The Case for Black Lives Matter Movement Essay Example

if the roles were reversed, opponents of the movement would advocate for capital punishment for offenders. The political divide witnessed in recent activities over the past decade has reached an unprecedented level.

This text examines the impact of specific individual actions and unjust laws, like stop-and-frisk, in the present circumstances. It centers on the enforcement of stop-and-frisk regulations in New York State and cites Kenneth Jost's 2000 article "Racial Profiling," which discusses Floyd vs. New York State as a notable case. This particular case revolves around David Floyd, a 33-year-old who faced mistreatment from law enforcement officers. Despite Mayor Bloomberg and the Police Commissioner attributing this legislation to the decrease in crime rates within the city.

Although there are positive outcomes resulting from this law, certain aspects of it are considered illegal. Non-white individuals, specifically Blacks and Hispanics, have a higher chance of being stopped by police officers in comparison to white individuals. This has led to the emergence of the term "racial profiling," which refers to assuming guilt based on one's race. Interestingly, in New York state where stop-and-frisk laws were prevalent, 53 percent of stops made between 2004 and 2012 targeted Blacks while 32 percent targeted Hispanics. It is ironic because African-Americans make up only 26 percent and Hispanics represent just 23 percent of the city's population. Ultimately, on August 12th, 2017, Judge Shira Scheindlin declared that these stop-and-frisk tactics were unconstitutional and violated the rights of minorities in New York City.

According to Jost (2013), the ongoing protests by the Black Lives Movement have highlighted legislations such as stop-and-frisk, but they have not effectively closed racial divides. Critics claim that the movement lacks a consistent

ideology and frequently alters its objectives. Although initially centered on police misconduct, the movement has broadened its agenda to tackle inequalities in employment and healthcare. The primary goal of the Black Lives Matter Movement is to ensure equal safety and fair treatment from America's criminal justice system for individuals of all races.

Although there are arguments claiming that the protest methods used by the Black Lives Matter Movement are violent and uncivilized, it is crucial to universally embrace this movement as a way of life. It surpasses mere ideology and instead promotes equal protection under the law for all races rather than just one particular race. This criticism has been voiced by individuals from diverse sectors of society, including Black Civil Rights Leaders, State Officials, and Police Officers.

The text discusses how protests in cities are causing disruptions to traffic flow by blocking highways and main streets. According to Gale (2018), the Ferguson protests showed hostility towards law enforcement and white individuals, as reported by cities. The article presents an example of a lone wolf attacker who murdered five police officers in Dallas, Texas in July 2016, using this incident to support their argument. However, subsequent investigations revealed that the shooter had no connection with the Black Lives Matter Movement. Ultimately, similar to the Civil Rights Movement, the Black Lives Matter Movement functions as a social tool that draws attention to societal issues within our nation. To facilitate change, it is crucial for us to acknowledge our mistakes and take appropriate measures to rectify them.

The Black Lives Matter Movement recognizes the disparity in our societal framework and advocates for nationwide advancement in fostering the welfare of all

Americans. It underscores our shared duty towards one another.