EAA Test – Flashcard

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers
question
What is an argument?
answer
Any text -written, visual, or spoken - that expresses a point of view.
question
Humor
answer
Causes readers to recognize how things are (the truth of the joke that we acknowledge when we laugh) and how they might be different. -the sugar that makes the medicine go down. puts readers at ease. -HOWEVER: humor in bad taste discredits a writer completely -Politicians use it to admit to problems or mistakes that they couldnt acknowledge in any other way. Ridicule: humor aimed at a particular target. powerful, but not well intentioned. -> ridicule = double-edged sword. if target doesn't deserve assault and you cant be VERY funny, then avoid it -How it helps Ethos: we'll often listen to people who are confident enough to make fun of themselves, because it means they are clever but also aware of their own limitations.
question
Most Obvious Arguments
answer
Those that make a direct claim based on or drawn from evidence.
question
Invitational Argument
answer
Aims not to defeat another person or group but to invite others to enter a space of mutual regard and exploration.
question
Argument vs. Persuasion
answer
Argument- uses evidence and reason to discover some version of the truth. Leads audiences toward conviction. Persuasion - aims to change a point of view or to move others from from conviction to action. "People argue to discover the truth and persuade when they think they already know it."
question
Conviction
answer
An agreement that a claim is true.
question
Propaganda
answer
An argument that sets out to persuade at all costs, abandoning truth, reason, and fairness.
question
Rogerian Argument
answer
(Named after psycho-therapist Carl Rogers) Based on approaching audiences in non-threatening ways and on finding common ground and establishing trust among those who disagree about issues.
question
Arguments to Inform
answer
Main purpose is to tell members of an audience something they didn't know.
question
Arguments to Convince
answer
Aim to convince readers rather than win out over opponents.
question
Arguments to Make Decisions
answer
*Closely allied to exploratory arguments. Often, the result of those may be to argue for a particular decision. *Argue your way through alternatives with yourself, friends, colleagues, or family *Pros and cons
question
Arguments to Meditate or Pray
answer
The writer or speaker is often hoping to transform something in him- or herself or to reach a state of equilibrium/peace of mind.
question
Academic Arguments
answer
An argument held to the standards of a particular professional field or discipline. *More formal and impersonal style than arguments in the public arena, often.
question
Classification Overlap
answer
When classifying argument, it is common that they will span over more than one category. For example, arguments about the past with implications for the future or arguments about the future with bearings on the past.
question
Arguments about the Past
answer
*What DID happen?* A.k.a. forensic arguments. Often used in business, gvmt, academia, and criminal/civil cases. -Relies heavily on evidence and testimony in order to recreate what can be known about events that already occurred. -Also relies on precedents -Doesn't have to be heated. Can be simply exploratory and open-ended
question
Precedents
answer
actions or decisions in the past that influence policies or decisions in the present.
question
Arguments about the Future
answer
*What WILL or SHOULD happen?* a.k.a. deliberative arguments. Often used in legislature, congresses, and parliaments, which are called "deliberative bodies" b/c they establish policies for the future. -B/c what happened in the past affects decisions about the future, deliberative judgements rely on prior forensic arguments. -> relies on past occurrences to support points on the future. -Reasoned guesses
question
Arguments about the Present
answer
a.k.a. Epideictic arguments or ceremonial arguments b/c they tend to be in public settings, like speeches, sermons, eulogies, inaugural addresses, and civic remarks of all kind. Often about contemporary values - the beliefs and assumptions that are widely held (or debated) in a society. -Commonly about praising what's admirable and blaming what's not.
question
Stasis Theory
answer
A way of categorizing arguments by their stasis - the kind of issues they address.
question
Stasis Questions
answer
These help determine the POINT OF CONTENTION in an argument. Which question is the argument focusing on? -Did something happen? -What is its nature? -What is its quality or cause? -What actions should be taken?
question
Arguments of Fact
answer
"Did something happen?" -Usually involves a statement that can be proved or disproved with specific evidence or testimony. -Often is more complicated than you would think, because many points have to be looked at and agreed on before you can move forward with evidence.
question
Arguments of Definition
answer
"What is its nature?" OR "What is the nature of the thing?" -Often involves determining whether one known object or action belongs in a second - and highly contested - category. EX: Abortion or Gay Marriage
question
Arguments of Evaluation or Causality
answer
"What is its quality or cause?" -Definition explains whether a corvette is a sports car. Evaluation/causality argues whether its a GOOD sports car or BETTER than others. -Typically, you present criteria and then measure individual things against those standards. -CAUSALITY: we want to know why something happened, what factors have shaped the situation we're in, or what might happen in the future as a result of what actions we take now. = how/why something happened
question
Proposal Arguments
answer
"What actions should be taken?" How to begin: make sure you can shape it as a convincingly severe problem. THEN: the question. It will lead you to develop proposals for action.
question
Intended Audience
answer
Readers existing in the writer's mind.
question
Invoked readers
answer
Those readers represented in the text.
question
Real readers
answer
Readers as they actually exist, which may not be among those originally intended by the author.
question
Use of Personal Pronouns
answer
It can sometimes establish common ground, but it is risky. If readers don't fit into an "us" they may feel excluded. They've suddenly become "they" or "them".
question
Contexts
answer
Reading takes place in a series of contexts that move outward like concentric circles from the most immediate situation to broader environments. -From where people are reading the story. -What's happened to the readers in the past.
question
Pathos
answer
Emotional appeals. Generate emotions in readers that shape their responses and dispose them to accept a claim.
question
Ethos
answer
Presentation of self. Make an ethical appeal by proving that you know what you're talking about. Build credibility by emphasizing that you and your audience share the same value and that you respect them. Show that you are even-handed. -a particular character will not appeal to every audience
question
Logos
answer
Appeals to logic. The FACTS.
question
The rhetorical situation
answer
'''''''''''''''''''''''' Topic/Message ''''''''''''''''''''''' (logical appeals) ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' / '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' /''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' /_____ Audience/Readers ''''''''' Speaker/Writer (emotional appeals) '''''' (Ethical Appeals)
question
Rhetorical Turn of Mind
answer
Change of audience in a project can lead you to reconsider your appeals. Chape of topic may require rethinking your audience. ->Thinking like that is developing a rhetorical turn of mind.
question
How Pathos can be bad
answer
Democracies suffer when people use emotional arguments (and related fallacies like personal attacks and name calling) to drive wedges between groups, making them fearful or hateful.
question
Pathos - Move to Action
answer
Works well when you're trying to move an audience to action. Readers may agree that contributing to charity is a noble act, but this conviction may not be enough to persuade them to actually donate. WAYS EMOTION CAN GET THEM TO DONATE: -embarrass them into contributing to a good cause -make them feel the impact of their gift -tell them a moving story
question
Using Emotion to Build Bridges
answer
Use emotion to establish common ground/assure readers that you understand their experiences. -Connect emotionally by making the readers feel empathy -When supporting a risky claim that most audiences may not agree with, put yourself in a situation that the whole audience would understand so that you leave yourself open to both sides of the argument.
question
Using Emotions to Sustain an Argument
answer
-Pathos can make logical claims stronger or more memorable. CAUTION: lay on too much emotion-esp. outrage, pity, or shame, which make people uncomfortable- and you may end up offending your audience. -Emotion can be generated when you present an argument in its starkest terms, stripped of qualifications or subtleties.
question
Pathos: the happy medium
answer
Don't play puppet master with people's emotions, but do spend time early on thinking about how you want readers to feel as they consider your persuasive claims.
question
Human-Interest Stories
answer
Stories that give presence to issues or arguments.
question
The parts of Ethos
answer
-Must seem honest and likeable -Affirm an identity and share parts or all of it with an intended audience.
question
The "Claims" of Ethos
answer
-A person(or group) does or does not have the authority to speak to this issue. -A person (or g) is or is not trustworthy or credible on this issue. A pers. (or g) does or does not have good motives for addressing this subject.
question
"Professionals" vs. Neighborhood guy in Ethos
answer
-To answer serious questions, people typically turn to professionals - doctors, lawyers, teachers, pastors - for wise, well-informed, and frank advice. -People will listen to those that they know&trust more than they will listen to a stranger. That is why people will trust the word of the "car guy" over the reviews in Consumer Reports.
question
Pathos leading to Ethos
answer
Sometimes, gut-wrenching personal experience leads to a sense of Ethos/expertise.
question
Ethos is Personal Titles
answer
Writers will attach academic and professional titles to their names (i.e. Dr., PhD.) which subtly builds their authority by saying "this is how I've earned the right to be heard".
question
Authority vs. Credibility
answer
Whereas authority is a measure of how much command a writer has over a subject, credibility speaks to a writer's honesty, respect for an audience and its values, and plain old likability. -You can establish credibility by connecting your own beliefs to core principles that are well-established and well-respected.
question
Bibliographies & Ethos
answer
Back up reasonable claims with evidence and documentation. In an online format, make sure you're linking back to reliable sites where you got your info.
question
Presentation of Self
answer
Readers and audiences will respond to how you present yourself when making an argument. That's why the student who turns in an important, formal paper on neatly typed pages will be better received by the teacher than the student who turns in a sloppily handwritten essay that's been ripped from a spiral notebook. -Choose your medium carefully. Do you need graphs? Should there be extensive footnotes, or should it be crisply written in a block of text?
question
Respect for readers
answer
Address them neither above or below their capabilities. Use helpful graphs. Cite trustworthy sources to show you've done your homework.
question
Conditions of Rebuttal
answer
Making concessions within the argument to objections that readers might raise. They send a strong signal to the audience that you've scrutinized your own position. Envision your most annoying and critical audience and it will help you work out weak parts of the argument
question
Tone
answer
If in doubt, always show respect: politeness is rarely if ever inappropriate.
question
Motives
answer
Motives affect your credibility. -"What interests are they serving? How will they PROFIT from their proposal?" People will look at your associations and attack them if they are bad. Such attacks are common in political circles. These associations can ruin your credibility by showing you have bad motives.
question
Logos v. Ethos
answer
People are often inclined to test the facts against our feelings and against the ethos of those making the appeal.
question
Hard Evidence
answer
To Aristotle: inartistic appeals-facts, clues, statistics, testimonies, witnesses. -People often prefer arguments based on fact and testimony to those grounded in reason alone. Sometimes can be doctored. If this is discovered, is it no longer fact? Often, the ethos is ruined.
question
Artistic appeals
answer
Reason and common sense. Artistic and inartistic often overlap.
question
Smoking gun
answer
the piece of hard evidence that ties a defendant to a crime.
question
Aristotle thought that all arguments could be reduced to what two components?
answer
Statement + proof aka Claim + supporting evidence
question
Facts
answer
"We'll even listen to people that we don't agree with if they can overwhelm us with evidence". -Arguing with facts sometimes involves challenging the biases of even the most reputable sources.
question
Statistics
answer
Even if numbers (statistics) are accurate, writers need to interpret them for the purposes of their argument because numbers cannot stand alone.
question
Surveys and polls
answer
Polls come as close to expressing the will of the people as anything short of an election (the most decisive poll of all. -Make sure you scrutinize the context, and therefore ethos, of the poll. -Don't discount a poll b/c its findings aren't what you'd hoped for. Info that goes against what you thought is useful, too. -Make sure you read the analysis of poll results. Like statistics, polls often cannot stand on their own when put in the context of supporting an argument. -Need to word questions correctly... -Keep date in mind. As time changes, it affects accuracy.
question
Testimonies and Narratives
answer
Human experience as fact. -often used in court. -Personal experience carefully reported can also support a claim convincingly, esp. if the writer has earned the trust of readers (Logos & ethos & maybe a little pathos).
question
Logic
answer
A formal study of principles of reasoning
question
Syllogisms
answer
A vehicle of deductive reasoning ex: All human beings are mortal Socrates is a human being Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
question
Undistributed middle term
answer
An error in syllogisms. Ex: Penguins are black and white. Some old TV shows are black and white. Therefore, some penguins are old TV shows. "Black and white" is the U.M.T.
question
Informal v. Formal logic
answer
People use informal logic without even realizing it, unconsciously stating claims, drawing conclusions, and making/questioning assumptions when reading or writing.
question
Enthymeme
answer
An ordinary king of sentence that includes both a claim and a reason but depends on the audience's agreement with an assumption that is left implicit rather than spelled out. -Enthy's are "compressed arguments" based on what the audiences know and will accept. -Some need credible evidence to back up the claim of fact - they aren't as straightforward. Ex: We'd better cancel the picnic because it's going to rain.
question
In the US, few arguments work better than those based on the principles of _________ and _________ +HOWEVER
answer
Fairness and Equality _sometimes, fairness is good enough as a reason. You don't need to convince someone that it's bad not to be fair. HOWEVER: different values are embedded in different cultures and make for good argumentative support, depending on the audience.
question
Degree
answer
Most audiences accept: "More of a good thing or less of a bad thing is good"
question
Analogy
answer
DEF: explains one idea or concept by comparing it to something else. Typically a complex or extended comparison.
question
Precedent
answer
It is an argument of two comparable institutions: for example: x Place already does something, therefore Y place can do it too. Court Precedents: What courts have decided in the past often determines how courts will rule on a similar/related issue.
question
Rhetorical Analysis
answer
A close reading of a text to find out how and whether it works to persuade HOW IT WORKS: analyzing how well the component of an argument work together to persuade or move an audience
question
Ways style can go wrong
answer
If it's dull, off-key, or offensive
question
Inductive reasoning vs. Deductive reasoning
answer
the process of generalizing on the basis of a number of specific examples. Find many specific bits of evidence and combine for a generalization/conclusion vs. -assume MAJOR PREMISE (general principal) -apply to MINOR PREMISE (specific case) -get conclusion basis of syllogisms
question
Rogerian argument
answer
Those involved in disputes should not respond to each other until you understand and can fairly state the opposing person's position. More likely to search for compromise (apply to argument by explaining how it benefits your side)
question
Toulmin Argment
answer
-Claim, reasons, warrant -Qualifiers!
question
Claim, reason, warrant
answer
Claim: debatable or controversial statements that you hope to prove (dont eat the mushroom) Reason: supports claim (it is poisonous) Warrant: the logical/persuasive connection between a claim and the reasons and data supporting it (eating poisonous things is dangerous). DOn't let one warrant contradict another.
question
Backing
answer
Evidence used to support a warrant
question
Different ways a term can be defined
answer
-by what it is -by what it isn't -what it includes (and excludes!) -by specific examples -by what authorities observe -by feelings
question
Why definitions matter
answer
they are arguments that define the concepts by which we live and operate -terms are ever changing to fit our needs at the time
question
Dictionary Definitions
answer
-not supreme authority -you can disagree with them -have their own bias -can be a starting point
question
Formal Definitions
answer
Found in dictionaries Defines it in its "genus" then gives it the defining characteristics that put it in a specific species
question
Operational Definitions
answer
identifies an object or idea by what it does or by what conditions it creates. It's conditional (changes based off the situation) ?: Can someone who is paid for their community service still be considered a volunteer?
question
Definitions by Example
answer
Defines a class by listing its individual members. -focuses on who/what would be included in the defining list
question
Tentative Claim
answer
A declarative statement that represents your first response to a situation. -You cannot make an argument of definition if your tentative claim doesnt have a formal definition to weigh it against (you decide the formal?) -X can/cannot be considered a volunteer b/c volunteers are people who... (FORMAL DEF.)
question
Jargon
answer
A common and often highly technical vocabulary shared between people within an academic field. +Careful: Can alienate newcomers who don't recognize the words/acronyms
question
Be careful... (definition argument)
answer
-Use definitive terms instead of general ones with unintended connotations -Need to define/make comprehensible all pieces of your definition -Readers must accept -Need evidence for every part of the argument; visuals can be helpful -Conclusion should draw out the implications of the argument
question
Different styles of communication
answer
High - formal or ornate Middle - Understated and very clear Low - everyday or humorous
question
Vocabulary and style
answer
Word choice should match the subject, tone, and purpose
question
Slang
answer
Benefits: can enliven an argument Dangers: Can bewilder readers Jargon!
question
Technical Style Stuff
answer
*Need to vary sentence structure to keep readers' attention *Concrete style "moves readers along" *Parallel structure *Transitions help avoid boring, repetitive sentence structure *Benefits of a semicolon - stronger than comma less than period *Exclamation points, quesiton marks, colons, dashes. *punctuation is rhythm *Online lingo?
question
Figurative Language
answer
Language that calls up "figures", or "something else" *Aids understanding by drawing parallels between the known and the unknown *Makes arguments memorable *Trope v Scheme
question
Trope vs. Scheme
answer
TROPE: Involves a change in the ordinary meaning of a word or phrase SCHEME: involves a special arrangement of words. adds syntactic "zing"
question
TYPES of Tropes
answer
-Metaphor: -Simile: -Analogy: -Signifying: -Hyperbole: -Understatement -Rhetorical Questions -Antonomasia -Irony
question
Simile
answer
-Simile: A figure of speech using like or as to compare two things
question
Analogy
answer
-Analogy: compares two things, usually point by point, to show similarity or to argue that if two things are alike in one way then they are probably alike in other ways
question
Signifying
answer
-Signifying: when a speaker cleverly and humorously needles the listener. Popular among A-A culture. (Indirection, ironic humor, fluid rhythm, and surprising twist)
question
Hyperbole
answer
Overstatement for special effect. *audiences reaction should be predictable if you use this
question
Understatement
answer
A quiet, muted message to make an effective point.
question
Rhetorical Questions
answer
Don't really require answers. Help assert or deny something about an argument.
question
Antonomasia
answer
shorthand substitutions, often a descriptive word or phrase, for a proper name. Packs arguments into a nickname.
question
Irony
answer
The use of words to convey a meaning in tension with or opposite to their literal meaning
question
TYPES of Schemes
answer
-Parallelism -Antithesis -Inverted word order -Anaphora -Reversed structures
question
Parallelism
answer
the use of grammatically similar phrases or clauses for special effect.
question
Antithesis
answer
the use of parallel structure to mark contrast or opposition
question
Inverted word order
answer
when parts of a sentence or clause are not in the usual subject-verb-object order. yoda!
question
Anaphora
answer
-effective repetion -acts like drumbeat for rhythm of argument -brings the point home
question
Reversed structures
answer
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country" "Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original and the part that is original is not good"
question
Visual Argument
answer
-images as devices of authority (emperors faces on coins) -images to sway audiences -pathos makes stick in memory -reality shaped by the photographer's point of view -People see images differently -can do more than words -we respond to color. choose scheme that will forward the mood and message of argument -If presentation is off, you send the wrong signals. make messages deliberate -communicates preferences -font size can emphasize or deemphasize -put all related info in same font/font size *-What does the creator's attitude seem to be toward the image? -What does the visual text assume about its viewers?*
question
Logos/emblems
answer
-Convey a wealth of cultural and historical implications -Provides credibility
question
Graphs
answer
-conveys info effectively Pie chart: comparing parts to the whole Graph: comparing items over time or by other variables Diagrams or Drawings: drawing attention to details Maps: illustrates location and spatial relationships
question
Possible questions to ask yourself about print presentation
answer
Will font size draw attention to what is most important? What overall tone do you want to create?
question
Tips on Successful oral presentation
answer
-Be knowledgable on subject -Tone of voice, kind of evidence, length of speaking time -Appreciate that oral presentations are interactive -Argue to be HEARD, not READ -Key devices: parallelism, repetition, and climactic order
question
Tips on Discussion
answer
-Listen with purpose -Respond to questions or comments in specific terms -Learn the names of those in the discussion
question
Determine in Oral/Multimedia Presentation
answer
DETERMINE: Purpose of argument Type of Audience Structure of Presentation
question
Important Website Principles
answer
Contrast: Proximity: keeping together parts of the page that make for easy reading Repetition: consistent design of elements like headings/links that make for easy movement thru site Overall Impression: colors/visuals should reinforce
question
Blogs
answer
can be authors' pure opinion, or important sources of news, entertainment, politics important abilities: breaking news, building communities, argument, giving voice to the ordinary man
question
Firsthand evidence (DEFiNITION)
answer
comes from research you have conducted or been closely involved in. Requires collection and examination of data, often
question
Observation
answer
not that easy. Eyewitnesses often give different accounts of things. *Things to observe:* -a sequence of actions -repeated actions -interactions of a group -develop a system and be aware of how you record data
question
Interview
answer
How to interview: -determine purpose -prepare list of questions -record biographical information -use a dramatic quotation that represents the opinion of the interview
question
Surveys
answer
-Often require the use of questionnaire -think of the type and number of people you want to survey -free from bias -Test and revise -pay attention to structure
question
Experiments
answer
under rigorously controlled environments for science
question
Personal Experience
answer
should be used when it's appropriate to subject, purpose, and audience
question
First-Hand Experience TYPES
answer
-observations -interviews -surveys -experiments -personal experience
question
Second-hand evidence DEFINITION
answer
comes from sources beyond yourself. ie books, articles, photos
question
Library Sources
answer
Remember distinction between: Library databases Websites
question
Subject headings vs. Keywords
answer
Subject headings: standardized words and phrases used to classify the subject matter of books and articles Keywords: use computer's ability to look for any term in any field of the electronic record. less restrictive.
question
Researching
answer
Keep in mind: -What sources needed? -How current must sources be? -How many sources to consult? -Do you know way around lib.?
question
Two ways to search
answer
1. subject categories - keep clicking increasingly narrow links til reach list of articles 2. like a search engine
question
Don't rely on:
answer
extreme/outlier circumstances
question
Circumstantial evidence
answer
indirect evidence that suggests that something occurred but doesn't prove it directly
question
Critical Mass
answer
Enough evidence to support/prove a claim
question
Fallacies
answer
arguments flawed by their very nature or structure
question
Flashpoint or hotspot
answer
instantly raises questions about the ethics of argument - whether it is fair, honest, or principled
question
Ad hominem
answer
"to the man" a strategy of attacking the character of people you disagreed with rather than the actual substance of the argument
question
Danger of pathos
answer
pulling on heartstrings too often violates the good faith on which legitimate argument depends
question
Scare tactics
answer
work b/c it's easier to imagine something bad happening than to be realistic about its statistical rarity. cant be used to turn legitimate fears into panic or prejudice
question
Either-or
answer
simplify arguments and give them power by reducing the options for action to only 2 choices. often, 1 option drawn in warm light and other made to seem dangerous alternative. Become fallacious when they reduce complicated issues to excessively simple terms or when used to obscure alternatives
question
Slippery Slope
answer
an argument that portrays today's tiny misstep as tomorrow's slide into disaster. become fallacious when author exaggerates the consequences of an action and frightens readers
question
Sentimental appeals
answer
arguments that use tender emotion excessive to distract readers from facts (like danger of pathos)
question
Bandwagon appeals
answer
arguments that urge people to follow the same path that everyone else is taking. can easily seduce by frenzied obsession in mass media.
question
Emotional Fallacies TYPES
answer
scare tactics either or slippery slope sentimental appeals bandwagon
question
trust me
answer
scary warrant
question
Appeals to false authority
answer
when writers offer themselves or other authorities as sufficient warrant for believing a claim. All about warrants - a good source is not a good wrrant. CLAIM: X is true because Y says so WARRANT: What Y says must be true
question
Dogmatism
answer
asserting that only one position is conceivably acceptable within a community. Undermines credibility
question
Ethical Fallacies TYPES
answer
False authority Dogmatism Ad hominem
question
Logical Fallacies DEFINITION
answer
when the claims, warrants, or pieces of evidence are invalid, insufficient, or disconnected
question
Hasty Generalization
answer
an inference drawn from insufficient evidence -because a few people in a large group are observed to act in a certain way, all members of group are inferred to act similarly ->(basis for stereotypes) (qualifiers are always necessary to avoid these)
question
Faulty Causality
answer
"Post hoc, ergo propter hoc" "after this, therefore because of this" the fallacious assumption that b/c one event follows another, the first causes the second
question
Begging the Question
answer
assuming as true the very claim that is disputed. Circular argument divorced from reality. "the problem with the claim is that it's made on grounds that cannot be accepted as true because these grounds are in doubt" Bad warrant -> A student receiving a C
question
Equivocation
answer
an argument that gives a lie an honest appearance. A half-truth. -Language can be used equivocally by using a limited definition of a word
question
Non Sequiter
answer
an argument in which claims, reasons, or warrants fail to connect logically; one point doesn't follow from another. -occur when you omit a step in an otherwise logical chain of reasoning, assuming readers agree with some claim that may actually be high contestable
question
The Straw Man
answer
attacking an argument that isn't really there. Setting up the straw man: -create an argument that's easy to knock down -do so -claim victory over the opponent, whose real argument was actually different or didn't really exist
question
Faulty Analogy
answer
inaccurate or inconsequential comparisons b/w objects or concepts that occur when taken on their own and pushed too far or taken too seriously
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New