Hume (Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding)
17 test answers
Unlock all answers in this set
Unlock answers 17question
When Hume brings up the example of one billiard ball's striking another, why does he point out that I could conceive 100 different events following from the impact of the first on the second? (Section 4)
answer
Can only infer how the ball will move based on experiences. Nothing in the cause will imply the effect, we can only know once it has happened. We can't assume an effect until we've seen it play out
Unlock the answer
question
Hume identifies custom or habit as a special principle of human nature that determines us to a very important activity. What is that activity, and why can it only be custom and habit that determines us in this way? (Section 5)
answer
Custom determines inference, makes our experiences useful. Without custom, we would be aloof of all matters of fact b/c we would not be able to infer causal relations. Custom and habit allow us to apply our experiences to a present event.
Unlock the answer
question
What is the difference, according to Hume, between entertaining a fiction and holding a belief--for instance, between regarding Santa Claus as a myth and believing that Santa Claus rides a sleigh on Christmas Eve? (Section 5)
answer
Belief is a more vivid and lively than imagination. Fictions become beliefs when there is more feeling associated with it (comes through experiencing an idea). Belief helps to distinguish the ideas of judgment from the fictions of the imagination.
Unlock the answer
question
How does Hume argue that we do not have a legitimate idea of necessary connection? How is this related to the problem of whether the conclusions of inductive arguments are certain? (Section 7)
answer
Posses no sensory perfection of cause, but can infer an effect based on experience. So, not positive sun will rise, but can infer it will based on past experiences.
Unlock the answer
question
If an impression of necessary connection is not given in experience, what does this imply about knowledge of the external world, for an empiricist? Would a rationalist think knowledge is affected by this point? (Section 7)
answer
Empiricist: No certainty in external world Rationalist: Can use reason in external world
Unlock the answer
question
What is the difference between our seeing events as causally connected and as merely correlated, on Hume's view?
answer
Causally connected: implies a force that is not there/ event is never observed by humans Merely correlated events: associated in our imagination as highly likely to be together. The sight of one brings to mind the idea of the other
Unlock the answer
question
What does Hume finally conclude is the sentiment or impression from which we derive the idea of necessary connection, and what does habit have to do with the experiencing of this sentiment? (Section 7)
answer
The impression from which we derive the idea of necessary connection is an experienced constant conjunction. Simply a certainty that what we think will happen will happen. Habit affirms these feelings of certainty
Unlock the answer
question
What part does the imagination play in producing the idea of necessary connection? (Section 7)
answer
Imagination is where we make connections between the two objects. Imagination drives inference when coupled with habit
Unlock the answer
question
What do you think of Hume's analysis of causation?
answer
Very hard to argue
Unlock the answer
question
On what grounds do we evaluate the reliability of testimony? (Section 10)
answer
We evaluate testimony on; its coherence with other accounts, the consistency of argument, the character of testifier, and relationship between the testifier/the testament
Unlock the answer
question
How does Hume define a miracle? (Section 10)
answer
Hume defines a miracle as going against the laws of nature that we have drawn up based on past experiences
Unlock the answer
question
Why does Hume think that belief in miracles is unreasonable? (Section 10)
answer
Hume's Maxim: No testimony is strong enough to establish a miracle unless the proving the testimony wrong is more miraculous than the act itself. Believes you can counter any testimony with evidence/experience. Evidence that is based in repeated experience
Unlock the answer
question
Do you find his argument about belief in miracles persuasive? Why or why not?
answer
Opinion
Unlock the answer