliction of emotional distress. d. violations of the First Amendment.
answer
c. infliction of emotional distress.
question
Mark is a famous syndicated radio personality for TalkRadio. He has a distinctive voice and manner of speaking. MoreTalk hires Gordon, who sounds nearly identical to Mark, to host a competing show. MoreTalk encourages Gordon to imitate Mark as closely as possible while on the air. MoreTalk is most likely to be liable for a. conversion. b. appropriation. c. defamation. d. wrongful interference with a business relationship.
answer
b. appropriation.
question
The members of the City High soccer team have been training with Hanson, a personal trainer who charges by the hour, for several years. Bob, the soccer coach, tells the team members that they must now train with Martin, not Hanson, or they will be kicked off the team. All of Hanson's clients immediately stop training with Hanson. Bob is most likely to have committed a. no tort. b. conversion. c. slander. d. wrongful interference with a business relationship.
answer
d. wrongful interference with a business relationship.
question
Doug obtains permission to be on Nathan's land for one day to hold a four-wheeling event. Doug's truck breaks down, and instead of removing it, he leaves it on Nathan's property for several days after the event. Doug has most likely committed a. trespass, but he has a complete defense. b. trespass to personal property. c. no tort. d. trespass to land.
answer
d. trespass to land.
question
Cory opens a small jewelry store but has difficulty competing with Bling Jewels, a much larger firm. In his newspaper ad, Cory includes the false statement, "Bling Jewels sells stolen diamonds." Bling experiences an immediate decrease in sales. Cory has most likely committed the tort of a. slander of title. b. malice. c. wrongful interference with a contractual relationship. d. slander of quality.
answer
a. slander of title.
question
Baylee is driving her friend Sarah to the movies. Baylee loses control of the car and crashes into a fence. The vehicle's airbags deploy, and both Sarah and Baylee are shaken up but not physically injured. Sarah threatens to sue Baylee for negligence. Sarah's lawsuit is likely to be a. successful, because Baylee was negligent. b. unsuccessful, because Sarah was not injured. c. successful, because Baylee owed Sarah a duty of care. d. unsuccessful, because Sarah was also negligent.
answer
b. unsuccessful, because Sarah was not injured.
question
John becomes seriously ill while vacationing at a remote island resort. Dr. Smith is vacationing at the same resort. Because it is an emergency and no one else is available, the doctor treats John until he can be flown to the mainland. John's illness is outside of Dr. Smith's area of expertise, and the treatment she provides causes permanent damage to Frank. If John sues Dr. Smith, he can defend himself under a. dram shop acts. b. the "danger invites rescue" doctrine. c. Good Samaritan statutes. d. the theory of res ipsa loquitur.
answer
c. Good Samaritan statutes.
question
Andy decides to go skydiving for his 40th birthday. He signs a waiver, boards the plane and prepares for the jump. Everything is going smoothly until just before landing a down draft forces Andy down at a much faster rate into the ground, causing injury to both of his legs. Andy will likely not be able to recover for his injuries under the defense of a. negligence per se. b. transferred intent. c. assumption of the risk. d. consent.
answer
c. assumption of the risk.
question
Bob was staying at a hotel owned by the Resort Hotels. While a hotel employee was removing luggage from the back seat of Bob's car, Bob reached into the front seat to get his briefcase. He supported himself by placing his left hand on the center pillar to which the rear door was hinged. The hotel employee closed the rear door, and a part of Bob's left index finger was amputated. Bob filed a negligence lawsuit against the hotel in a state that adopted a "pure" form of comparative negligence. The court probably found that a. Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned his damages. b. Bob contributed to his injury and awarded him nothing in damages. c. Bob did not contribute to his injury and apportioned his damages. d. Bob did not contribute to his injury and awarded him full damages.
answer
a. Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned his damages.
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New