The Ethics of Human Cloning Essay Example

it goes against the natural creation of human beings and instead tries to manufacture them. Initially, cloning was experimented on animals resulting in a few successes but many deaths (MacKinnon, 2000). Based on the results of these animal experiments, it is likely that human cloning would have similarly high risks. As a result, those against human cloning argue that it is immoral and should be eliminated whenever possible due to these clear reasons.

Initially, the process of cloning was experimented with various mammals and yielded almost unsuccessful results. However, this method tries to equate humans with animals, consequently diminishing their inherent dignity and unique divine origination. Conversely, therapeutic cloning aids in scientific research endeavors that focus on discovering remedies for ailments that afflict humanity (Waters & Turner, 2003). Hence, proponents argue that specific types of cloning, like therapeutic cloning, should be permitted.

The supporters of therapeutic cloning argue that allowing scientists to research on various diseases through this process can potentially lead to finding cures for these diseases. They believe that therapeutic cloning offers solutions to medical issues and should be permitted without any obstacles. However, critics hold the belief that cloning is inherently evil, regardless of the type and supposed benefits. Therapeutic cloning involves obtaining stem cells from an embryo, which results in the death of the embryo. This deliberate destruction of human life is vehemently opposed by those who view cloning as equivalent to abortion and detrimental to the human race (Waters & Turner).

According to opponents of therapeutic cloning, the technology transforms from a beneficial tool into a destructive force against humanity and its dignity. As a result, those who oppose therapeutic cloning argue

that it should never be permitted under any circumstances. This opposition can also be seen as a form of hidden discrimination, as those conducting the cloning may have a negative perspective towards the individuals they use for their experiments, failing to recognize their worth as human beings.

According to opponents of cloning, cloners are indirectly responsible for killing, which is why they believe that therapeutic cloning is immoral. The successful cloning of a sheep led to attempts to clone humans, which frightened people and convinced them that human cloning was inevitable. Despite opposition from political and religious leaders, it is likely that cloning will eventually be practiced. During the cloning process, eggs lose necessary proteins for the embryo's development.

Some individuals argue that cloning humans may not be possible due to a high mortality rate linked with the procedure. Supporters of this belief strongly oppose cloning, asserting that persisting with this unsuccessful process would lead to further fatalities.

Opponents argue that human cloning is deemed unethical, immoral, and perilous, irrespective of the clone's type or the outcome of attempts (Alonso, 1999). This perspective is primarily supported by the religious community, specifically the Roman Catholic Church. They contend that generating a human being through any method other than natural procreation, which God has facilitated, is ethically unjust. They vigorously advocate for its elimination and urge individuals who cherish human life to steer clear of it without exception.

The church believes that couples who cannot have children can consider alternative methods like child adoption, but cloning is not an acceptable option. One of the reasons for this stance is that cloning undermines human dignity and disregards the value of life. Additionally,

cloning violates the law by endangering the embryo's life and contradicting the right to life for people of all ages and races (Lester ; Hefley).

Cloning is a dangerous and unlawful practice that should be prohibited in any country that upholds the rule of law. This stance is crucial for opponents as it strengthens their argument against proponents. After evaluating various positions on cloning, I firmly believe that cloning is both immoral and unethical, rendering it illegal. I will substantiate this viewpoint by acknowledging that humans are co-creators but must adhere to the prescribed method for carrying out their role in continuing creation.

God's plan did not include cloning babies; it was intended for humans to reproduce naturally. Consequently, cloning contradicts God's plan. Moreover, the procedure is both costly and time-consuming, demanding substantial financial resources while producing results that fail to justify the investment.

Moreover, cloning provides limited support for couples unable to conceive due to its low rate of success. When confronted with different instances of need, it becomes clear that cloning is not the answer. The low likelihood of a successful cloning attempt shows that this method does more harm than good. By requiring the destruction of embryos to acquire stem cells in cloning, this process poses a danger to humanity as many lives are sacrificed for the creation of just one living human clone. Furthermore, the resulting clone simply replicates the original individual, indicating its incomplete functionality.

Allowing and perceiving cloning as ethical would diminish the importance of marriage, potentially disrupting social structure by prioritizing cloning over procreation. This could lead to a society consisting solely of clones. Additionally, religious beliefs highlight the sanctity of

life and the notion that human beings are made in God's image. As such, human life is sacred while clones are not considered part of God's creation.

It is essential to acknowledge that life comes from God, and therefore He determines the fate of the clone. As it goes against the sanctity of the Creator, cloning is both illegal and unethical. Humans should not try to imitate God, especially in terms of His supernatural abilities. The development of cloning will inevitably lead to deaths, indicating a breach of legislation. Regardless of age, every person has the right to life as granted by the law.

As a result, the act of killing embryos to obtain ingredients renders human cloning illegal. Therefore, I strongly support political leaders who take decisive measures to prevent such practices in society. Any event or action that endangers humanity's well-being is deemed unlawful and should be completely eliminated. In my opinion, those engaged in cloning are violating the law by defying legal provisions.

It is imperative that the law treats those who act above it appropriately. The existence of living things is determined by nature, not humans. Therefore, cloning poses a major pollution threat as it goes against the natural order. Nature does not allow any alteration to human structure, making cloning morally and ethically unacceptable.

Cloning diminishes the dignity of organisms that supply the cells and necessitates the utilization of detrimental substances and chemicals, resulting in an imbalance within the natural ecosystem. Consequently, cloning is detrimental and should be completely ceased. I wholeheartedly endorse parliamentary acts that have outlawed cloning and call upon all nations to do likewise by implementing legislation to make this practice

a criminal offense.

Furthermore, those responsible for this process should face legal accountability as they are individuals committing criminal acts. In my view, human cloning is morally unacceptable and contradicts the ethical standards upheld by any mentally stable society. It devalues human life and undermines its sanctity conferred by the Creator. Moreover, it violates the fundamental right to life guaranteed by the highest legal authority in any nation. Thus, it has no place in society. I firmly believe that this wrongdoing will never be legalized or considered morally acceptable. It is crucial for all well-intentioned individuals concerned about their own well-being and the integrity of the natural world to collaborate with government authorities to eliminate human cloning and discourage any attempts at engaging in it using all appropriate means.

It is crucial to declare cloning as illegal, immoral, and unethical for humanity due to the threat it poses to society's authentic identity and dignity. It is essential that individuals safeguard their own interests and those of their loved ones by opposing this dangerous practice. I wholeheartedly support those who refuse to engage in this risky and demeaning behavior.