Alicia Martinez Murder Essay
Alicia Martinez slaying: Did Edward Romero chop up some organic structure parts in a liquidizer? Denver Westword. Thursday. Mar. 8 2012 Alicia Martinez disappeared on October 24. 2010. and shortly thenceforth. Denver Police arrested Edward Romero for first degree slaying. Harmonizing to constabulary Romero allegedly killed Martinez by hiting her twice in the caput. so dismembering her organic structure even traveling so far as to set some little pieces in a liquidizer. Some parts were ne’er found and others losing tegument. Martinez was finally identified through the usage of alveolar consonant records.
Francesca Pagliasotti. Romero’s girlfriend was accused of being an accoutrement to first-degree slaying. Pagliasotti wasn’t place when Romero allegedly killed Martinez. but upon her reaching. she found him in the garage. chopping up the girls’ organic structure. The forenoon after. Pagliasotti. who has two little kids with Romero. got out a swab and a pail and started cleaning up Martinez’s blood. ( Roberts. 2012 ) The actus reus or condemnable act of this offense has to be Romero hiting Martinez twice in the caput and slaying her. Romero must hold had a ground. in his head. to kill Martinez.
Possibly she saw him make something or he sexually assaulted her and didn’t want any informants. Either manner the act of killing her was the actus reus. After Romero shot her and realized what he had done was non merely incorrect but could set down him in prison for the remainder of his life. he had to dispose of the organic structure. No organic structure. no offense. Romero decides the best class of action is to dismember the organic structure in the garage. Not merely dismember the organic structure but put some smaller pieces in a liquidizer. Romero had the cognition that he had committed a offense or work forces rea. Romero’s girlfriend Pagliasotta caught him in the act of dismembering a human organic structure in his garage.
Clearly what he had done in killing the miss and what he was making with acquiring rid of the organic structure was illegal. Yet Pagliasotta did non name the constabulary or tally and acquire aid. She alternatively helps Romero clean up the offense scene and act like nil happened. Pagliasotta has knowledge or work forces rea of the offense. After holding cognition of the offense she did non describe the offense to the governments. this is actus reus or the condemnable act. If Romero would hold shot the victim and non hold known that it would harm her so there would hold non been a offense.
There has to be the concurrency of actus reus and work forces rea together for a offense to happen. The fact that he knew he was aching Martinez when he shot her is the concurrency and finally the offense. Romero’s girlfriend knew that he had committed a offense. She knew that he had killed person and that he had dismembered a organic structure to seek to cover up a offense scene. Pagliasotta wittingly helped him cover up that offense scene without alarming the governments. This is the concurrency and finally her offense. This is why she is accused of accoutrement to first-degree slaying ( Roberts. 2012 ) .