Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place Analysis Essay Example

possible that they twisted facts to portray innocence. Additionally, if the report was confidential, it's unclear why it is now public. Perhaps it was intentionally leaked to create an impression that Germans were being informed truthfully about events as they unfolded; a secret document solely meant for German government officials would make lying difficult.

Source A appears to be reliable as it provides a personal perspective, including the author's views and opinions. This may be viewed positively or negatively depending on the reader's preferences. While some may prefer only factual information, others may appreciate the additional insights provided by the author's opinions.

According to the source, Hesse witnessed Goebbels and Hitler discussing the planned attack on Jews by the SA that night. The reliability of the source is strengthened by specific details provided in Source A, which describes Hitler's excitement at hearing of the plan. This information would be valuable to historians if the source is deemed trustworthy. It is speculated that Goebbels devised the plan to regain favor with Hitler, as he was currently experiencing a decline in status due to an extramarital affair with a Czech actress.

According to Hitler, there were inferior races. Source B supports the idea that Kristallnacht was premeditated by Goebbels and the SA. The source places responsibility for the violence against Jews on the German people, describing it as a sudden occurrence. Additionally, the source confirms that while the Nazis did not plan the attacks, they would not intervene if they began. The credibility of the source increases when Goebbels presents factual information from the night of the attacks, portraying the Nazis as innocent planners.

A historian would find

the factual information valuable in identifying the extent of the damage caused. Additionally, it helps to establish the official Nazi stance, which denied any involvement in initiating or containing the riots. However, despite a few points of similarity, the sources reveal significant differences. One commonality is that both sources agree on the time and location of the attacks, which occurred during a dinner.

According to both sources, Goebbels and Hitler were present. They also reported planned or carried out attacks on synagogues and Jewish businesses. The timeline of the sources differ, with Source A occurring before the attacks and Source B following them. Another point of similarity is Hitler's agreement with Goebbels' recommendations, despite the latter's disfavour. Additionally, both sources indicate Hitler's positive sentiment towards the acts of aggression against Jewish individuals.

For historians, having two conflicting sources stating the same information makes it more likely to be true. In regards to the attack on Jews during Kristallnacht, source A indicates that Goebbels and the SA arranged the attacks while source B claims it was a spontaneous event. The historian can use both sources as their agreement strengthens the validity of the information presented. However, source A is deemed more useful as it appears more credible and trustworthy.

According to the content, source A is deemed more useful as it provides additional details and factual information.