Fracking: Water Supply Network and Hydraulic Fracturing Essay Example

explores the adverse effects of fracking on both the environment and human health. He argues that extracting shale gas, which is associated with seismic activity, through fracking can pose a threat to our environment by potentially causing earthquakes that could damage land. Additionally, The Economist reported in November 2011 that fifty minor earthquakes in north-west England were linked to fracking (Wellin 90). Therefore, addressing this issue is imperative as it jeopardizes not only our water and air quality but also puts our environment at risk.

Engaging in drilling and fracking activities within the United States may endanger our citizens through induced earthquakes, polluted air and water sources that can lead to various illnesses. While it is argued that these practices are crucial for enhancing our oil reserves, they also pose a significant danger to our ecosystem.

The already fragile environment of Quiap 3 faces a grave threat from fracking, which has been linked to polluted drinking water and air contamination. The movie 'Gasland' by Josh Fox provides a vivid depiction of the harmful impact that fracking could have on both the local community and the environment. According to Fox, he was offered $100,000 by a natural gas firm to permit drilling on his family's land in Milanville, Pennsylvania; however, Energy in Depth disputes this claim and vehemently denies offering or paying Fox any amount of $100,000.

Fox's documentary explored the effects of natural gas drilling in various Western states, including Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and Texas. Residents reported chronic health issues due to air and water contamination from fracking. The film had a significant impact on viewers, highlighting the real-life consequences of this industry on nearby communities.

The

environmental impact of fracking extends beyond the immediate area and affects other aspects such as water supply. In "Gasland", gas leakage from fracking has caused people to light their faucets on fire, highlighting the dangers posed by this practice. Fox's film presents compelling evidence demonstrating the unsafety of fracking and argues against its use in the United States. Through tested evidence and firsthand accounts from those affected by fracking, the film is both well-organized and credible.

Although hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) is promoted as a safe procedure, it presents substantial hazards such as heightened emissions, earthquakes, undisclosed chemicals, and significant water depletion. These unfavorable outcomes surpass any apparent advantages. Furthermore, fracking endangers surrounding communities due to the possibility of earthquakes and contamination of their drinking water sources from leaked chemicals. It is regrettable that many individuals were misled into assuming that fracking was harmless when they were in reality deceived.

The New York Times reported in 2009 that well water has been associated with various health issues and frequent violations of environmental laws. The article by Charles Duhigg highlighted a severe case where a family refrained from showering at home due to concerns about their children's health, as they were experiencing skin irritations and other illnesses. The piece also documented numerous unpenalized violations.

The company's main focus was exploiting natural gas for financial gain instead of improving the environment and promoting its use for a healthier planet. This selfish attitude disregards those who struggle financially and have no voice in society. Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, should be banned as it only benefits individuals accumulating vast fortunes at the expense of others. Despite the severe dangers posed by fracking,

it has not been discontinued due to some major water polluters being exempt from the Clean Water Act. The Supreme Court failed to clarify which waterways fall under this act, allowing businesses to claim they are no longer subject to it - as revealed by Charles Duhigg in an article that prompted this pondering.

Pollution rates are increasing and the Clean Quiap 5 Water Act aimed to control harmful water pollution by regulating major polluters. However, according to midlevel officials, up to half of the nation's largest known polluters may not be prosecuted due to lack of jurisdiction or difficulties in proving jurisdiction. It is vital to be aware of the detrimental effects of fracking highlighted in sources such as gasland by Josh Fox and an article released by the New York Times in 2009 by Charles Duhigg as many people are not aware of the damage it can cause to our present and future lives.

Both sources utilize language that is informative, persuasive, and creates a sense of urgency. This language leads me to believe that fracking is not a beneficial practice for our nation, and I feel anxious and sad when reading personal accounts of the negative effects on individuals, especially young children. On the other hand, Kevin Hassett's article highlights the positive aspects of hydraulic fracking, such as job creation and improved economy. Hassett argues that fracking is a safe practice with numerous benefits.

The author contends that natural gas from fracking is a cleaner energy source compared to coal and oil in the US, although it is more expensive than coal but less costly than oil. The essay, however, displays a biased

view as it only presents the positive aspects of fracking while ignoring its potential chemical effects. The lack of organization and evidence to support the author's opinion makes the essay unconvincing. Instead of discussing the specific chemicals used in fracking, the author compares it to other energy sources with worse impacts and only highlights its advantages. The essay also lacks testimonials and research to verify its safety. In contrast, Fox Film's composition is better structured.

According to multiple accounts from Fox films, fracking has caused negative experiences and there is evidence proving that it is unsafe for the environment and population. Despite some arguments in favor of its benefits, I believe that fracking poses a greater threat due to water contamination and environmental damage, leading several countries to ban the practice. Therefore, if America wants to be perceived as civilized, it should also ban fracking.

The author of http://frack.mixplex.com/biblio/author/191 argues that hydraulic fracturing should be stopped due to its harmful consequences, which could impact both present and future generations.