The duty of care standard for an Attorney is the reasonable Attorney standard, not the reasonable person standard.

True. Professionals owe a higher duty of care based on special education, skill or intelligence. The standard is what a reasonable person in that profession would do (exs: physician, attorney, CPA). More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/badm-300-test-2/

Reasonable person standard of care

A minimum standard that requires an individual to act as a responsibly prudent person. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/sports-injury-management-sg/

Home Page Law Civil Law Reasonable Person Standard

Reasonable Person Standard Flashcards, test questions and answers

Discover flashcards, test exam answers, and assignments to help you learn more about Reasonable Person Standard and other subjects. Don’t miss the chance to use them for more effective college education. Use our database of questions and answers on Reasonable Person Standard and get quick solutions for your test.

What is Reasonable Person Standard?

The reasonable person standard is a legal concept that is often used to determine an individual’s liability in court. It is based on the notion that an ordinarily prudent and rational person would act with a certain level of care in any given situation. This standard can be applied in various areas of law, including negligence, intentional torts, and criminal law.In negligence cases, the reasonable person standard helps to define what constitutes an acceptable level of care in a particular situation. The court may consider factors such as age, experience, intelligence level, and special circumstances when determining how a reasonable person would have acted in similar circumstances. For example, if two people are in a car accident due to one driver’s careless behavior, the court may consider whether or not the other driver behaved reasonably under the circumstances to determine their degree of fault for the accident.In intentional torts cases such as battery or assault, courts may look to the reasonable person standard to define what actions constitute illegal force against another individual. In these cases it could be determined that any action beyond what a reasonably prudent person would do could be considered excessive force and thereby considered tortious behavior.Finally, criminal law also makes use of the reasonable person standard when determining whether or not an individual has committed a crime (e.g., manslaughter). Here it is used to decide whether or not someone’s actions were so far outside of what most people deem acceptable behavior that they should face criminal charges for their conduct.