Business Ethics Study Review

question

What is business ethics?
answer

Business ethics is a branch of applied ethics, which applies normative theories to specific problems. More specifically, it is the study of business situations, activities, and decisions where issues of right and wrong are addressed.
question

Why is it important?
answer

It helps make ethically correct decisions in the business world for right and wrong scenarios.
question

What is meta-ethics?
answer

Explores conceptual and foundational issues in morality.
question

What is normative ethics?
answer

Is the study of which principles determine the moral permissibility of an action, or, more simply what constitutes right and wrong.
question

What is applied ethics?
answer

Branch of ethics that considers the practical application of ethical principles to specific issues of social or personal concern
question

What is descriptive ethics?
answer

The study of how ethical decisions are actually made, what influences the process and outcomes of those decisions, in other words, what we actually do.
question

Explain the difference between an explanation and a justification
answer

A justification is what we should do, or in other words the study of what is right or wrong (normative ethics). An explanation is what we actually do, or in other words the ethical decisions that were actually made and what influenced that (descriptive ethics).
question

Explain the relationship between morale, ethics, and ethical theory.
answer

Ethics rationalizes morality to produce ethical theories that can be applied to any situation.
question

Explain the difference between ethics and prudence. What is the common perception of the relation between ethics in prudence in business?
answer

Ethics help determine what is right and wrong, this tends to be rational, impartial and universalizable. Prudence helps determine what is one’s self interests; the rules of prudence tend to be partial. A common perception is that ethics and prudence tend to coincide within a business, it usually in ones best interest to act morally.
question

What is legal positivism?
answer

Legal positivism is the view that the scope of ethics and the law is co- extensive. What is legal is ethical and what is illegal is unethical.
question

What is the relationship between business ethics and the law?
answer

Business ethics are found in the law but are in an analyzed form, they are not simply seen as laws pertaining to business ethics. ****
question

Critically evaluate the proposition that concerns about business ethics can be eliminated by reducing ethical problems to legal questions.
answer

This cannot work due to the fact that legal positivism is false. If ethical problems were reduced to legal solutions, this would suggest that all legal solutions are true and ethical. This reduction is false because this suggestion is false, not all legal solutions are true or ethical.
question

Critically evaluate the claim that business ethics is an oxymoron
answer

There are three main criticisms over the claim that business ethics is an oxymoron. a) B.E. is useless – individuals are capable of changing moral beliefs there for it is useful. b) B.E. is indeterminate – this claim does not hold because all fields disagree over their principles (economics, politics, science etc.) c) B.E. is irrelevant – this claim does not hold because not everyone knows what the right thing to do is.
question

If business ethics is not an oxymoron, then is it necessarily true of any business regardless of the industry it is in? Is it possible to conceive of an ethical land mine manufacturer, an ethical manufacturer of illegal drugs, or an ethical animal testing laboratory?
answer

The following examples are examples giving of unethical behaviors but not of business ethics. Business ethics is used to determine what is right or wrong in business so the concluding examples do not adequately follow the premise.
question

What is a normative factor?
answer

?
question

What is virtue ethics?
answer

Any theory that sees the primary focus of ethics to be the character of the person rather than that person’s actions or duties
question

Give an example of an ethical situation in business that might be favorably resolved by virtue ethics?
answer

When assessing the role of human resources in a business, determining conflictions between people may be preferably resolved bye virtue ethics as it deals with character rather than actions.
question

What is consequentialism?
answer

An action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable.
question

What is deontology?
answer

The ethical study of duties, obligations, and rights, with an approach focusing on the rightness or wrongness of actions themselves and not on the goodness or badness of the consequences of those actions.
question

Give an example of an ethical situation in business that might be favorably resolved by deontology?
answer

Firing a highly skilled salesman because he violated a rule despite the potential success he may bring to the firm. His actions caused this decision and the future outcome of his skills was non-determinant in the decision-making.
question

What is act-utilitarianism? What is rule-utilitarianism
answer

Act – Looks to single actions and bases the moral judgment on the amount of pleasure and the amount of pain this single action causes. Rule – looks at classes of action and ask whether the underlying principles of an action produce more pleasure than pain for society in the long run.
question

22. Give an example of an ethical situation in business that might be favorably resolved by utilitarianism?
answer

If there is a common flu going around your office and you decide to give everyone the day off to rest. This does more good for the most amounts of people.
question

23. Raise one objection to utilitarianism. How could a utilitarian respond to the objection?
answer

Utilitarianism leads one to sometimes make a decision that is morally wrong with the justification that the outcome is less morally wrong. A utilitarian would respond bye saying that despite that morally wrong decision, when weighing out the outcomes, your decision did more good.
question

24. What is Kantian deontology? What are its key insights?
answer

Kantian deontology is the notion that one should act from the good will. This means that one should do good things for the right reasons. He believes we should treat all agents with respect.
question

25. Why does Kant believe human beings are worthy of respect?
answer

He believes that the goodwill is the only thing that is good in itself because it is the only thing truly in ones control and it is what enables us to do the right thing for the right reasons. Therefore he believes the goodwill deserves respect and we should therefore respect others.
question

26. What are the first and second categorical imperatives?
answer

The categorical imperatives are a set of guidelines to help understand whether actions come from the goodwill or not. a) Consistency – can this action become a universal law? b) Human dignity – states you should act so you treat humanity, whether yourself or another always as an end and never as a means only.
question

27. What is a maxim?
answer

A maxim is statement or sub point that helps organize the categorical imperative.
question

28. Describe the steps in the Kantian decision procedure?
answer

Form a maxim, evaluate whether it comes from the goodwill or not (is it the right action? Is it done for the right reasons?). If it comes from the goodwill it is permissible and you are praiseworthy. If it does not come from the goodwill but is consistent with it, it is permissible but you are not praiseworthy.
question

29. What is the point of the shopkeeper example?
answer

It shows that one action may have three different roots within it, only one being from the goodwill.
question

30. Raise an objection to Kantian deontology. How might Kant respond?
answer

An objection to Kantian deontology is that it does not put enough emphasis on the results or the consequences of the actions. Kant would respond by saying that all actions are justified if they are made from the goodwill.
question

31. Would you pull the switch in the trolley case? Why or why not?
answer

I would not pull the switch in the trolley case. I would not pull it because regardless of the utilitarian outcome of pulling the switch or the fact that it came from goodwill, it still holds me accountable for the death of one person. I would rather not be put in the equation.
question

32. Describe the pluralistic perspective in moral theory adopted in the course?
answer

The pluralistic perspective explains that there are more than one normative consideration when trying to solve an ethical dilemma. This is the one of the root causes of ethical discussion.
question

33. How can we make progress in moral disagreements?
answer

In order to progress in moral disagreements we must obtain objective information, strive for definitional clarity, study cases and analyze arguments and positions.
question

34. Would you push the man from the bridge in the trolley case? Why or why not?
answer

I would not push the man from the bridge because I would not want to be help accountable for the death of human despite the results or the intentions of my actions.
question

35. What is the difference between permissibility and praiseworthiness?
answer

Permissible means that an action is consistent with the goodwill while praiseworthy means the actions come from the goodwill.
question

36. What is moral absolutism?
answer

There are eternal, universally applicable moral principles and right and wrong are objective and can be rationally determined.
question

37. What is moral relativism?
answer

Morality is context- dependent and subjective and right and wrong are subjective and cannot be rationally determined.
question

38. Critically evaluate the proposition that answers to ethical questions are relative to culture or to an individual’s personal opinion.
answer

Not all morality is found within cultural norms and prudence, morality can be found outside of these two things showing that not all answers to ethical questions are found this way.
question

39. What is the basic principle of the ethics of care?
answer

The basic principles of ethics of care are: Care requires that one take concrete action to look after the needs of others and to foster good relationships. Care is a general disposition to behave in a particular way, a meta-virtue that organizes all the other virtues.
question

40. Briefly, what is the stockholder theory of the purpose of the corporation?
answer

The stockholder theory explains that a corporation’s goal is to maximize the bottom line while operating within the rules of the game.
question

41. According to Freidman’s view of stockholder theory, what is the role of ethics in business?
answer

As long as ethics does not interfere with the maximizing of the bottom line it is accepted, however, if a ethical arguments interfere with the bottom line or use the resources of the company for ethical advancements, it is disallowed.
question

42. Outline one of the arguments that Friedman gives in favor of the stockholder theory?
answer

Friedman explains that managers have a fiduciary responsibility to act solely in the interest of the stockholders. If they begin acting from self-interests, it goes on to complicate operations and could affect the bottom line, which in turn will affect management.
question

43. What is externality?
answer

Are outside contractual relationships.
question

44. What is a public good?
answer

A commodity or service that is provided without profit to society usually bye an organization.
question

45. According to the narrow view of shareholder theory, who are the shareholders in a company?
answer

Shareholders are those who have equity or some sort of finance in a firm.
question

46. What do the shareholder and stakeholder views have in common?
answer

They both see the firm as central and that management has a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders.
question

47. What is a deductive argument?
answer

An argument that attempts to demonstrate with certainty that its conclusion is true
question

48. What is an inductive argument?
answer

An argument that attempts to demonstrate with probability that its conclusion is true.
question

49. What is a valid argument?
answer

A valid argument is one that it is impossible for its premises to be true and its conclusion to be false.
question

50. What is a sound argument?
answer

A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises.
question

51. How are virtue ethics relevant to business?
answer

They are relevant when assessing a business situation from a personal standpoint. It helps determine the characters of the individuals involved.
question

52. Describe the four requirements of the ethics of care.
answer

Moral Attention, Sympathetic Understanding, Relationship Awareness, Accommodation and Harmony
question

53. What are the business implications of Buddhist ethics?
answer

Buddhist ethics provides an alternative approach to ethical management. It provides insight on how to govern a firm while adapting Buddhist ethics. Taking on the four noble truths and the notion of not harming others.
question

54. What is an ethical decision? Describe at least three features that ethical decisions share?
answer

An ethical decision is a decision that takes ethics into consideration. Recognizing a moral issue, making moral judgment, establishing a moral intent and engaging in moral behavior.
question

55. Distinguish between individual and situational factors that influence ethical decision-making.
answer

Individual factors affect all of the steps when making an ethical decision while situational factors only affect the first three steps.
question

56. What is moral intensity and what factors influence its magnitude?
answer

Moral intensity is how important you feel a more problem is. The consequences of an action will determine the magnitude of this intensity.
question

57. What is moral framing?
answer

How people perceive a problem will change their feelings on the dilemma. Language is a big aspect of moral framing.
question

58. What is moral muteness?
answer

When people don’t talk about problems because they don’t want to cause issues.
question

59. How does authority influence ethical decision-making?
answer

People respond very highly to figures of authority and people will abide bye authority regardless of the moral level of the demand.
question

60. How do work roles and organizational cultures influence ethical decision-making?
answer

Your role in work can go on to affect your judgment of what is ethical and what isn’t because you are focusing on your role versus the bigger picture. Organization culture has a similar affect and they as well influence how you respond to ethical situations.
question

61. Explain how criminologists approach the problem or moral motivation?
answer

Criminologists see moral motivation as not something found in the actions of these people but rather why they are not motivated to abide by morally correct behavior.
question

62. According to Heath which three theories fail to explain moral motivation and why?
answer

Three theories that criminologists have used to explain the lack of moral motivation are: character, greed and poor values. These failed to give answers because they overgeneralized, don’t explain corporate crime and does ignores criminals acceptance of other values.
question

63. Explain how neutralization techniques embedded in corporate cultures can influence ethical decision-making.
answer

Neutralization techniques try and rationalize actions in a way that makes their actions seem harmful which then goes on to influence ethical decision-making bye making one believe that the actions committed could possibly be ethical.
question

64. Based on what we know concerning the individual and situational influences on ethical decision-making, case studies can sometimes identify points for managing and improving the ethical decision-making of a firm. In a given case, what policies and programs would you put in place? Why?
answer

???
question

65. What is the difference between business reasons and moral reasons?
answer

This question is being asked in regards to a bigger question of why should business care about ethics. From a business standpoint, a lot of the people associated with the business care about ethics, whether it is customers, employees or investors. In regards to morality, business have a moral obligation as their actions have either positive or negative moral consequences as a corporation as seen as its own entity.
question

66. What is enlightened self-interest?
answer

Enlightened self-interest is more or less the same thing as the business approach to why business should care about ethics. Within them there are interests that make up the bigger scope of the business interests.
question

67. What is a fiduciary responsibility?
answer

Is seen as a binding contract that states one group should act in the best interest and considerations of another.
question

68. In what sense are the definitions of corporate social responsibility examined “functionalist” definitions?
answer

They are examined in order to understand if a firm defines its CSR closely to how a firm defines it. Is there continuity between the principles of the firm and its ethical part.
question

69. What is the stockholder view of CSR? Provide two arguments to support this view, one based on the right to property, the other on utilitarian considerations. What objections might we raise to this view?
answer

He argues that since managers have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders, they are not aloud to use the shareholders resources for reasons outside of making profit. He also would argue that generating the greatest bottom line does the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people. We would object bye saying that doing something is ethical correct that may go outside of generating profits could provide more good for more people than just good profits.
question

70. What is the stakeholder view on CSR?
answer

The stakeholder view sees that managers have a fiduciary responsibility to all stakeholders associated with the firm, that is all those that have a stake in the firm.
question

71. What is the principle of corporate rights? What is the principle of corporate effects?
answer

The principle of corporate rights states that a corporation has the obligation not to violate the rights of others. The principle of corporate effect states that a corporation is responsible for the effect of their actions on others.
question

72. What is a stakeholder? On the limited view of CSR, who are the basic stakeholders?
answer

A stakeholder is anyone who has a stake in the firm. The basic stakeholders are stockholders, employees, consumers, suppliers, local communities and managers.
question

73. What is the extended or network view of CSR? What moral intuition does it capture?
answer

This view assumes that all stakeholder have stakeholders associated with themselves which creates a chain of responsibilities and he effects of a firm have a moral effect on a chain of people. ‘
question

74. Distinguish between normative and instrumental stakeholder theory
answer

The normative stakeholder theory is the notion of taking into consideration the interests of all stakeholders while the instrumental stakeholder theory is the managerial aspect of going through with it.
question

75. Raise objections to the stakeholder view of CSR. How might stakeholder theorists respond?
answer

The stakeholder theory, although provides the right moral outlook, does not take into consideration the difficulty and confusion of actually going through with it, form a managerial perspective. A stakeholder theorist would say that despite the confusion it may cause, it is necessary to achieve the right level of morality in regards to corporate governance.
question

76. What conclusion can we draw from the disagreement over CSR?
answer

We can conclude that the discussion of corporate governance is heavily controversial with many forms of corporate governance available, an ethically achievable governance format will possibly be available in the near future.
question

77. Describe the four-part model of CSR deployed in practice.
answer

Corporate social responsibility includes the economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic expectations placed on organizations by society at a given point in time.
question

78. What are the four typical corporate CSR strategies to deal with ethical criticism?
answer

The four strategies are reaction, defense, accommodation and pro-action.
question

79. Describe three concrete areas that we can examine to measure corporate social performance?
answer

Three concrete ways to measure CSR are social policies, social programs and social impacts.
question

80. What is deterriorialization?
answer

It is a word that used to describe the actions of globalization. It means process, which diminishes the necessity of a common and shared territorial basis for social, economic, and political activities, processes, and relations.
question

81. Why is globalization relevant to business ethics? What is the impact of globalization on different stakeholders?
answer

Globalization is relevant to business ethics because it creates cultural conflicts, it affects legal jurisdiction and it creates confusion among accountability with issues. Stockholders have greater risk and rewards, employees lose jobs locally create new ones globally, consumers get products for cheaper, suppliers are global etc.
question

82. Describe Donaldson’s 3 principles of cross-cultural ethical management. How do we apply them in practice?
answer

Donaldson’s 3 principles are: a) Respecting core human values b) Respecting local traditions c) Context matters when deciding right or wrong In practice, corporations must make these principles absolute, they must consult with host country and try and minimize pollution.
question

83. Why does Maitland describe discussion over international sweatshops as a “non-debate”? Why is it important to debate a seemingly accepted moral position?
answer

He sees it, as a non-debate because he does not believe changing the current position of sweatshops will further anything as evidence show rising wages will result in consequences. It is important to further debate this for the sake of future breakthroughs and innovations.
question

84. Distinguish three host country wage standards: the living wage, the moral minimum, and the classic liberal standard.
answer

The living wage allows one to live life with dignity, the moral minimum would be acceptable under development conditions and the classical liberal standard is freely chosen by informed workers.
question

85. Describe the case against sweatshops. How does Maitland respond to these objections? What does he conclude? How can we respond to his conclusions?
answer

The case against sweatshops is that they offer poor wages, creates inequalities and political repression. Maitland would say that wages are just as good as local jobs; the long-term affect of inequality is non-existent and high unemployment rate is bad for government. He concludes that raising wages for these employees would result in tragic consequences and he suggests endorsing a free market approach to wages. Our response would suggest that a short term rising of wages would serve beneficial as a test and free market approach to wages would result in MNC taking advantage of such rules.
question

86. Define sustainability. What is the triple bottom line?
answer

Sustainability refers to the long-term maintenance of systems according to environmental, economic and social considerations. The triple bottom line is comprised of economic, social and environmental aspects.
question

87. Describe the business case for the conclusion that sustainability can be profitable.
answer

The CEO of a company decided to reduce its consumption and minimize its environmental footprint with the intentions of taking a moral stance but this ended up becoming profitable. As we can see that becoming sustainable nowadays can become a profitable venture.
question

88. What are some objections to the use of cost-benefit analysis in environmental ethics? How might a proponent of CBA respond?
answer

Human decision-making involves more than just weighing costs and benefits, as well the notion of a cost and a benefit is subjective. They would respond bye saying there is not true alternative to this method. Need more****
question

89. Why might the term human resources be problematic?
answer

This term may be problematic because it is viewing humans as a means to an end as Kant would put it rather than people.
question

90. Think about what it means to talk about employees in terms of human resources. Compare Kant’s theory with the feminist approach to business ethics in relation to human resource management. Do you think the term is adequately chosen? What are the implications of this terminology from both perspectives?
answer

Kant would argue that the term human resources make people seem as a means to end rather than viewing them as people. The feminist approach would argue that we need to treat people with a matter of care, similar to the ethics of care approach. I do not think the term is adequately chosen but I do not believe it has a significant enough meaning that people outside the philosophical circle would address as an issue.
question

91. What is human right? Describe some rights and duties of employees as stakeholders.
answer

A human right is something that is commonly understood as inalienable fundamental right to which a person is entitled too simply because he or she is a human being. Stakeholders are giving both rights and duties as employees: Right – freedom from discrimination, privacy, healthy and safe working conditions, freedom of speech, fair wages and the right to work. Duties – duty to comply with labor contract, duty to comply with the law and duty to respect employer’s property.
question

92. How might we justify the freedom of speech, conscience and action from a utilitarian perspective? How might we do so from a Kantian perspective?
answer

Freedom of speech from a utilitarian perspective allows one to express possible adversity that will resolve issues for greater amounts of people; an example is martin Luther king Jr for the black community. This can also be seen similarly in the Kantian perspective as freedom of speech allows one to speak up against employers that use employees as means to and end.
question

93. What is whistleblowing and why is it normally considered an ethical issue?
answer

Whistleblowing is the exposure of wrongdoing in an organization. It is considered an ethical issue because an employee has a duty as well a fiduciary responsibility to its employer and whistleblowing goes against that contract.
question

94. What common defense of whistleblowing does Davis describe and why does he believe that it fails? What alternative does he provide?
answer

????
question

95. What reason do we have to believe that common approaches to whistleblowing are misguided?
answer

We believe that whistleblowing is something wrong so we try and justify why we must do it but in reality it showed be the other way around. It is perceived this way because an employee has an obligation of loyalty to its employer. The reasons are: a) Loyalty can be applied only in a stable relationship of trust and confidence, one that transcends self-interest b) The relationship of an employee to the corporation is merely a relationship of mutual self-interest c) The employee has no duty of loyalty to the employer d) Whistle blowing needs no special defense beyond one that satisfies the minimal requirement of loyalty based in law.
question

96. Make three ethical arguments from different normative perspectives for the presumptive wrongness of lying?
answer

Aristotle – Tell the truth so you can build a truthful character so when a situation of importance arises you are not tempted to lie Kant – Never lie, it is always wrong and therefor it should never be done. Lying breaks down society. Mill – Lying is determined consequently, the outcomes of lie determine whether it be right or wrong. If it creates the greatest outcome for the greatest among of people than lie, if not then don’t.
question

97. What analogy does Albert Carr draw? What is the point of his argument?
answer

Albert Carr draws on the analogy that business bluffing is similar to poker. You are expecting that everyone is bluffing as a lot is at stake, if you do not bluff than you will lose. Because everyone is bluffing and it is expected for you to lie than it is permissible.
question

98. How does one test an argument by analogy?
answer

In order to test an argument by analogy you must compare the principles shared by the analogy and the argument. This comparison must be reflective in the thesis and argument for it to be a valid analogy. A has properties X, Y and Z. B has properties X and Y therefore it must also have Z.
question

99. Why is it problematic for businesses to argue that ethics should be reduced to the law (i.e. “all we have to do is follow the law” or “we don’t make the law, we just follow it?)?
answer

This is problematic due to legal positivism. Not all that is legal is ethical and not all that is ethical is legal.
question

100. Describe and assess Carson’s case for bluffing. What is he trying to accomplish? Are you convinced? Why or why not?
answer

Carson posses the question: is your false statement in a bargaining situation considered unethical? Two statements help answer this question: One – These sorts of statements are not considered lying in this society. This creates a new definition of lying. A lies to B, only if A has made a false statement which he does not believe to be true warranting the truth of the statement for B. Two – it can be deemed permissible because you are under the impression that your negotiation partner is doing the same. This is Prima Facie wrong. Prima Facie – Based on the first impression; accepted as correct until proved otherwise

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member