One and Done Essay Example

prepare for the NBA, allowing them to mature emotionally, gain physical strength, and overall readiness. Players such as Brad Mullens from Ohio State Buckeyes initially had aspirations to go professional straight out of high school, but were unable due to this rule. However, Mullens now appreciates his attendance at Ohio State and supports the rule as he believes it offers youngsters a chance for growth.

Colleges perceive a beneficial impact when star athletes such as Derrick Rose and Greg Oden are obligated to attend college for a year, driving substantial profits due to increased television, merchandising, and attendance revenues that these players generate. Fans also appreciate this regulation as they have the opportunity to watch their preferred players perform at a collegiate level instead of being side-lined in the NBA. However, the "one and done" rule also yields unfavorable implications on both players and colleges. There are concerns among some colleges regarding the possible detriment to academic excellence due to these "one and done" players.

Some athletes are aware that their tenure in school is limited to a single year and thus, have little interest in their grade performance. To retain their eligibility, they only need six credit hours in the autumn term and can leave after the basketball season concludes. Ohio State forfeited two scholarships due to two "one-and-done" players who opted to participate in the NBA draft and did not withdraw from their classes in a timely manner. Had these players withdrawn before the April 15 deadline, Ohio State wouldn't have needed to forfeit any scholarships. NBA point guard Brandon Jennings chose to play basketball in Europe as a workaround for

the rule preventing him from entering the NBA immediately.

The possibility that elite athletes like Brandon Jennings might choose European leagues over college could result in a substantial financial loss for higher education institutions. This decision, which can earn them millions, is perceived as unfair by many and has ignited considerable controversy. A large number of players, coaches, and fans assert that limiting these athletes' earnings is unconstitutional. The argument is that if an 18-year-old is considered capable enough to be sent to Iraq, they should also have the right to play professional basketball in the NBA. Respected college basketball coaches such as Bill Self from Kansas and Tom Izzo from Michigan State have expressed strong condemnation of this rule; they maintain it's unjust not giving players the freedom to determine their career paths.

The regulation has impacted player recruitment as athletes can depart after a mere year, leading to gaps in team rosters. Evidently, the NBA's contentious move to increase the age limit has had numerous benefits and drawbacks for the NBA, educational institutions, and players themselves. Presently, the NBA is experiencing a lockout, and this matter is among the final topics under discussion. A potential amendment to this rule could bring about a variety of new implications for players, educational establishments, coaching staff, and the NBA as a whole.