Role of Communication in Change Management Essay Example
Role of Communication in Change Management Essay Example

Role of Communication in Change Management Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 4 (995 words)
  • Published: March 15, 2017
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Change management is a structured approach to transitioning individuals, teams, and organizations from a current state to a desired future state. Change management is a systematic approach to dealing with change, both from the perspective of an organization and on the individual level. It is a set of processes that are employed to ensure that significant changes are implemented in an orderly, controlled, and systematic fashion to effect organizational change.

The objective of change management is to maximize the collective benefits for all people involved in the change and minimize the risk of failure of implementing the change One of the goals of change management is regards the human aspects of overcoming resistance to change in order for organizational members to buy into change and achieve the organization's goal of an orderly and effective transformation.

  • Why Change management?

Man

...

agement’s first responsibility is to identify processes or behaviors that are not proficient and come up with new behaviors, processes, etc that are more effective within an organization. Once changes are identified, it is important for managers to estimate the impact that they will have on the organization and individual employees on many levels including technology, employee behavior, work processes, etc.

At this point management should assess the employee's reaction to an implemented change and try to understand the reaction to it. In many cases, change can be extremely beneficial with lots of positives, however, certain changes do sometimes produce a tremendous amount of resistance.

Even though users welcome the changes introduced by these projects, they will still undergo the emotional cycle of change. It is important to communicate with affected personnel beforehand to limit the impact of the change o

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

business operations.

  • Communication and Change - Who, What, When?

As a change leader we need to make decisions about who you must communicate with, what needs to be communicated, when you will communicate and how you will do it.

Who? Managers sometimes have a tendency to communicate about change on a "need to know basis". However, effective change leaders recognize that almost any change will have effects on most people in an organization, no matter how resistant they are towards the change. The basic rule of thumb is that communication should take place directly between the manager and employees when employees. Except for situations that involve confidentiality, even those who are indirectly affected will likely want to know what is going on, and how it may affect them.

What? If you need to determine what to communicate, keep in mind what you are trying to accomplish through your communication about change. When you communicate you are trying to:

  • Give information that will reduce uncertainty and ambiguity regarding the change.
  • Pre-empt the hidden information system of the grapevine, so you can ensure that incorrect anxiety provoking information is not spreading.
  • Provide forums for employees to communicate their reactions and concerns to you.

When? While deciding what should be communicated, communicate as much information about the change as is available to you. If you only have a small amount of information about a negative change, communicating it may increase anxiety levels and rampant speculation. As a change leader, you must be aware that your staff will watch you carefully to guess how you are feeling about the change, and they will draw their own conclusions based on your behavior. Sometimes these

conclusions will be wrong and destructive.

The longer you wait to communicate details of change, the more likely you are to extend the period of adjustment. This is because it is very difficult to "keep a lid" on anything in government, and even if you are silent, your staff will likely hear vague things through the grapevine. Grapevine information tends to be sketchy enough that it creates a high degree of anxiety, and also a high degree of mistrust of management. So, the earlier you communicate the less likely erroneous or upsetting information will come through the grapevine. Communicate as early as possible about change, but do not assume that once you have done this the job is over. Communication should occur in anticipation of change, during the implementation, and after the change has been stabilized.

Strategies for Communicating Change

Spray and Pray

Employees are showered with a wide variety of information. More information is assumed to equal better communication. Managers pray that staff will pick up on what is needed to be done. The upside of this strategy is that staff is exposed to extensive company information. The downside is that the staff is often unable to discern significant from insignificant information; understand what is happening but not why; and are overloaded with information.

Tell and Sell

Information is provided to staff, but it is limited to core organizational issues. Management attempts to both inform staff about changes and sell them on why they are required. The downside of this approach is the potential for employee skepticism cynicism since no meaningful dialogue is entered into with them; they become the passive recipients of the next wave of changed proposals.

Underscore and

Explore

Fundamental issues remain the focus, but management engages employees in a dialogue about the change process and seeks to identify obstacles and misunderstandings that will need to be addressed.

Identify and Reply

A defensive strategy, it is used to identify and respond to employee rumors and innuendos regarding changes and work practices .It is an attempt to help staff, make sense out of issues that are confusing to them. The downside of this strategy is that it is reactive and assumes, usually inaccurately, that staff knows the key strategic and organizational issues that need to be addressed.

Withhold and Uphold

Information is withheld until it is absolutely necessary to release it, and management adopts a party line on issues that they uphold publicly. Information is not open and a bitter staff culture is likely to be the result.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New