Research Vaccine Paper Essay Example
Research Vaccine Paper Essay Example

Research Vaccine Paper Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
Topics:
  • Pages: 8 (2070 words)
  • Published: August 26, 2021
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Epidemic, an outbreak of disease that spreads quickly and affects many individuals at the same time (Webster Dictionary ). Epidemics were a big problem in past societies because there was no way to completely stop a disease from flooding a population or community, at least until vaccines were created. Vaccines have been around for centuries and are still used today to help prevent further epidemics. There are several different vaccines that are administered, mostly before the age of 5, to people to try and prevent the further spreading of various diseases.

The biggest issue in today’s society is the decision on whether or not vaccines are safe, especially for children. Although health officials have continued to try and inform the public that

eck-text__match red frequency--match check-text__match--highlight" data-match-index-1="0">vaccines are indeed safe, there are people who are still concerned with how safe vaccines really are. Opposition of these vaccines have risen from the suspected ideas that vaccines are not safe and cause cognitive problems because of the chance that a child can get mercury poisoning or even develop symptoms of autism. Parents and people of the community are not the only people concerned about vaccines, public health officials are also concerned about what the consequences are when a community or an individual chooses not to vaccinate. For there is validity in thes

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

concerns, however, upon further research, it is clear that the safest decision one can make for themselves and for the community is to get vaccinated.

Vaccines have been around for ages, since 1798, when the smallpox vaccine was created. Edward Jenner was the man who found that cowpox actually gives immunity to someone with smallpox. He is also known as the man that created vaccinology (The Immunization Advisory Centre). This vaccine was revolutionary because it was the first time a disease could be prevented. This prevention has changed science, medicine, and the community. Vaccines have changed the community because with this new immunity to the vaccine came a change in the demographics.

This vaccine changed the lives of millions because it guaranteed immunity and gave many people the chance to live longer. The community now has the chance to have longer life spans and be able to have more children. Along with this change in community, this first vaccine allowed for further research in immunity and has aided in the creation of new vaccines. Vaccines have helped communities live longer and has helped scientists advance their medical technologies.

Now, this sounds like an overall great addition to society, so what is the issue with vaccines? Public health officials have always been concerned

with epidemics because a lot of diseases can easily be spread and can also be lethal, that is why it is much safer for a parent to vaccinate their children, for the better of their child and their community. The concerns revolving around vaccines include whether or not the cons of vaccinating their children outweigh the pros. Children get vaccinated in order to prevent them from getting a lethal disease, which was the main reason why the vaccine was created. Something as common as the flu can lead to death because it can cause pneumonia and blood infections (CDC). If children do not get vaccinated, they can be up to 35 times more likely to contract the disease compared to those children who have become immune through vaccinations (Omer). There are a few cases that have occurred where a child has reacted poorly to vaccine, but it is very unlikely.

These cases are so unlikely to happen it statistically only occurs about 1 in every million, which is a very slim chance (CDC). Children need these vaccines to ensure that they live longer lives and continue to live healthier lives. Through vaccines, people have lived longer. According to Rino Rappuoli, vaccines have helped increase life expectancy for age 58 to

age 70, which is a large gap considering someone could live 12 years longer than before.

For it is understandable that there are is of course a slight chance that someone Vaccines are accessible for people of their community to prevent them from dying of specific diseases. Along with reasoning on why someone should be vaccinated for their own health, people must be vaccinated to ensure the health of their community as well. If a parent is refusing that their child not be vaccinated, they are putting everyone at risk because th child could have the lethal disease without being aware. This is due to the fact that every disease as an incubation period, the time period in which the disease is in the body before showing any symptoms.

The incubation period is crucial to spreading disease because the virus or bacteria is nesting in the body while the child is asymptomatic, having a disease but not showing any signs are symptoms. If a child remains unvaccinated, they are putting other kids in danger as well. Like in the past, if there are less people vaccinated, the more people actually get the disease. There have been studies that show that communities wither higher immunization reports have fewer cases of these diseases (Omer). For example, back in 2008 there was a measles outbreak in Washington of 19 cases, 18 of those cases were unvaccinated children. One of the cases was an infant that could not yet be

class="custom-blot check-text__match red frequency--match check-text__match--highlight" data-match-index-1="0">vaccinated that contracted the disease (Omer).

Not vaccinating one child ended up affected nineteen other children’s lives, what would happen if a larger amount of children didn’t get vaccinated? Not vaccinating one’s child not only puts themselves at risk of death, but puts the community also at risk, especially to those who physically cannot receive the vaccine. Different opinions have rose because there have been cases in the past that show that vaccines are not safe because of its contents. Vaccines have been known to contain Thimerosal which is used as a preservative in a multitude of vaccines (Dorea) . Thimerosal is a chemical component that contains 50% ethylmercury which has been a concern to parents and the community because it contains mercury and they do not want to run the risk of their child possibly getting mercury poisoning. Symptoms revolving around mercury poisoning include numbing of the hands, feet, and around the mouth, loss of peripheral vision, and loss of coordination (EPA).

Parents have chosen not to vaccinate their children because of the slight chance that their children can get mercury poisoning from the small amounts of Thimerosal. Concerning vaccines, parents have become more consciousness about the less common outcomes of receiving the vaccines. According to the World Health Organization, they

claim that the small amounts of Thimerosal in the different vaccines that a child receives is safe enough for them (Dorea). For Thimerosal is in a variety of vaccines, it is only used a preservative and it is safe enough for a child to receive any vaccine that includes Thimerosal.

Also, if a parent is still concerned about the contents of the vaccine, there are options where a parent can ask for a Thimerosal free vaccine. Another issue that has stopped parents from allowing their children to receive a vaccine is the fact that there was an issue going around stating that a mandatory vaccine was causing children to develop symptoms of autism. The measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) is the main vaccine that is associated with autism symptoms. The MMR vaccine is mandatory in most states to be allowed to register for kindergarten. It is also a vaccine that requires two separate doses all before the age of six with at least five weeks between doses.

The original issue on the possible correlation between autism and vaccines started when there was a paper published by Andrew Wakefield, a British gastroenterologist, that studied eight different children after they had received the MMR

check-text__match red frequency--match check-text__match--highlight" data-match-index-1="0">vaccine. After observing and looking into the health of the eight children, his study concluded that this vaccine had caused problems to their intestinal track and ultimately their brain affecting cognitive development (Gerber). The cognitive develop was revolved around autistic similarities like the fact that children that have been diagnosed with autism have similar intestinal track issues, like the children that were studied in his research. After these studies and reports were released, there was immediate reactions from parents and people of the community and there was a dramatic drop in the number of children receiving the MMR vaccine because of the great concern for their children’s health. However, after these conclusions were released, there were further studies done that rebut their claims.

The most informational and important study was done by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention did a study on mercury poisoning and vaccines with thimerosal in them. The follow up studies revealed that even though the vaccine contained 50% ethylmercury, children did not show any signs or symptoms of possible mercury poisoning (Gerber). This is due to the fact the contents of the Thimerosal in the vaccine is in such low quantities there is no way that the patient would experience any mercury poisoning. It is also due to the fact that ethylmercury is an organic mercury which I already much safer than methylmercury, which is the common mercury that is found in seafood that have been known

to cause mercury poisoning when consumed in large quantities.

Also, after Wakefield published his paper, there were several different studies conducted trying to find similar outcomes to back up Wakefield’s claims, but studies only showed that children who developed autistic qualities actually occurred before they received the MMR vaccine (Public Health). Other researchers and physicians found that Wakefield’s initial research was actually highly inaccurate. When wanting to replicate the research Wakefield and his fellow colleagues did, it was very hard to replicate the study and couldn’t be done. It was also shown that the techniques that were used in the study were flawed which resulted in possible false positives (Novella) . These false positives ultimately caused a large group of families to suffer because they trusted the research done by Wakefield and when it was found that what he had done was wrong made parents even more suspicious of what else could be false.

Overall, upon further research, it is clear that there are no direct causations between vaccines and autism because the research done by Wakefield was found incorrect and follow up research was conducted saying that the MMR vaccine is safe for use. When research was concluded that the MMR vaccine did not have a direct causation to children developing autistic symptoms, other accusations came around. Instead of the problem with specifically MMR vaccine, parents became more concerned with the amount of vaccines children were receiving might cause autism.

This theory came from the case of a nine-year-old girl that reported that her encephalopathy, which contains common features of autism, had gotten worse after she received multiply vaccines within a short period of time (Gerber). This report caused parents to start associating the amount of vaccines and autism together. Parents and people of the community started to believe that the amount of vaccines that were being put onto the children were hurting or weaking their immune system causing the body to create this autoimmune response that relates back to autism.

After researching the following studies and claims, it is apparent that it is safer and more beneficial for people to get vaccinated. Vaccines were created in order to prevent people from dying of the diseases. It is understandable that there are cases that have shown negative outcomes of vaccines, but it is safer to take that risk than the risk of dying from a disease that could have been prevented through vaccines. Vaccinating one’s child is completely safer for the child and the community.

Works Cited

  1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. “Influenza (Flu) Vaccine.” Center for Disease Control and Prevention (7 August 2015). https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/flu.html
  2. Gerber, Jeffery S., and Paul A. Offit. “Vaccines and Autism: A Tale of Shifting Hypotheses.” Infectious Disease Society of

America (7 January 2009): 456-461.

  • Public Health. “Vaccine Myths Debunked.” Public Health. https://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/vaccine-myths-debunked/
  • Omer, Saad B., Daniel A. Salmon, Walter A.

    Orenstein, M. Patricia DeHart, and Neal Halsey. “Vaccine Refusal, Mandatory Immunization, and the Risks of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases.” The New England Journal of Medicine (7 March 2012): 1981-1988.

  • The Immunization Advisory Centre. “A brief history of vaccination.” The Immunization Advisory Centre (April 2017). http://www.immune.org.nz/vaccines/vaccine-development/brief-history-vaccination
  • Get an explanation on any task
    Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
    New